changeset 31:baa6194752f4

add some thoughts about the singularity.
author Robert McIntyre <rlm@mit.edu>
date Sun, 21 Apr 2013 03:05:51 +0000
parents 8d2aa8256786
children b93ea76ae7fc
files org/comprehend-singularity.org
diffstat 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
     1.1 --- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
     1.2 +++ b/org/comprehend-singularity.org	Sun Apr 21 03:05:51 2013 +0000
     1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
     1.4 +#+title: The Singularity might be Understandable after all.
     1.5 +#+author: Robert McIntyre
     1.6 +#+email: rlm@mit.edu
     1.7 +#+description: 
     1.8 +#+keywords: 
     1.9 +#+SETUPFILE: ../../aurellem/org/setup.org
    1.10 +#+INCLUDE: ../../aurellem/org/level-0.org
    1.11 +
    1.12 +
    1.13 +People like Ray Kurzeweil think that eventually, it will become
    1.14 +impossible to understand what the entities of the future will be
    1.15 +thinking, and their actions will be inscrutable, since their minds are
    1.16 +so much more complicated than ours. The idea is that the Minds of the
    1.17 +future will be to us as we are to ants.
    1.18 +
    1.19 +But if you search through the space of all possible programs with the
    1.20 +goal of coming up with one that describes something in the world, you
    1.21 +will find some common patterns no matter what type of mind you
    1.22 +have. Things like addition, concatentation, recursion, and induction
    1.23 +are all easy and immediate to find, and you will find them almost no
    1.24 +matter what way you search through program-space. In the world of
    1.25 +stories and language, these translate to simple patterns like revenge,
    1.26 +phyrric victory, success, failure, etc. The pricinple of simplicity
    1.27 +must be a driving, universal aesthetic force, since without it Minds
    1.28 +wouldn't be able to manange their own hardware and software, and would
    1.29 +not be able to grow.
    1.30 +
    1.31 +So, far in the future, when synthetic life rules the stars, it is
    1.32 +likely that their behavour will still be describable in the simplistic
    1.33 +terms of the human stories of old.
    1.34 \ No newline at end of file