Mercurial > thoughts
diff org/comprehend-singularity.org @ 31:baa6194752f4
add some thoughts about the singularity.
author | Robert McIntyre <rlm@mit.edu> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 21 Apr 2013 03:05:51 +0000 |
parents | |
children | eae81fa3a8e0 |
line wrap: on
line diff
1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 1.2 +++ b/org/comprehend-singularity.org Sun Apr 21 03:05:51 2013 +0000 1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ 1.4 +#+title: The Singularity might be Understandable after all. 1.5 +#+author: Robert McIntyre 1.6 +#+email: rlm@mit.edu 1.7 +#+description: 1.8 +#+keywords: 1.9 +#+SETUPFILE: ../../aurellem/org/setup.org 1.10 +#+INCLUDE: ../../aurellem/org/level-0.org 1.11 + 1.12 + 1.13 +People like Ray Kurzeweil think that eventually, it will become 1.14 +impossible to understand what the entities of the future will be 1.15 +thinking, and their actions will be inscrutable, since their minds are 1.16 +so much more complicated than ours. The idea is that the Minds of the 1.17 +future will be to us as we are to ants. 1.18 + 1.19 +But if you search through the space of all possible programs with the 1.20 +goal of coming up with one that describes something in the world, you 1.21 +will find some common patterns no matter what type of mind you 1.22 +have. Things like addition, concatentation, recursion, and induction 1.23 +are all easy and immediate to find, and you will find them almost no 1.24 +matter what way you search through program-space. In the world of 1.25 +stories and language, these translate to simple patterns like revenge, 1.26 +phyrric victory, success, failure, etc. The pricinple of simplicity 1.27 +must be a driving, universal aesthetic force, since without it Minds 1.28 +wouldn't be able to manange their own hardware and software, and would 1.29 +not be able to grow. 1.30 + 1.31 +So, far in the future, when synthetic life rules the stars, it is 1.32 +likely that their behavour will still be describable in the simplistic 1.33 +terms of the human stories of old. 1.34 \ No newline at end of file