Mercurial > thoughts
comparison org/comprehend-singularity.org @ 31:baa6194752f4
add some thoughts about the singularity.
author | Robert McIntyre <rlm@mit.edu> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 21 Apr 2013 03:05:51 +0000 |
parents | |
children | eae81fa3a8e0 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
30:8d2aa8256786 | 31:baa6194752f4 |
---|---|
1 #+title: The Singularity might be Understandable after all. | |
2 #+author: Robert McIntyre | |
3 #+email: rlm@mit.edu | |
4 #+description: | |
5 #+keywords: | |
6 #+SETUPFILE: ../../aurellem/org/setup.org | |
7 #+INCLUDE: ../../aurellem/org/level-0.org | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 People like Ray Kurzeweil think that eventually, it will become | |
11 impossible to understand what the entities of the future will be | |
12 thinking, and their actions will be inscrutable, since their minds are | |
13 so much more complicated than ours. The idea is that the Minds of the | |
14 future will be to us as we are to ants. | |
15 | |
16 But if you search through the space of all possible programs with the | |
17 goal of coming up with one that describes something in the world, you | |
18 will find some common patterns no matter what type of mind you | |
19 have. Things like addition, concatentation, recursion, and induction | |
20 are all easy and immediate to find, and you will find them almost no | |
21 matter what way you search through program-space. In the world of | |
22 stories and language, these translate to simple patterns like revenge, | |
23 phyrric victory, success, failure, etc. The pricinple of simplicity | |
24 must be a driving, universal aesthetic force, since without it Minds | |
25 wouldn't be able to manange their own hardware and software, and would | |
26 not be able to grow. | |
27 | |
28 So, far in the future, when synthetic life rules the stars, it is | |
29 likely that their behavour will still be describable in the simplistic | |
30 terms of the human stories of old. |