|
rlm@63
|
1 #+title: Ethics of Mind's Eye
|
|
rlm@63
|
2 #+author: Robert McIntyre
|
|
rlm@63
|
3 #+email: rlm@mit.edu
|
|
rlm@63
|
4 #+description:
|
|
rlm@63
|
5 #+keywords:
|
|
rlm@63
|
6 #+SETUPFILE: ../../aurellem/org/setup.org
|
|
rlm@63
|
7 #+INCLUDE: ../../aurellem/org/level-0.org
|
|
rlm@63
|
8 #+babel: :mkdirp yes :noweb yes :exports both
|
|
rlm@63
|
9
|
|
rlm@63
|
10 * COMMENT Ethical Considerations Regarding DARPA's Mind's Eye Program
|
|
rlm@63
|
11
|
|
rlm@63
|
12 As scientists and engineers, it is our sacred duty to explore the
|
|
rlm@63
|
13 boundaries of human knowledge in a responsible way. We are part of the
|
|
rlm@63
|
14 larger organism of humanity, and tasked with discovering new things
|
|
rlm@63
|
15 that help the race first, and all life second.
|
|
rlm@63
|
16
|
|
rlm@63
|
17 While knowledge and non-sentient technology is neither morally good or
|
|
rlm@63
|
18 evil, the things we discover are embedded in a wider cultural context,
|
|
rlm@63
|
19 and in many cases it is possible to foresee possible uses and abuses
|
|
rlm@63
|
20 our new technology will enable.
|
|
rlm@63
|
21
|
|
rlm@63
|
22 It is naive to think that the government or any group of humans is
|
|
rlm@63
|
23 either wholly good or evil, but by reasoning from the
|
|
rlm@63
|
24 motivations/power of such groups, we can try to infer whether a
|
|
rlm@63
|
25 technology will improve the lot of humanity or not.
|
|
rlm@63
|
26
|
|
rlm@63
|
27 It is possible to give and institution/culture a technology that they
|
|
rlm@63
|
28 will enthusiastically accept, but which will greatly diminish their
|
|
rlm@63
|
29 quality of life.
|
|
rlm@63
|
30
|
|
rlm@63
|
31 Some examples:
|
|
rlm@63
|
32
|
|
rlm@63
|
33 PGP -- an encryption suite that can help individuals to send messages
|
|
rlm@63
|
34
|
|
rlm@63
|
35
|
|
rlm@63
|
36
|
|
rlm@63
|
37 * Questions
|
|
rlm@63
|
38
|
|
rlm@63
|
39 - What should our ethical place be in deciding whether or not to
|
|
rlm@63
|
40 pursue research?
|
|
rlm@63
|
41
|
|
rlm@63
|
42 - Follow orders, assume our overall culture will use things
|
|
rlm@63
|
43 responsibly, and leave the ethical considerations to the
|
|
rlm@63
|
44 government/people.
|
|
rlm@63
|
45
|
|
rlm@63
|
46 - Many scientists who worked on the atomic bomb later questioned
|
|
rlm@63
|
47 their decisions.
|
|
rlm@63
|
48 - Yet, an advanced society /should/ have atomic weapons, if for
|
|
rlm@63
|
49 nothing else than to defend themselves from meteors, blow shit
|
|
rlm@63
|
50 up, etc.
|
|
rlm@63
|
51
|
|
rlm@63
|
52 - We are each morally responsible for the things we help create. We
|
|
rlm@63
|
53 are responsible for the misuses of technology we develop and the
|
|
rlm@63
|
54 pain and suffering it causes. Ultimately our contributions to
|
|
rlm@63
|
55 society will be judged by whether our technology did more good
|
|
rlm@63
|
56 than bad.
|
|
rlm@63
|
57
|
|
rlm@63
|
58 - If we decide that we *are* morally responsible for the technology we
|
|
rlm@63
|
59 develop, then is the Mind's Eye project in particular something we
|
|
rlm@63
|
60 should be doing?
|
|
rlm@63
|
61
|
|
rlm@63
|
62 - Here are some things you can build with Mind's Eye tech:
|
|
rlm@63
|
63
|
|
rlm@63
|
64 - System to monitor single humans living alone and call for help
|
|
rlm@63
|
65 in the case of emergencies (such as a fall)
|
|
rlm@63
|
66
|
|
rlm@63
|
67 - Same system for hospitals and nursing homes (of course, this
|
|
rlm@63
|
68 also makes them even more impersonal)
|
|
rlm@63
|
69
|
|
rlm@63
|
70 - The equivalent of a FBI special agent watching everything you do
|
|
rlm@63
|
71 from the moment you step out your door to the moment you go back
|
|
rlm@63
|
72 to your house to sleep, building a dossier of every move you
|
|
rlm@63
|
73 make, everyone you talk to, where you shop, etc.
|
|
rlm@63
|
74
|
|
rlm@63
|
75 - A concentration camp / prison that is ABSOLUTELY impossible to
|
|
rlm@63
|
76 escape from.
|
|
rlm@63
|
77
|
|
rlm@63
|
78 - Many other countries that don't care as much about human rights
|
|
rlm@63
|
79 as America will use this technology to monitor their citizens
|
|
rlm@63
|
80 24/7.
|
|
rlm@63
|
81
|
|
rlm@63
|
82 - Protection from surveillance in you own home does not apply
|
|
rlm@63
|
83 unless you *own* your house. Say goodbye to privacy in school
|
|
rlm@63
|
84 dorms, apartments, rented houses, etc.
|
|
rlm@63
|
85
|
|
rlm@63
|
86 - People are OK with current surveillance because it is
|
|
rlm@63
|
87 *dumb*. Mostly people only use security camera footage in the case
|
|
rlm@63
|
88 of crimes, and it is a painstaking process because it requires
|
|
rlm@63
|
89 manual human intervention. With AI, this will soon not be the
|
|
rlm@63
|
90 case.
|
|
rlm@63
|
91
|
|
rlm@64
|
92 |
