annotate clojure/com/aurellem/exp/struggle.txt @ 447:eea3b257ef59

removed some tracks.
author Robert McIntyre <rlm@mit.edu>
date Thu, 03 May 2012 06:22:34 -0500
parents d7f2e0384d24
children
rev   line source
rlm@214 1 ;; struggle works
rlm@214 2
rlm@214 3 [ccd5 (4 5 6 7 8)]
rlm@214 4 [cfe8 (5 4 3 2 1)]
rlm@214 5 [d02c (4 3 2 1 0)]
rlm@214 6 [d187 (4 3 2 1 0)]
rlm@214 7
rlm@214 8 ;; struggle doesn't work
rlm@214 9
rlm@214 10 [ccd5 (0 1 2 3 4)]
rlm@214 11 [cfe8 (0 4 3 2 1)]
rlm@214 12 [d02c (32 3 2 1 0)]
rlm@214 13 [d187 (4 3 2 1 0)]
rlm@214 14
rlm@214 15
rlm@214 16
rlm@214 17
rlm@214 18
rlm@214 19
rlm@214 20
rlm@214 21 ran:
rlm@214 22
rlm@214 23 (clojure.pprint/pprint (temporal-compare jiggly-4-pp jiggly-3-pp
rlm@214 24 jiggly-2-pp jiggly-1-pp jiggly-0-pp))
rlm@214 25
rlm@214 26 and:
rlm@214 27
rlm@214 28 (clojure.pprint/pprint (temporal-compare syn-jiggly-4-pp
rlm@214 29 syn-jiggly-3-pp syn-jiggly-2-pp syn-jiggly-1-pp syn-jiggly-0-pp))
rlm@214 30
rlm@214 31 to generate the above, then filtered manually
rlm@216 32
rlm@216 33
rlm@216 34
rlm@216 35
rlm@216 36 (def jiggly-lvl-3 (read-state "jiggly-lvl-3"))
rlm@216 37
rlm@216 38 (def jiggly-4-pp (read-state "jiggly-4-pp"))
rlm@216 39
rlm@216 40 (def jiggly-3-pp (read-state "jiggly-3-pp"))
rlm@216 41
rlm@216 42 (def jiggly-2-pp (read-state "jiggly-2-pp"))
rlm@216 43
rlm@216 44 (def jiggly-1-pp (read-state "jiggly-1-pp"))
rlm@216 45
rlm@216 46 (def jiggly-0-pp (read-state "jiggly-0-pp"))
rlm@216 47
rlm@216 48 (def jiggly-struggle-once (read-state "jiggly-struggle-once"))
rlm@216 49
rlm@216 50
rlm@216 51 (def syn-jiggly-4-pp (read-state "syn-jiggly-4-pp"))
rlm@216 52 (def syn-jiggly-3-pp (read-state "syn-jiggly-3-pp"))
rlm@216 53 (def syn-jiggly-2-pp (read-state "syn-jiggly-2-pp"))
rlm@216 54 (def syn-jiggly-1-pp (read-state "syn-jiggly-1-pp"))
rlm@216 55 (def syn-jiggly-0-pp (read-state "syn-jiggly-0-pp"))
rlm@216 56
rlm@216 57 Turns out that the pp for the non-existent moves
rlm@216 58 for the synthetic jigglypuff were not zeroed, causing
rlm@216 59 struggle to fail. Not really an exciting conclusion, but
rlm@216 60 there it is.