Mercurial > thoughts
changeset 74:ca1cd5bab77d
thesis bibliography.
author | Robert McIntyre <rlm@mit.edu> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:48:39 -0500 |
parents | 135fabc13f8a |
children | 18cec87dbd9c 8714919e1e52 |
files | org/ideas.org |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
1.1 --- a/org/ideas.org Sat Nov 16 15:16:04 2013 -0500 1.2 +++ b/org/ideas.org Sat Nov 16 17:48:39 2013 -0500 1.3 @@ -31,6 +31,18 @@ 1.4 getting credit. 1.5 #+end_quote 1.6 1.7 +- better bibliography :: when writing a thesis or paper, have the 1.8 + biblography not just be an opaque list of resources, but have it 1.9 + be a list of /summaries/ and /qualities/ that each paper has in 1.10 + the context of the paper being written. When examaning a 1.11 + biblography, I want to know if reading the papers in the 1.12 + bibliography are worth my time, and I also am probably also 1.13 + interested in exactly the things that are being discussed in the 1.14 + paper I'm reading. The bibliography is the perfect place to 1.15 + provide information about the referenced papers from the 1.16 + author's perspective. I will use this biblographic form in my own 1.17 + thesis. 1.18 + 1.19 - digital inter-library loan :: libraries at universities already do 1.20 interlibrary loans for books, so why not do the same for access 1.21 to stupid paywalled digital papers? All the universities could