Mercurial > thoughts
comparison org/patents.org @ 15:bffd7519431c
description of patents.
author | Robert McIntyre <rlm@mit.edu> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:47:39 +0000 |
parents | e4ee3818a033 |
children | d5b95ca78266 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
14:e4ee3818a033 | 15:bffd7519431c |
---|---|
15 you create a work in some permanent form; you don't have to request | 15 you create a work in some permanent form; you don't have to request |
16 it or anything. It lets you prevent other people from copying your | 16 it or anything. It lets you prevent other people from copying your |
17 work, reading your work, or creating derivitave works based on your | 17 work, reading your work, or creating derivitave works based on your |
18 work. | 18 work. |
19 | 19 |
20 | 20 Thus, copyright is what I call a "negative force". It is something |
21 that you use to prevent the flow of information; it lets you remove | |
22 the abilities of other people to use "your" information. | |
23 | |
21 * GPL uses copyright as a positive force | 24 * GPL uses copyright as a positive force |
22 | 25 |
23 * Patents generally an inhibitive force. | 26 The genius of the GPL license is that it takes the negative force of |
27 copyright and turns it on its head. With the GPL, copyright can be | |
28 used to enable freedom, and ensure peoples' rights to freely use | |
29 your information. The GPL essentially reads: | |
24 | 30 |
31 #+begin_quote | |
32 This work is copyrighted, but by recieving this work you gain the | |
33 rights to distribute, copy, and make derivitave works based on this | |
34 work, but only if you also license such work under this license. | |
35 #+end_quote | |
36 | |
37 The requirement for using the GPL in derivative works makes the GPL | |
38 "infectious", which means the GPL will "contaminate" all derivative | |
39 works with itself. This ensures that even after many many | |
40 alterations, the modified work will still respect its users' | |
41 freedoms the same as the original work. | |
42 | |
43 * Patents, like copyright, are normally a negative force | |
44 | |
45 Patents, unlike copyright, are something you must request from the | |
46 government. You are only supposed to be able to get a patent for a | |
47 "novel" idea, which is an idea that wouldn't be obvious to someone | |
48 working in the relevant field. A patent can be for the plans to a | |
49 physical object ("regular" patents), an algorithm (software patent), | |
50 of a way of doing something (process patent). Once you have a | |
51 patent, it gives you the ability to stop anyone else from using your | |
52 idea in any other invention. This is supposed to give you a | |
53 temporary monopoly to help you make money off your invention before | |
54 anyone else would be legally allowed to do so. In practce, many | |
55 patents are given for ideas that are quite obvious to pretty much | |
56 everyone. For example, Amazon has a patent (#[[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5715399][5,715,399]]) on the idea | |
57 of presenting a coustomer with the last four digits of a credit card | |
58 instead of displaying the entire numbner. Amazon can sue any other | |
59 company that displays only the last four digits of a credit card | |
60 number and prevent them from using that method unless they pay | |
61 Amazon a lot of money. Needless to say, there are many patents that | |
62 are very silly. | |
63 | |
64 Now, I choose a particurally silly patent, but the point is that | |
65 patents can be a great force for the retardation of progress. Many | |
66 silly patents have been issued, and a patent lasts for 17 years. For | |
67 almost any idea, there will be some patent that will cover your | |
68 idea, and then the entity that owns that patent can prevent you from | |
69 selling products based on that idea /or even giving products based | |
70 on that idea away for free/. | |
71 | |
72 ** Patents are treated as physical objects | |
73 They can be sold, seized, etc. This is because the government wants | |
74 new inventions to actually be made available to the public. The idea | |
75 here is that if you are an inventor and you obtain a patent on a | |
76 cool invention, but are unable/unwilling to develop an commercial | |
77 product, you can sell that patent to some company and give them the | |
78 exclusive rights to make that invention. | |
79 | |
80 ** Patents are arranged in a dependency network | |
81 | |
25 Patents are usually a negative force, one that allows you to stop | 82 Patents are usually a negative force, one that allows you to stop |
26 other entities from using knowledge to their own advantage. | 83 other entities from using knowledge to their own advantage. |
27 | 84 |
28 * Google has created "neutral" patents via a pledge which attaches conditions to its patents. | 85 * Google has created "neutral" patents via a pledge which attaches conditions to its patents. |
29 Google has a pledge at | 86 Google has a pledge at |