Mercurial > thoughts
comparison org/good-ideas.org @ 162:bdeaad2b1507
cryonics links.
author | Robert McIntyre <rlm@mit.edu> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:01:05 -0700 |
parents | ba80a6a67b55 |
children | 7a6b855cfb99 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
161:8f44e4061701 | 162:bdeaad2b1507 |
---|---|
37 | 37 |
38 | 38 |
39 #+BEGIN_HTML | 39 #+BEGIN_HTML |
40 <hr/> | 40 <hr/> |
41 #+END_HTML | 41 #+END_HTML |
42 | |
43 | |
44 | |
45 ** A simple merge procedure for uploads | |
46 Putting aside the philosophical problems around mind-uploading for | |
47 a moment, imagine that you were /already/ a computer program | |
48 running on a suitable robotic body. Let's say that the program is | |
49 based off a detailed emulation of your brain -- no one really | |
50 understands exactly /how/ the program is doing its computations, | |
51 only that it faithfully recreates the original biological | |
52 computations. At this point, you might want to be able to exist in | |
53 multiple places at once while still maintining a coherent unity of | |
54 identity, but how do you do it? You /can't/ modifiy your mind to | |
55 handle multiple bodies at once, because this would require | |
56 extensive understanding of exactly how your program is doing its | |
57 computations in order to scale it to multiple bodies. But you can't | |
58 just copy yourself either, because the copies will eventually | |
59 diverge leading to a loss of unity of identity. You can't easily | |
60 merge copies together after they've "diverged" because again, you'd | |
61 have to come up with a coherent theory of mind to merge the | |
62 datastructures. One simple way to do merges is this: First, you | |
63 need to acchitect the robot bodies to record every single bit | |
64 that's passing through all sensory nerves throughout a small time | |
65 interval that's insufficient to create significant divergence. For | |
66 sake of argument I'll assume that you do this each day. This stream | |
67 of data represents the ultimate "life recording" and can be easily | |
68 accomplished either in simulation of physical reality by using | |
69 custom sensory organs, like in [[http://aurellem.org/#CORTEX][=CORTEX=]]. This set of information, | |
70 if played back to a copy of you in the exact mental state right | |
71 before the start of recording, would perfectaly match with the | |
72 choices of the individual and serve as an adequate replacement for | |
73 the world, even though it contains almost no information compared | |
74 to the world! Once you can do the "full life records," then the | |
75 procedure works like this: At the morning of Day 1 you "checkout" | |
76 the one copy of you from yesterday and make around 10 copies which | |
77 each live out their day. Each copy records a full "life recording" | |
78 for the day. Then one copy is chosen as the "trunk" and the rest as | |
79 branches. The trunk replays the life-recordings of the branches in | |
80 accelerated time over the night, and the branches are then deleted | |
81 leaving only one individual that remembers 10 consecutive days | |
82 spent in different contexts. Then you repeat the process for Day 2 | |
83 and so on. I'll call this the "small delta-T approximation" method | |
84 for mind-merging. It works as long as the timeframe is not too long | |
85 an is limited by how fast you can faithfully replay life | |
86 recordings. You don't have to be "offline" for any amount of time | |
87 while doing this: You can also alternate two sets of 10, one for | |
88 the day and one for the night, and have the night and day trunks be | |
89 generated from the last day / night group's trunk, | |
90 respectively. This trades having to "sleep" for the day/night crews | |
91 not being able to remember what happened last night/day | |
92 respectively. The more you know about how brains work, the faster | |
93 you can integrate previous experience and the more copies you can | |
94 sustain. This methods means that you never lose any experience, but | |
95 if you're willing to lose some nonessential experiences, a more | |
96 extreme version of this might be to make a copy of yourself that | |
97 accomplishes a task and then reports anything of note in a written | |
98 report. | |
42 | 99 |
43 ** Earth, Air, Water | 100 ** Earth, Air, Water |
44 | 101 |
45 Probably all intelligent species name their planet "dirt" in their | 102 Probably all intelligent species name their planet "dirt" in their |
46 language, unless the're aquatic or flying, then they'd name it | 103 language, unless the're aquatic or flying, then they'd name it |
333 ** Microwave-Time | 390 ** Microwave-Time |
334 The cooking time you enter on most microwaves is insane. It's | 391 The cooking time you enter on most microwaves is insane. It's |
335 expressed in what I call a "hybrid base", a combination of base 10 | 392 expressed in what I call a "hybrid base", a combination of base 10 |
336 and base 60. You can get absurd things like 100 < 61, and 120 == | 393 and base 60. You can get absurd things like 100 < 61, and 120 == |
337 80! I wonder if these hybrid base systems could be very useful for | 394 80! I wonder if these hybrid base systems could be very useful for |
338 some purposes! | 395 some purposes! Dylan [[http://logical.ai/microwave/org/sawtooth.html][wrote a blog post on this subject!]] |
339 | 396 |
340 ** Three Eyes | 397 ** Three Eyes |
341 If you had three eyes, would you still draw cubes like we currently | 398 If you had three eyes, would you still draw cubes like we currently |
342 draw them? Or would all 2D-representations of 3D space always look | 399 draw them? Or would all 2D-representations of 3D space always look |
343 hopelessly fake? | 400 hopelessly fake? |