Mercurial > cortex
diff thesis/cortex.org @ 554:663e3d4f98c1
more winston changes.
author | Robert McIntyre <rlm@mit.edu> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 02 May 2014 14:16:35 -0400 |
parents | 20f64a70f8c5 |
children | c8f7d10b1a2a |
line wrap: on
line diff
1.1 --- a/thesis/cortex.org Fri May 02 14:08:09 2014 -0400 1.2 +++ b/thesis/cortex.org Fri May 02 14:16:35 2014 -0400 1.3 @@ -2565,11 +2565,11 @@ 1.4 1.5 ** Action recognition is easy with a full gamut of senses 1.6 1.7 - Embodied representations using multiple senses such as touch, 1.8 + Embodied representation using multiple senses such as touch, 1.9 proprioception, and muscle tension turns out be exceedingly 1.10 efficient at describing body-centered actions. It is the right 1.11 language for the job. For example, it takes only around 5 lines of 1.12 - LISP code to describe the action of curling using embodied 1.13 + clojure code to describe the action of curling using embodied 1.14 primitives. It takes about 10 lines to describe the seemingly 1.15 complicated action of wiggling. 1.16 1.17 @@ -2770,8 +2770,7 @@ 1.18 require! 1.19 1.20 The trick now is to make the action predicates work even when the 1.21 - sensory data on which they depend is absent. If I can do that, then 1.22 - I will have gained much. 1.23 + sensory data on which they depend is absent! 1.24 1.25 ** \Phi-space describes the worm's experiences 1.26 1.27 @@ -2871,6 +2870,7 @@ 1.28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1.29 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.30 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1.31 + 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 1.32 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1.33 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 1.34 9 9 9 9 9 9 9