1.1 --- a/thesis/cortex.bib	Sat Mar 29 22:03:51 2014 -0400
     1.2 +++ b/thesis/cortex.bib	Sat Mar 29 22:46:05 2014 -0400
     1.3 @@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
     1.4   note = {Available as :
     1.5            \url{http://groups.csail.mit.edu/genesis/papers/2012bica-phw}}, 
     1.6   addendum = {\why{Great summary of historical attempts at AI, and more
     1.7 -                  thoughts on how directed perception and mimicry
     1.8 -                  as in {\tt EMPATH} might play an important role in
     1.9 +                  thoughts on how directed perception and mimicry as
    1.10 +                  in {\tt EMPATH} might play an important role in
    1.11                    intelligence.}}
    1.12  } 
    1.13  
    1.14 @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
    1.15    title  = "Evolving Virtual Creatures",
    1.16    journal = "Computer Graphics (Siggraph '94 Proceedings)",
    1.17    year = "1994",
    1.18 -  month = "July",
    1.19 +  month = "7",
    1.20    pages = "15--22",
    1.21    note = "Available as: \url{http://www.karlsims.com/papers/siggraph94.pdf}",
    1.22    addendum = {\why{Karl Sims uses a simulated virtual environment
    1.23 @@ -66,6 +66,22 @@
    1.24                    research.}},
    1.25  }
    1.26  
    1.27 +@INPROCEEDINGS{volume-action-recognition,
    1.28 +  author={Yan Ke and Sukthankar, R. and Hebert, M.},
    1.29 +  title={Efficient visual event detection using volumetric features},
    1.30 +  year={2005},
    1.31 +  month={10},
    1.32 +  volume={1},
    1.33 +  pages={166-173 Vol. 1},
    1.34 +  note = {\url{http://www.intel-research.net/Publications/Pittsburgh/092620050705_320.pdf}},
    1.35 +  booktitle={Computer Vision, 2005. ICCV 2005. Tenth IEEE International Conference},
    1.36 +  addendum = {\why{This is an example of using frame-dependent methods
    1.37 +                  to detect actions in video. I consider this to be
    1.38 +                  the wrong language for describing actions, because
    1.39 +                  it has no way to completely describe even a simple
    1.40 +                  action like ``curling'' form all points of view.}}
    1.41 +}
    1.42 +
    1.43  
    1.44  @Comment SOM larson paper
    1.45  
    1.46 @@ -73,9 +89,8 @@
    1.47  
    1.48  @COMMENT sussman's HACKER
    1.49  
    1.50 -@comment motion as a 4D manifold
    1.51 -
    1.52 -@comment brooks intelligence without representation 
    1.53 +@comment brooks intelligence without representation
    1.54  
    1.55  @comment turing turing test paper
    1.56  
    1.57 +                   
    1.58 \ No newline at end of file