rlm@425
|
1 #+title: =CORTEX=
|
rlm@425
|
2 #+author: Robert McIntyre
|
rlm@425
|
3 #+email: rlm@mit.edu
|
rlm@425
|
4 #+description: Using embodied AI to facilitate Artificial Imagination.
|
rlm@425
|
5 #+keywords: AI, clojure, embodiment
|
rlm@451
|
6 #+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [nofloat]
|
rlm@422
|
7
|
rlm@465
|
8 * COMMENT templates
|
rlm@470
|
9 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
10 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
11 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
12 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
13 #+name: name
|
rlm@470
|
14 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@479
|
15 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@479
|
16 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@470
|
17 #+end_listing
|
rlm@465
|
18
|
rlm@470
|
19 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
20 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
21 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
22 #+name: name
|
rlm@470
|
23 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@470
|
24 [[./images/aurellem-gray.png]]
|
rlm@470
|
25
|
rlm@470
|
26 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
27 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
28 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
29 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
30 #+name: name
|
rlm@470
|
31 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@475
|
32 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@475
|
33 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@470
|
34 #+end_listing
|
rlm@470
|
35
|
rlm@470
|
36 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
37 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
38 #+caption:
|
rlm@470
|
39 #+name: name
|
rlm@470
|
40 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@470
|
41 [[./images/aurellem-gray.png]]
|
rlm@470
|
42
|
rlm@465
|
43
|
rlm@541
|
44 * Empathy \& Embodiment: problem solving strategies
|
rlm@516
|
45
|
rlm@551
|
46 By the time you have read this thesis, you will understand a novel
|
rlm@551
|
47 approach to representing and recognizing physical actions using
|
rlm@551
|
48 embodiment and empathy. You will also see one way to efficiently
|
rlm@551
|
49 implement physical empathy for embodied creatures. Finally, you will
|
rlm@551
|
50 become familiar with =CORTEX=, a system for designing and simulating
|
rlm@551
|
51 creatures with rich senses, which I have designed as a library that
|
rlm@551
|
52 you can use in your own research. Note that I /do not/ process video
|
rlm@551
|
53 directly --- I start with knowledge of the positions of a creature's
|
rlm@551
|
54 body parts and work from there.
|
rlm@437
|
55
|
rlm@516
|
56 This is the core vision of my thesis: That one of the important ways
|
rlm@516
|
57 in which we understand others is by imagining ourselves in their
|
rlm@516
|
58 position and emphatically feeling experiences relative to our own
|
rlm@516
|
59 bodies. By understanding events in terms of our own previous
|
rlm@516
|
60 corporeal experience, we greatly constrain the possibilities of what
|
rlm@516
|
61 would otherwise be an unwieldy exponential search. This extra
|
rlm@516
|
62 constraint can be the difference between easily understanding what
|
rlm@516
|
63 is happening in a video and being completely lost in a sea of
|
rlm@516
|
64 incomprehensible color and movement.
|
rlm@516
|
65
|
rlm@525
|
66 ** The problem: recognizing actions is hard!
|
rlm@511
|
67
|
rlm@551
|
68 Examine figure \ref{cat-drink}. What is happening? As you, and
|
rlm@551
|
69 indeed very young children, can easily determine, this is an image
|
rlm@551
|
70 of drinking.
|
rlm@516
|
71
|
rlm@441
|
72 #+caption: A cat drinking some water. Identifying this action is
|
rlm@511
|
73 #+caption: beyond the capabilities of existing computer vision systems.
|
rlm@551
|
74 #+name: cat-drink
|
rlm@441
|
75 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 7cm
|
rlm@441
|
76 [[./images/cat-drinking.jpg]]
|
rlm@511
|
77
|
rlm@511
|
78 Nevertheless, it is beyond the state of the art for a computer
|
rlm@516
|
79 vision program to describe what's happening in this image. Part of
|
rlm@516
|
80 the problem is that many computer vision systems focus on
|
rlm@516
|
81 pixel-level details or comparisons to example images (such as
|
rlm@516
|
82 \cite{volume-action-recognition}), but the 3D world is so variable
|
rlm@517
|
83 that it is hard to describe the world in terms of possible images.
|
rlm@511
|
84
|
rlm@547
|
85 In fact, the contents of a scene may have much less to do with
|
rlm@547
|
86 pixel probabilities than with recognizing various affordances:
|
rlm@547
|
87 things you can move, objects you can grasp, spaces that can be
|
rlm@547
|
88 filled . For example, what processes might enable you to see the
|
rlm@547
|
89 chair in figure \ref{hidden-chair}?
|
rlm@516
|
90
|
rlm@525
|
91 #+caption: The chair in this image is quite obvious to humans, but
|
rlm@525
|
92 #+caption: it can't be found by any modern computer vision program.
|
rlm@441
|
93 #+name: hidden-chair
|
rlm@441
|
94 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@441
|
95 [[./images/fat-person-sitting-at-desk.jpg]]
|
rlm@511
|
96
|
rlm@441
|
97 Finally, how is it that you can easily tell the difference between
|
rlm@551
|
98 how the girl's /muscles/ are working in figure \ref{girl}?
|
rlm@441
|
99
|
rlm@441
|
100 #+caption: The mysterious ``common sense'' appears here as you are able
|
rlm@441
|
101 #+caption: to discern the difference in how the girl's arm muscles
|
rlm@551
|
102 #+caption: are activated between the two images. When you compare
|
rlm@551
|
103 #+caption: these two images, do you feel something in your own arm
|
rlm@551
|
104 #+caption: muscles?
|
rlm@441
|
105 #+name: girl
|
rlm@448
|
106 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 7cm
|
rlm@441
|
107 [[./images/wall-push.png]]
|
rlm@437
|
108
|
rlm@441
|
109 Each of these examples tells us something about what might be going
|
rlm@517
|
110 on in our minds as we easily solve these recognition problems:
|
rlm@441
|
111
|
rlm@547
|
112 - The hidden chair shows us that we are strongly triggered by cues
|
rlm@547
|
113 relating to the position of human bodies, and that we can
|
rlm@547
|
114 determine the overall physical configuration of a human body even
|
rlm@547
|
115 if much of that body is occluded.
|
rlm@547
|
116
|
rlm@547
|
117 - The picture of the girl pushing against the wall tells us that we
|
rlm@547
|
118 have common sense knowledge about the kinetics of our own bodies.
|
rlm@547
|
119 We know well how our muscles would have to work to maintain us in
|
rlm@547
|
120 most positions, and we can easily project this self-knowledge to
|
rlm@547
|
121 imagined positions triggered by images of the human body.
|
rlm@547
|
122
|
rlm@547
|
123 - The cat tells us that imagination of some kind plays an important
|
rlm@547
|
124 role in understanding actions. The question is: Can we be more
|
rlm@547
|
125 precise about what sort of imagination is required to understand
|
rlm@547
|
126 these actions?
|
rlm@517
|
127
|
rlm@511
|
128 ** A step forward: the sensorimotor-centered approach
|
rlm@516
|
129
|
rlm@511
|
130 In this thesis, I explore the idea that our knowledge of our own
|
rlm@516
|
131 bodies, combined with our own rich senses, enables us to recognize
|
rlm@516
|
132 the actions of others.
|
rlm@516
|
133
|
rlm@516
|
134 For example, I think humans are able to label the cat video as
|
rlm@516
|
135 ``drinking'' because they imagine /themselves/ as the cat, and
|
rlm@516
|
136 imagine putting their face up against a stream of water and
|
rlm@516
|
137 sticking out their tongue. In that imagined world, they can feel
|
rlm@516
|
138 the cool water hitting their tongue, and feel the water entering
|
rlm@516
|
139 their body, and are able to recognize that /feeling/ as drinking.
|
rlm@516
|
140 So, the label of the action is not really in the pixels of the
|
rlm@547
|
141 image, but is found clearly in a simulation / recollection inspired
|
rlm@547
|
142 by those pixels. An imaginative system, having been trained on
|
rlm@547
|
143 drinking and non-drinking examples and learning that the most
|
rlm@551
|
144 important component of drinking is the feeling of water flowing
|
rlm@547
|
145 down one's throat, would analyze a video of a cat drinking in the
|
rlm@547
|
146 following manner:
|
rlm@516
|
147
|
rlm@516
|
148 1. Create a physical model of the video by putting a ``fuzzy''
|
rlm@516
|
149 model of its own body in place of the cat. Possibly also create
|
rlm@516
|
150 a simulation of the stream of water.
|
rlm@516
|
151
|
rlm@551
|
152 2. Play out this simulated scene and generate imagined sensory
|
rlm@516
|
153 experience. This will include relevant muscle contractions, a
|
rlm@516
|
154 close up view of the stream from the cat's perspective, and most
|
rlm@517
|
155 importantly, the imagined feeling of water entering the mouth.
|
rlm@517
|
156 The imagined sensory experience can come from a simulation of
|
rlm@517
|
157 the event, but can also be pattern-matched from previous,
|
rlm@517
|
158 similar embodied experience.
|
rlm@516
|
159
|
rlm@516
|
160 3. The action is now easily identified as drinking by the sense of
|
rlm@516
|
161 taste alone. The other senses (such as the tongue moving in and
|
rlm@516
|
162 out) help to give plausibility to the simulated action. Note that
|
rlm@516
|
163 the sense of vision, while critical in creating the simulation,
|
rlm@516
|
164 is not critical for identifying the action from the simulation.
|
rlm@516
|
165
|
rlm@516
|
166 For the chair examples, the process is even easier:
|
rlm@516
|
167
|
rlm@516
|
168 1. Align a model of your body to the person in the image.
|
rlm@516
|
169
|
rlm@516
|
170 2. Generate proprioceptive sensory data from this alignment.
|
rlm@516
|
171
|
rlm@516
|
172 3. Use the imagined proprioceptive data as a key to lookup related
|
rlm@517
|
173 sensory experience associated with that particular proprioceptive
|
rlm@516
|
174 feeling.
|
rlm@516
|
175
|
rlm@516
|
176 4. Retrieve the feeling of your bottom resting on a surface, your
|
rlm@516
|
177 knees bent, and your leg muscles relaxed.
|
rlm@516
|
178
|
rlm@516
|
179 5. This sensory information is consistent with your =sitting?=
|
rlm@516
|
180 sensory predicate, so you (and the entity in the image) must be
|
rlm@516
|
181 sitting.
|
rlm@516
|
182
|
rlm@516
|
183 6. There must be a chair-like object since you are sitting.
|
rlm@516
|
184
|
rlm@516
|
185 Empathy offers yet another alternative to the age-old AI
|
rlm@516
|
186 representation question: ``What is a chair?'' --- A chair is the
|
rlm@516
|
187 feeling of sitting!
|
rlm@516
|
188
|
rlm@516
|
189 One powerful advantage of empathic problem solving is that it
|
rlm@516
|
190 factors the action recognition problem into two easier problems. To
|
rlm@516
|
191 use empathy, you need an /aligner/, which takes the video and a
|
rlm@516
|
192 model of your body, and aligns the model with the video. Then, you
|
rlm@516
|
193 need a /recognizer/, which uses the aligned model to interpret the
|
rlm@516
|
194 action. The power in this method lies in the fact that you describe
|
rlm@521
|
195 all actions from a body-centered viewpoint. You are less tied to
|
rlm@516
|
196 the particulars of any visual representation of the actions. If you
|
rlm@516
|
197 teach the system what ``running'' is, and you have a good enough
|
rlm@516
|
198 aligner, the system will from then on be able to recognize running
|
rlm@547
|
199 from any point of view -- even strange points of view like above or
|
rlm@516
|
200 underneath the runner. This is in contrast to action recognition
|
rlm@516
|
201 schemes that try to identify actions using a non-embodied approach.
|
rlm@516
|
202 If these systems learn about running as viewed from the side, they
|
rlm@516
|
203 will not automatically be able to recognize running from any other
|
rlm@516
|
204 viewpoint.
|
rlm@516
|
205
|
rlm@516
|
206 Another powerful advantage is that using the language of multiple
|
rlm@547
|
207 body-centered rich senses to describe body-centered actions offers
|
rlm@547
|
208 a massive boost in descriptive capability. Consider how difficult
|
rlm@547
|
209 it would be to compose a set of HOG (Histogram of Oriented
|
rlm@547
|
210 Gradients) filters to describe the action of a simple worm-creature
|
rlm@547
|
211 ``curling'' so that its head touches its tail, and then behold the
|
rlm@547
|
212 simplicity of describing thus action in a language designed for the
|
rlm@547
|
213 task (listing \ref{grand-circle-intro}):
|
rlm@516
|
214
|
rlm@517
|
215 #+caption: Body-centered actions are best expressed in a body-centered
|
rlm@516
|
216 #+caption: language. This code detects when the worm has curled into a
|
rlm@516
|
217 #+caption: full circle. Imagine how you would replicate this functionality
|
rlm@516
|
218 #+caption: using low-level pixel features such as HOG filters!
|
rlm@516
|
219 #+name: grand-circle-intro
|
rlm@516
|
220 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@516
|
221 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@516
|
222 (defn grand-circle?
|
rlm@516
|
223 "Does the worm form a majestic circle (one end touching the other)?"
|
rlm@516
|
224 [experiences]
|
rlm@516
|
225 (and (curled? experiences)
|
rlm@516
|
226 (let [worm-touch (:touch (peek experiences))
|
rlm@516
|
227 tail-touch (worm-touch 0)
|
rlm@516
|
228 head-touch (worm-touch 4)]
|
rlm@516
|
229 (and (< 0.2 (contact worm-segment-bottom-tip tail-touch))
|
rlm@516
|
230 (< 0.2 (contact worm-segment-top-tip head-touch))))))
|
rlm@516
|
231 #+end_src
|
rlm@516
|
232 #+end_listing
|
rlm@516
|
233
|
rlm@517
|
234 ** =EMPATH= recognizes actions using empathy
|
rlm@517
|
235
|
rlm@517
|
236 Exploring these ideas further demands a concrete implementation, so
|
rlm@517
|
237 first, I built a system for constructing virtual creatures with
|
rlm@511
|
238 physiologically plausible sensorimotor systems and detailed
|
rlm@551
|
239 environments. The result is =CORTEX=, which I describe in chapter
|
rlm@517
|
240 \ref{sec-2}.
|
rlm@511
|
241
|
rlm@511
|
242 Next, I wrote routines which enabled a simple worm-like creature to
|
rlm@511
|
243 infer the actions of a second worm-like creature, using only its
|
rlm@511
|
244 own prior sensorimotor experiences and knowledge of the second
|
rlm@511
|
245 worm's joint positions. This program, =EMPATH=, is described in
|
rlm@551
|
246 chapter \ref{sec-3}. It's main components are:
|
rlm@517
|
247
|
rlm@517
|
248 - Embodied Action Definitions :: Many otherwise complicated actions
|
rlm@517
|
249 are easily described in the language of a full suite of
|
rlm@517
|
250 body-centered, rich senses and experiences. For example,
|
rlm@551
|
251 drinking is the feeling of water flowing down your throat, and
|
rlm@448
|
252 cooling your insides. It's often accompanied by bringing your
|
rlm@448
|
253 hand close to your face, or bringing your face close to water.
|
rlm@448
|
254 Sitting down is the feeling of bending your knees, activating
|
rlm@448
|
255 your quadriceps, then feeling a surface with your bottom and
|
rlm@448
|
256 relaxing your legs. These body-centered action descriptions
|
rlm@448
|
257 can be either learned or hard coded.
|
rlm@517
|
258
|
rlm@517
|
259 - Guided Play :: The creature moves around and experiences the
|
rlm@517
|
260 world through its unique perspective. As the creature moves,
|
rlm@517
|
261 it gathers experiences that satisfy the embodied action
|
rlm@517
|
262 definitions.
|
rlm@517
|
263
|
rlm@517
|
264 - Posture imitation :: When trying to interpret a video or image,
|
rlm@448
|
265 the creature takes a model of itself and aligns it with
|
rlm@517
|
266 whatever it sees. This alignment might even cross species, as
|
rlm@448
|
267 when humans try to align themselves with things like ponies,
|
rlm@448
|
268 dogs, or other humans with a different body type.
|
rlm@517
|
269
|
rlm@517
|
270 - Empathy :: The alignment triggers associations with
|
rlm@448
|
271 sensory data from prior experiences. For example, the
|
rlm@448
|
272 alignment itself easily maps to proprioceptive data. Any
|
rlm@448
|
273 sounds or obvious skin contact in the video can to a lesser
|
rlm@517
|
274 extent trigger previous experience keyed to hearing or touch.
|
rlm@517
|
275 Segments of previous experiences gained from play are stitched
|
rlm@517
|
276 together to form a coherent and complete sensory portrait of
|
rlm@517
|
277 the scene.
|
rlm@517
|
278
|
rlm@547
|
279 - Recognition :: With the scene described in terms of remembered
|
rlm@547
|
280 first person sensory events, the creature can now run its
|
rlm@547
|
281 action-definition programs (such as the one in listing
|
rlm@547
|
282 \ref{grand-circle-intro}) on this synthesized sensory data,
|
rlm@517
|
283 just as it would if it were actually experiencing the scene
|
rlm@517
|
284 first-hand. If previous experience has been accurately
|
rlm@447
|
285 retrieved, and if it is analogous enough to the scene, then
|
rlm@447
|
286 the creature will correctly identify the action in the scene.
|
rlm@441
|
287
|
rlm@441
|
288 My program, =EMPATH= uses this empathic problem solving technique
|
rlm@441
|
289 to interpret the actions of a simple, worm-like creature.
|
rlm@437
|
290
|
rlm@441
|
291 #+caption: The worm performs many actions during free play such as
|
rlm@441
|
292 #+caption: curling, wiggling, and resting.
|
rlm@441
|
293 #+name: worm-intro
|
rlm@446
|
294 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 15cm
|
rlm@445
|
295 [[./images/worm-intro-white.png]]
|
rlm@437
|
296
|
rlm@462
|
297 #+caption: =EMPATH= recognized and classified each of these
|
rlm@462
|
298 #+caption: poses by inferring the complete sensory experience
|
rlm@462
|
299 #+caption: from proprioceptive data.
|
rlm@441
|
300 #+name: worm-recognition-intro
|
rlm@446
|
301 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 15cm
|
rlm@445
|
302 [[./images/worm-poses.png]]
|
rlm@441
|
303
|
rlm@517
|
304 *** Main Results
|
rlm@517
|
305
|
rlm@521
|
306 - After one-shot supervised training, =EMPATH= was able to
|
rlm@521
|
307 recognize a wide variety of static poses and dynamic
|
rlm@521
|
308 actions---ranging from curling in a circle to wiggling with a
|
rlm@521
|
309 particular frequency --- with 95\% accuracy.
|
rlm@517
|
310
|
rlm@517
|
311 - These results were completely independent of viewing angle
|
rlm@517
|
312 because the underlying body-centered language fundamentally is
|
rlm@517
|
313 independent; once an action is learned, it can be recognized
|
rlm@517
|
314 equally well from any viewing angle.
|
rlm@517
|
315
|
rlm@517
|
316 - =EMPATH= is surprisingly short; the sensorimotor-centered
|
rlm@517
|
317 language provided by =CORTEX= resulted in extremely economical
|
rlm@517
|
318 recognition routines --- about 500 lines in all --- suggesting
|
rlm@517
|
319 that such representations are very powerful, and often
|
rlm@517
|
320 indispensable for the types of recognition tasks considered here.
|
rlm@517
|
321
|
rlm@551
|
322 - For expediency's sake, I relied on direct knowledge of joint
|
rlm@551
|
323 positions in this proof of concept. However, I believe that the
|
rlm@551
|
324 structure of =EMPATH= and =CORTEX= will make future work to
|
rlm@551
|
325 enable video analysis much easier than it would otherwise be.
|
rlm@517
|
326
|
rlm@517
|
327 ** =EMPATH= is built on =CORTEX=, a creature builder.
|
rlm@435
|
328
|
rlm@448
|
329 I built =CORTEX= to be a general AI research platform for doing
|
rlm@448
|
330 experiments involving multiple rich senses and a wide variety and
|
rlm@448
|
331 number of creatures. I intend it to be useful as a library for many
|
rlm@462
|
332 more projects than just this thesis. =CORTEX= was necessary to meet
|
rlm@462
|
333 a need among AI researchers at CSAIL and beyond, which is that
|
rlm@547
|
334 people often will invent wonderful ideas that are best expressed in
|
rlm@547
|
335 the language of creatures and senses, but in order to explore those
|
rlm@448
|
336 ideas they must first build a platform in which they can create
|
rlm@448
|
337 simulated creatures with rich senses! There are many ideas that
|
rlm@547
|
338 would be simple to execute (such as =EMPATH= or Larson's
|
rlm@547
|
339 self-organizing maps (\cite{larson-symbols})), but attached to them
|
rlm@547
|
340 is the multi-month effort to make a good creature simulator. Often,
|
rlm@547
|
341 that initial investment of time proves to be too much, and the
|
rlm@547
|
342 project must make do with a lesser environment or be abandoned
|
rlm@547
|
343 entirely.
|
rlm@435
|
344
|
rlm@448
|
345 =CORTEX= is well suited as an environment for embodied AI research
|
rlm@448
|
346 for three reasons:
|
rlm@448
|
347
|
rlm@547
|
348 - You can design new creatures using Blender (\cite{blender}), a
|
rlm@551
|
349 popular, free 3D modeling program. Each sense can be specified
|
rlm@551
|
350 using special blender nodes with biologically inspired
|
rlm@551
|
351 parameters. You need not write any code to create a creature, and
|
rlm@551
|
352 can use a wide library of pre-existing blender models as a base
|
rlm@551
|
353 for your own creatures.
|
rlm@448
|
354
|
rlm@511
|
355 - =CORTEX= implements a wide variety of senses: touch,
|
rlm@448
|
356 proprioception, vision, hearing, and muscle tension. Complicated
|
rlm@545
|
357 senses like touch and vision involve multiple sensory elements
|
rlm@448
|
358 embedded in a 2D surface. You have complete control over the
|
rlm@448
|
359 distribution of these sensor elements through the use of simple
|
rlm@551
|
360 image files. =CORTEX= implements more comprehensive hearing than
|
rlm@551
|
361 any other creature simulation system available.
|
rlm@448
|
362
|
rlm@448
|
363 - =CORTEX= supports any number of creatures and any number of
|
rlm@517
|
364 senses. Time in =CORTEX= dilates so that the simulated creatures
|
rlm@517
|
365 always perceive a perfectly smooth flow of time, regardless of
|
rlm@448
|
366 the actual computational load.
|
rlm@448
|
367
|
rlm@517
|
368 =CORTEX= is built on top of =jMonkeyEngine3=
|
rlm@517
|
369 (\cite{jmonkeyengine}), which is a video game engine designed to
|
rlm@517
|
370 create cross-platform 3D desktop games. =CORTEX= is mainly written
|
rlm@551
|
371 in clojure, a dialect of =LISP= that runs on the Java Virtual
|
rlm@551
|
372 Machine (JVM). The API for creating and simulating creatures and
|
rlm@517
|
373 senses is entirely expressed in clojure, though many senses are
|
rlm@517
|
374 implemented at the layer of jMonkeyEngine or below. For example,
|
rlm@517
|
375 for the sense of hearing I use a layer of clojure code on top of a
|
rlm@517
|
376 layer of java JNI bindings that drive a layer of =C++= code which
|
rlm@517
|
377 implements a modified version of =OpenAL= to support multiple
|
rlm@517
|
378 listeners. =CORTEX= is the only simulation environment that I know
|
rlm@517
|
379 of that can support multiple entities that can each hear the world
|
rlm@517
|
380 from their own perspective. Other senses also require a small layer
|
rlm@517
|
381 of Java code. =CORTEX= also uses =bullet=, a physics simulator
|
rlm@517
|
382 written in =C=.
|
rlm@448
|
383
|
rlm@516
|
384 #+caption: Here is the worm from figure \ref{worm-intro} modeled
|
rlm@516
|
385 #+caption: in Blender, a free 3D-modeling program. Senses and
|
rlm@516
|
386 #+caption: joints are described using special nodes in Blender.
|
rlm@518
|
387 #+name: worm-recognition-intro-2
|
rlm@448
|
388 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 12cm
|
rlm@448
|
389 [[./images/blender-worm.png]]
|
rlm@448
|
390
|
rlm@521
|
391 Here are some things I anticipate that =CORTEX= might be used for:
|
rlm@449
|
392
|
rlm@449
|
393 - exploring new ideas about sensory integration
|
rlm@449
|
394 - distributed communication among swarm creatures
|
rlm@449
|
395 - self-learning using free exploration,
|
rlm@449
|
396 - evolutionary algorithms involving creature construction
|
rlm@517
|
397 - exploration of exotic senses and effectors that are not possible
|
rlm@517
|
398 in the real world (such as telekinesis or a semantic sense)
|
rlm@449
|
399 - imagination using subworlds
|
rlm@449
|
400
|
rlm@451
|
401 During one test with =CORTEX=, I created 3,000 creatures each with
|
rlm@551
|
402 its own independent senses and ran them all at only 1/80 real time.
|
rlm@551
|
403 In another test, I created a detailed model of my own hand,
|
rlm@448
|
404 equipped with a realistic distribution of touch (more sensitive at
|
rlm@448
|
405 the fingertips), as well as eyes and ears, and it ran at around 1/4
|
rlm@451
|
406 real time.
|
rlm@448
|
407
|
rlm@451
|
408 #+BEGIN_LaTeX
|
rlm@449
|
409 \begin{sidewaysfigure}
|
rlm@449
|
410 \includegraphics[width=9.5in]{images/full-hand.png}
|
rlm@451
|
411 \caption{
|
rlm@451
|
412 I modeled my own right hand in Blender and rigged it with all the
|
rlm@451
|
413 senses that {\tt CORTEX} supports. My simulated hand has a
|
rlm@451
|
414 biologically inspired distribution of touch sensors. The senses are
|
rlm@451
|
415 displayed on the right, and the simulation is displayed on the
|
rlm@451
|
416 left. Notice that my hand is curling its fingers, that it can see
|
rlm@451
|
417 its own finger from the eye in its palm, and that it can feel its
|
rlm@451
|
418 own thumb touching its palm.}
|
rlm@449
|
419 \end{sidewaysfigure}
|
rlm@451
|
420 #+END_LaTeX
|
rlm@448
|
421
|
rlm@551
|
422 * COMMENT Designing =CORTEX=
|
rlm@551
|
423
|
rlm@551
|
424 In this chapter, I outline the design decisions that went into
|
rlm@516
|
425 making =CORTEX=, along with some details about its implementation.
|
rlm@516
|
426 (A practical guide to getting started with =CORTEX=, which skips
|
rlm@516
|
427 over the history and implementation details presented here, is
|
rlm@516
|
428 provided in an appendix at the end of this thesis.)
|
rlm@511
|
429
|
rlm@511
|
430 Throughout this project, I intended for =CORTEX= to be flexible and
|
rlm@511
|
431 extensible enough to be useful for other researchers who want to
|
rlm@547
|
432 test ideas of their own. To this end, wherever I have had to make
|
rlm@517
|
433 architectural choices about =CORTEX=, I have chosen to give as much
|
rlm@511
|
434 freedom to the user as possible, so that =CORTEX= may be used for
|
rlm@517
|
435 things I have not foreseen.
|
rlm@511
|
436
|
rlm@511
|
437 ** Building in simulation versus reality
|
rlm@517
|
438 The most important architectural decision of all is the choice to
|
rlm@517
|
439 use a computer-simulated environment in the first place! The world
|
rlm@462
|
440 is a vast and rich place, and for now simulations are a very poor
|
rlm@462
|
441 reflection of its complexity. It may be that there is a significant
|
rlm@517
|
442 qualitative difference between dealing with senses in the real
|
rlm@517
|
443 world and dealing with pale facsimiles of them in a simulation
|
rlm@547
|
444 (\cite{brooks-representation}). What are the advantages and
|
rlm@514
|
445 disadvantages of a simulation vs. reality?
|
rlm@515
|
446
|
rlm@462
|
447 *** Simulation
|
rlm@462
|
448
|
rlm@462
|
449 The advantages of virtual reality are that when everything is a
|
rlm@462
|
450 simulation, experiments in that simulation are absolutely
|
rlm@547
|
451 reproducible. It's also easier to change the creature and
|
rlm@547
|
452 environment to explore new situations and different sensory
|
rlm@547
|
453 combinations.
|
rlm@462
|
454
|
rlm@462
|
455 If the world is to be simulated on a computer, then not only do
|
rlm@547
|
456 you have to worry about whether the creature's senses are rich
|
rlm@462
|
457 enough to learn from the world, but whether the world itself is
|
rlm@462
|
458 rendered with enough detail and realism to give enough working
|
rlm@547
|
459 material to the creature's senses. To name just a few
|
rlm@462
|
460 difficulties facing modern physics simulators: destructibility of
|
rlm@462
|
461 the environment, simulation of water/other fluids, large areas,
|
rlm@462
|
462 nonrigid bodies, lots of objects, smoke. I don't know of any
|
rlm@547
|
463 computer simulation that would allow a creature to take a rock
|
rlm@462
|
464 and grind it into fine dust, then use that dust to make a clay
|
rlm@462
|
465 sculpture, at least not without spending years calculating the
|
rlm@462
|
466 interactions of every single small grain of dust. Maybe a
|
rlm@462
|
467 simulated world with today's limitations doesn't provide enough
|
rlm@462
|
468 richness for real intelligence to evolve.
|
rlm@462
|
469
|
rlm@462
|
470 *** Reality
|
rlm@462
|
471
|
rlm@462
|
472 The other approach for playing with senses is to hook your
|
rlm@462
|
473 software up to real cameras, microphones, robots, etc., and let it
|
rlm@462
|
474 loose in the real world. This has the advantage of eliminating
|
rlm@462
|
475 concerns about simulating the world at the expense of increasing
|
rlm@462
|
476 the complexity of implementing the senses. Instead of just
|
rlm@462
|
477 grabbing the current rendered frame for processing, you have to
|
rlm@462
|
478 use an actual camera with real lenses and interact with photons to
|
rlm@547
|
479 get an image. It is much harder to change the creature, which is
|
rlm@462
|
480 now partly a physical robot of some sort, since doing so involves
|
rlm@462
|
481 changing things around in the real world instead of modifying
|
rlm@462
|
482 lines of code. While the real world is very rich and definitely
|
rlm@547
|
483 provides enough stimulation for intelligence to develop (as
|
rlm@547
|
484 evidenced by our own existence), it is also uncontrollable in the
|
rlm@462
|
485 sense that a particular situation cannot be recreated perfectly or
|
rlm@547
|
486 saved for later use. It is harder to conduct Science because it is
|
rlm@462
|
487 harder to repeat an experiment. The worst thing about using the
|
rlm@462
|
488 real world instead of a simulation is the matter of time. Instead
|
rlm@462
|
489 of simulated time you get the constant and unstoppable flow of
|
rlm@462
|
490 real time. This severely limits the sorts of software you can use
|
rlm@525
|
491 to program an AI, because all sense inputs must be handled in real
|
rlm@462
|
492 time. Complicated ideas may have to be implemented in hardware or
|
rlm@462
|
493 may simply be impossible given the current speed of our
|
rlm@462
|
494 processors. Contrast this with a simulation, in which the flow of
|
rlm@462
|
495 time in the simulated world can be slowed down to accommodate the
|
rlm@547
|
496 limitations of the creature's programming. In terms of cost, doing
|
rlm@547
|
497 everything in software is far cheaper than building custom
|
rlm@462
|
498 real-time hardware. All you need is a laptop and some patience.
|
rlm@515
|
499
|
rlm@516
|
500 ** Simulated time enables rapid prototyping \& simple programs
|
rlm@435
|
501
|
rlm@462
|
502 I envision =CORTEX= being used to support rapid prototyping and
|
rlm@462
|
503 iteration of ideas. Even if I could put together a well constructed
|
rlm@462
|
504 kit for creating robots, it would still not be enough because of
|
rlm@462
|
505 the scourge of real-time processing. Anyone who wants to test their
|
rlm@462
|
506 ideas in the real world must always worry about getting their
|
rlm@465
|
507 algorithms to run fast enough to process information in real time.
|
rlm@465
|
508 The need for real time processing only increases if multiple senses
|
rlm@465
|
509 are involved. In the extreme case, even simple algorithms will have
|
rlm@465
|
510 to be accelerated by ASIC chips or FPGAs, turning what would
|
rlm@517
|
511 otherwise be a few lines of code and a 10x speed penalty into a
|
rlm@465
|
512 multi-month ordeal. For this reason, =CORTEX= supports
|
rlm@547
|
513 /time-dilation/, which scales back the framerate of the simulation
|
rlm@547
|
514 in proportion to the amount of processing each frame. From the
|
rlm@547
|
515 perspective of the creatures inside the simulation, time always
|
rlm@547
|
516 appears to flow at a constant rate, regardless of how complicated
|
rlm@547
|
517 the environment becomes or how many creatures are in the
|
rlm@547
|
518 simulation. The cost is that =CORTEX= can sometimes run slower than
|
rlm@548
|
519 real time. Time dilation works both ways, however --- simulations
|
rlm@547
|
520 of very simple creatures in =CORTEX= generally run at 40x real-time
|
rlm@547
|
521 on my machine!
|
rlm@462
|
522
|
rlm@511
|
523 ** All sense organs are two-dimensional surfaces
|
rlm@514
|
524
|
rlm@468
|
525 If =CORTEX= is to support a wide variety of senses, it would help
|
rlm@547
|
526 to have a better understanding of what a sense actually is! While
|
rlm@547
|
527 vision, touch, and hearing all seem like they are quite different
|
rlm@547
|
528 things, I was surprised to learn during the course of this thesis
|
rlm@547
|
529 that they (and all physical senses) can be expressed as exactly the
|
rlm@547
|
530 same mathematical object!
|
rlm@468
|
531
|
rlm@468
|
532 Human beings are three-dimensional objects, and the nerves that
|
rlm@468
|
533 transmit data from our various sense organs to our brain are
|
rlm@468
|
534 essentially one-dimensional. This leaves up to two dimensions in
|
rlm@468
|
535 which our sensory information may flow. For example, imagine your
|
rlm@468
|
536 skin: it is a two-dimensional surface around a three-dimensional
|
rlm@468
|
537 object (your body). It has discrete touch sensors embedded at
|
rlm@468
|
538 various points, and the density of these sensors corresponds to the
|
rlm@468
|
539 sensitivity of that region of skin. Each touch sensor connects to a
|
rlm@468
|
540 nerve, all of which eventually are bundled together as they travel
|
rlm@468
|
541 up the spinal cord to the brain. Intersect the spinal nerves with a
|
rlm@468
|
542 guillotining plane and you will see all of the sensory data of the
|
rlm@468
|
543 skin revealed in a roughly circular two-dimensional image which is
|
rlm@468
|
544 the cross section of the spinal cord. Points on this image that are
|
rlm@468
|
545 close together in this circle represent touch sensors that are
|
rlm@468
|
546 /probably/ close together on the skin, although there is of course
|
rlm@468
|
547 some cutting and rearrangement that has to be done to transfer the
|
rlm@468
|
548 complicated surface of the skin onto a two dimensional image.
|
rlm@468
|
549
|
rlm@468
|
550 Most human senses consist of many discrete sensors of various
|
rlm@468
|
551 properties distributed along a surface at various densities. For
|
rlm@468
|
552 skin, it is Pacinian corpuscles, Meissner's corpuscles, Merkel's
|
rlm@547
|
553 disks, and Ruffini's endings (\cite{textbook901}), which detect
|
rlm@517
|
554 pressure and vibration of various intensities. For ears, it is the
|
rlm@517
|
555 stereocilia distributed along the basilar membrane inside the
|
rlm@517
|
556 cochlea; each one is sensitive to a slightly different frequency of
|
rlm@517
|
557 sound. For eyes, it is rods and cones distributed along the surface
|
rlm@517
|
558 of the retina. In each case, we can describe the sense with a
|
rlm@517
|
559 surface and a distribution of sensors along that surface.
|
rlm@468
|
560
|
rlm@525
|
561 In fact, almost every human sense can be effectively described in
|
rlm@525
|
562 terms of a surface containing embedded sensors. If the sense had
|
rlm@525
|
563 any more dimensions, then there wouldn't be enough room in the
|
rlm@547
|
564 spinal cord to transmit the information!
|
rlm@468
|
565
|
rlm@468
|
566 Therefore, =CORTEX= must support the ability to create objects and
|
rlm@468
|
567 then be able to ``paint'' points along their surfaces to describe
|
rlm@468
|
568 each sense.
|
rlm@468
|
569
|
rlm@468
|
570 Fortunately this idea is already a well known computer graphics
|
rlm@548
|
571 technique called /UV-mapping/. In UV-mapping, the three-dimensional
|
rlm@547
|
572 surface of a model is cut and smooshed until it fits on a
|
rlm@547
|
573 two-dimensional image. You paint whatever you want on that image,
|
rlm@547
|
574 and when the three-dimensional shape is rendered in a game the
|
rlm@547
|
575 smooshing and cutting is reversed and the image appears on the
|
rlm@547
|
576 three-dimensional object.
|
rlm@468
|
577
|
rlm@468
|
578 To make a sense, interpret the UV-image as describing the
|
rlm@468
|
579 distribution of that senses sensors. To get different types of
|
rlm@468
|
580 sensors, you can either use a different color for each type of
|
rlm@468
|
581 sensor, or use multiple UV-maps, each labeled with that sensor
|
rlm@468
|
582 type. I generally use a white pixel to mean the presence of a
|
rlm@468
|
583 sensor and a black pixel to mean the absence of a sensor, and use
|
rlm@468
|
584 one UV-map for each sensor-type within a given sense.
|
rlm@468
|
585
|
rlm@468
|
586 #+CAPTION: The UV-map for an elongated icososphere. The white
|
rlm@468
|
587 #+caption: dots each represent a touch sensor. They are dense
|
rlm@468
|
588 #+caption: in the regions that describe the tip of the finger,
|
rlm@468
|
589 #+caption: and less dense along the dorsal side of the finger
|
rlm@468
|
590 #+caption: opposite the tip.
|
rlm@468
|
591 #+name: finger-UV
|
rlm@468
|
592 #+ATTR_latex: :width 10cm
|
rlm@468
|
593 [[./images/finger-UV.png]]
|
rlm@468
|
594
|
rlm@468
|
595 #+caption: Ventral side of the UV-mapped finger. Notice the
|
rlm@468
|
596 #+caption: density of touch sensors at the tip.
|
rlm@468
|
597 #+name: finger-side-view
|
rlm@468
|
598 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@468
|
599 [[./images/finger-1.png]]
|
rlm@468
|
600
|
rlm@507
|
601 ** Video game engines provide ready-made physics and shading
|
rlm@462
|
602
|
rlm@462
|
603 I did not need to write my own physics simulation code or shader to
|
rlm@462
|
604 build =CORTEX=. Doing so would lead to a system that is impossible
|
rlm@462
|
605 for anyone but myself to use anyway. Instead, I use a video game
|
rlm@517
|
606 engine as a base and modify it to accommodate the additional needs
|
rlm@462
|
607 of =CORTEX=. Video game engines are an ideal starting point to
|
rlm@462
|
608 build =CORTEX=, because they are not far from being creature
|
rlm@463
|
609 building systems themselves.
|
rlm@462
|
610
|
rlm@462
|
611 First off, general purpose video game engines come with a physics
|
rlm@462
|
612 engine and lighting / sound system. The physics system provides
|
rlm@462
|
613 tools that can be co-opted to serve as touch, proprioception, and
|
rlm@462
|
614 muscles. Since some games support split screen views, a good video
|
rlm@462
|
615 game engine will allow you to efficiently create multiple cameras
|
rlm@463
|
616 in the simulated world that can be used as eyes. Video game systems
|
rlm@463
|
617 offer integrated asset management for things like textures and
|
rlm@547
|
618 creature models, providing an avenue for defining creatures. They
|
rlm@468
|
619 also understand UV-mapping, since this technique is used to apply a
|
rlm@468
|
620 texture to a model. Finally, because video game engines support a
|
rlm@547
|
621 large number of developers, as long as =CORTEX= doesn't stray too
|
rlm@547
|
622 far from the base system, other researchers can turn to this
|
rlm@547
|
623 community for help when doing their research.
|
rlm@463
|
624
|
rlm@507
|
625 ** =CORTEX= is based on jMonkeyEngine3
|
rlm@463
|
626
|
rlm@463
|
627 While preparing to build =CORTEX= I studied several video game
|
rlm@463
|
628 engines to see which would best serve as a base. The top contenders
|
rlm@463
|
629 were:
|
rlm@463
|
630
|
rlm@547
|
631 - [[http://www.idsoftware.com][Quake II]]/[[http://www.bytonic.de/html/jake2.html][Jake2]] :: The Quake II engine was designed by ID software
|
rlm@547
|
632 in 1997. All the source code was released by ID software into
|
rlm@547
|
633 the Public Domain several years ago, and as a result it has
|
rlm@547
|
634 been ported to many different languages. This engine was
|
rlm@547
|
635 famous for its advanced use of realistic shading and it had
|
rlm@547
|
636 decent and fast physics simulation. The main advantage of the
|
rlm@547
|
637 Quake II engine is its simplicity, but I ultimately rejected
|
rlm@547
|
638 it because the engine is too tied to the concept of a
|
rlm@463
|
639 first-person shooter game. One of the problems I had was that
|
rlm@463
|
640 there does not seem to be any easy way to attach multiple
|
rlm@463
|
641 cameras to a single character. There are also several physics
|
rlm@463
|
642 clipping issues that are corrected in a way that only applies
|
rlm@463
|
643 to the main character and do not apply to arbitrary objects.
|
rlm@463
|
644
|
rlm@463
|
645 - [[http://source.valvesoftware.com/][Source Engine]] :: The Source Engine evolved from the Quake II
|
rlm@463
|
646 and Quake I engines and is used by Valve in the Half-Life
|
rlm@463
|
647 series of games. The physics simulation in the Source Engine
|
rlm@463
|
648 is quite accurate and probably the best out of all the engines
|
rlm@463
|
649 I investigated. There is also an extensive community actively
|
rlm@463
|
650 working with the engine. However, applications that use the
|
rlm@463
|
651 Source Engine must be written in C++, the code is not open, it
|
rlm@463
|
652 only runs on Windows, and the tools that come with the SDK to
|
rlm@463
|
653 handle models and textures are complicated and awkward to use.
|
rlm@463
|
654
|
rlm@463
|
655 - [[http://jmonkeyengine.com/][jMonkeyEngine3]] :: jMonkeyEngine3 is a new library for creating
|
rlm@463
|
656 games in Java. It uses OpenGL to render to the screen and uses
|
rlm@463
|
657 screengraphs to avoid drawing things that do not appear on the
|
rlm@463
|
658 screen. It has an active community and several games in the
|
rlm@463
|
659 pipeline. The engine was not built to serve any particular
|
rlm@463
|
660 game but is instead meant to be used for any 3D game.
|
rlm@463
|
661
|
rlm@521
|
662 I chose jMonkeyEngine3 because it had the most features out of all
|
rlm@521
|
663 the free projects I looked at, and because I could then write my
|
rlm@521
|
664 code in clojure, an implementation of =LISP= that runs on the JVM.
|
rlm@435
|
665
|
rlm@507
|
666 ** =CORTEX= uses Blender to create creature models
|
rlm@435
|
667
|
rlm@464
|
668 For the simple worm-like creatures I will use later on in this
|
rlm@464
|
669 thesis, I could define a simple API in =CORTEX= that would allow
|
rlm@464
|
670 one to create boxes, spheres, etc., and leave that API as the sole
|
rlm@464
|
671 way to create creatures. However, for =CORTEX= to truly be useful
|
rlm@468
|
672 for other projects, it needs a way to construct complicated
|
rlm@464
|
673 creatures. If possible, it would be nice to leverage work that has
|
rlm@464
|
674 already been done by the community of 3D modelers, or at least
|
rlm@517
|
675 enable people who are talented at modeling but not programming to
|
rlm@468
|
676 design =CORTEX= creatures.
|
rlm@464
|
677
|
rlm@547
|
678 Therefore I use Blender, a free 3D modeling program, as the main
|
rlm@464
|
679 way to create creatures in =CORTEX=. However, the creatures modeled
|
rlm@464
|
680 in Blender must also be simple to simulate in jMonkeyEngine3's game
|
rlm@468
|
681 engine, and must also be easy to rig with =CORTEX='s senses. I
|
rlm@547
|
682 accomplish this with extensive use of Blender's ``empty nodes.''
|
rlm@464
|
683
|
rlm@468
|
684 Empty nodes have no mass, physical presence, or appearance, but
|
rlm@468
|
685 they can hold metadata and have names. I use a tree structure of
|
rlm@468
|
686 empty nodes to specify senses in the following manner:
|
rlm@468
|
687
|
rlm@468
|
688 - Create a single top-level empty node whose name is the name of
|
rlm@468
|
689 the sense.
|
rlm@468
|
690 - Add empty nodes which each contain meta-data relevant to the
|
rlm@468
|
691 sense, including a UV-map describing the number/distribution of
|
rlm@468
|
692 sensors if applicable.
|
rlm@468
|
693 - Make each empty-node the child of the top-level node.
|
rlm@468
|
694
|
rlm@517
|
695 #+caption: An example of annotating a creature model with empty
|
rlm@468
|
696 #+caption: nodes to describe the layout of senses. There are
|
rlm@468
|
697 #+caption: multiple empty nodes which each describe the position
|
rlm@468
|
698 #+caption: of muscles, ears, eyes, or joints.
|
rlm@468
|
699 #+name: sense-nodes
|
rlm@468
|
700 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@468
|
701 [[./images/empty-sense-nodes.png]]
|
rlm@468
|
702
|
rlm@508
|
703 ** Bodies are composed of segments connected by joints
|
rlm@468
|
704
|
rlm@468
|
705 Blender is a general purpose animation tool, which has been used in
|
rlm@468
|
706 the past to create high quality movies such as Sintel
|
rlm@547
|
707 (\cite{blender}). Though Blender can model and render even
|
rlm@547
|
708 complicated things like water, it is crucial to keep models that
|
rlm@547
|
709 are meant to be simulated as creatures simple. =Bullet=, which
|
rlm@547
|
710 =CORTEX= uses though jMonkeyEngine3, is a rigid-body physics
|
rlm@547
|
711 system. This offers a compromise between the expressiveness of a
|
rlm@547
|
712 game level and the speed at which it can be simulated, and it means
|
rlm@547
|
713 that creatures should be naturally expressed as rigid components
|
rlm@547
|
714 held together by joint constraints.
|
rlm@468
|
715
|
rlm@517
|
716 But humans are more like a squishy bag wrapped around some hard
|
rlm@517
|
717 bones which define the overall shape. When we move, our skin bends
|
rlm@517
|
718 and stretches to accommodate the new positions of our bones.
|
rlm@468
|
719
|
rlm@468
|
720 One way to make bodies composed of rigid pieces connected by joints
|
rlm@468
|
721 /seem/ more human-like is to use an /armature/, (or /rigging/)
|
rlm@468
|
722 system, which defines a overall ``body mesh'' and defines how the
|
rlm@468
|
723 mesh deforms as a function of the position of each ``bone'' which
|
rlm@468
|
724 is a standard rigid body. This technique is used extensively to
|
rlm@468
|
725 model humans and create realistic animations. It is not a good
|
rlm@517
|
726 technique for physical simulation because it is a lie -- the skin
|
rlm@517
|
727 is not a physical part of the simulation and does not interact with
|
rlm@517
|
728 any objects in the world or itself. Objects will pass right though
|
rlm@517
|
729 the skin until they come in contact with the underlying bone, which
|
rlm@517
|
730 is a physical object. Without simulating the skin, the sense of
|
rlm@517
|
731 touch has little meaning, and the creature's own vision will lie to
|
rlm@517
|
732 it about the true extent of its body. Simulating the skin as a
|
rlm@517
|
733 physical object requires some way to continuously update the
|
rlm@517
|
734 physical model of the skin along with the movement of the bones,
|
rlm@517
|
735 which is unacceptably slow compared to rigid body simulation.
|
rlm@468
|
736
|
rlm@547
|
737 Therefore, instead of using the human-like ``bony meatbag''
|
rlm@547
|
738 approach, I decided to base my body plans on multiple solid objects
|
rlm@547
|
739 that are connected by joints, inspired by the robot =EVE= from the
|
rlm@547
|
740 movie WALL-E.
|
rlm@464
|
741
|
rlm@464
|
742 #+caption: =EVE= from the movie WALL-E. This body plan turns
|
rlm@464
|
743 #+caption: out to be much better suited to my purposes than a more
|
rlm@464
|
744 #+caption: human-like one.
|
rlm@465
|
745 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@464
|
746 [[./images/Eve.jpg]]
|
rlm@464
|
747
|
rlm@464
|
748 =EVE='s body is composed of several rigid components that are held
|
rlm@464
|
749 together by invisible joint constraints. This is what I mean by
|
rlm@547
|
750 /eve-like/. The main reason that I use eve-like bodies is for
|
rlm@547
|
751 simulation efficiency, and so that there will be correspondence
|
rlm@547
|
752 between the AI's senses and the physical presence of its body. Each
|
rlm@547
|
753 individual section is simulated by a separate rigid body that
|
rlm@547
|
754 corresponds exactly with its visual representation and does not
|
rlm@547
|
755 change. Sections are connected by invisible joints that are well
|
rlm@547
|
756 supported in jMonkeyEngine3. Bullet, the physics backend for
|
rlm@547
|
757 jMonkeyEngine3, can efficiently simulate hundreds of rigid bodies
|
rlm@547
|
758 connected by joints. Just because sections are rigid does not mean
|
rlm@547
|
759 they have to stay as one piece forever; they can be dynamically
|
rlm@547
|
760 replaced with multiple sections to simulate splitting in two. This
|
rlm@547
|
761 could be used to simulate retractable claws or =EVE='s hands, which
|
rlm@547
|
762 are able to coalesce into one object in the movie.
|
rlm@465
|
763
|
rlm@469
|
764 *** Solidifying/Connecting a body
|
rlm@465
|
765
|
rlm@469
|
766 =CORTEX= creates a creature in two steps: first, it traverses the
|
rlm@469
|
767 nodes in the blender file and creates physical representations for
|
rlm@469
|
768 any of them that have mass defined in their blender meta-data.
|
rlm@466
|
769
|
rlm@466
|
770 #+caption: Program for iterating through the nodes in a blender file
|
rlm@466
|
771 #+caption: and generating physical jMonkeyEngine3 objects with mass
|
rlm@466
|
772 #+caption: and a matching physics shape.
|
rlm@518
|
773 #+name: physical
|
rlm@466
|
774 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@466
|
775 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@466
|
776 (defn physical!
|
rlm@466
|
777 "Iterate through the nodes in creature and make them real physical
|
rlm@466
|
778 objects in the simulation."
|
rlm@466
|
779 [#^Node creature]
|
rlm@466
|
780 (dorun
|
rlm@466
|
781 (map
|
rlm@466
|
782 (fn [geom]
|
rlm@466
|
783 (let [physics-control
|
rlm@466
|
784 (RigidBodyControl.
|
rlm@466
|
785 (HullCollisionShape.
|
rlm@466
|
786 (.getMesh geom))
|
rlm@466
|
787 (if-let [mass (meta-data geom "mass")]
|
rlm@466
|
788 (float mass) (float 1)))]
|
rlm@466
|
789 (.addControl geom physics-control)))
|
rlm@466
|
790 (filter #(isa? (class %) Geometry )
|
rlm@466
|
791 (node-seq creature)))))
|
rlm@466
|
792 #+end_src
|
rlm@466
|
793 #+end_listing
|
rlm@465
|
794
|
rlm@469
|
795 The next step to making a proper body is to connect those pieces
|
rlm@469
|
796 together with joints. jMonkeyEngine has a large array of joints
|
rlm@469
|
797 available via =bullet=, such as Point2Point, Cone, Hinge, and a
|
rlm@469
|
798 generic Six Degree of Freedom joint, with or without spring
|
rlm@469
|
799 restitution.
|
rlm@465
|
800
|
rlm@469
|
801 Joints are treated a lot like proper senses, in that there is a
|
rlm@469
|
802 top-level empty node named ``joints'' whose children each
|
rlm@469
|
803 represent a joint.
|
rlm@466
|
804
|
rlm@469
|
805 #+caption: View of the hand model in Blender showing the main ``joints''
|
rlm@469
|
806 #+caption: node (highlighted in yellow) and its children which each
|
rlm@469
|
807 #+caption: represent a joint in the hand. Each joint node has metadata
|
rlm@469
|
808 #+caption: specifying what sort of joint it is.
|
rlm@469
|
809 #+name: blender-hand
|
rlm@469
|
810 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@469
|
811 [[./images/hand-screenshot1.png]]
|
rlm@469
|
812
|
rlm@469
|
813
|
rlm@469
|
814 =CORTEX='s procedure for binding the creature together with joints
|
rlm@469
|
815 is as follows:
|
rlm@469
|
816
|
rlm@469
|
817 - Find the children of the ``joints'' node.
|
rlm@469
|
818 - Determine the two spatials the joint is meant to connect.
|
rlm@469
|
819 - Create the joint based on the meta-data of the empty node.
|
rlm@469
|
820
|
rlm@469
|
821 The higher order function =sense-nodes= from =cortex.sense=
|
rlm@469
|
822 simplifies finding the joints based on their parent ``joints''
|
rlm@469
|
823 node.
|
rlm@466
|
824
|
rlm@466
|
825 #+caption: Retrieving the children empty nodes from a single
|
rlm@466
|
826 #+caption: named empty node is a common pattern in =CORTEX=
|
rlm@466
|
827 #+caption: further instances of this technique for the senses
|
rlm@466
|
828 #+caption: will be omitted
|
rlm@466
|
829 #+name: get-empty-nodes
|
rlm@466
|
830 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@466
|
831 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@466
|
832 (defn sense-nodes
|
rlm@466
|
833 "For some senses there is a special empty blender node whose
|
rlm@466
|
834 children are considered markers for an instance of that sense. This
|
rlm@466
|
835 function generates functions to find those children, given the name
|
rlm@466
|
836 of the special parent node."
|
rlm@466
|
837 [parent-name]
|
rlm@466
|
838 (fn [#^Node creature]
|
rlm@466
|
839 (if-let [sense-node (.getChild creature parent-name)]
|
rlm@466
|
840 (seq (.getChildren sense-node)) [])))
|
rlm@466
|
841
|
rlm@466
|
842 (def
|
rlm@466
|
843 ^{:doc "Return the children of the creature's \"joints\" node."
|
rlm@466
|
844 :arglists '([creature])}
|
rlm@466
|
845 joints
|
rlm@466
|
846 (sense-nodes "joints"))
|
rlm@466
|
847 #+end_src
|
rlm@466
|
848 #+end_listing
|
rlm@466
|
849
|
rlm@469
|
850 To find a joint's targets, =CORTEX= creates a small cube, centered
|
rlm@469
|
851 around the empty-node, and grows the cube exponentially until it
|
rlm@469
|
852 intersects two physical objects. The objects are ordered according
|
rlm@469
|
853 to the joint's rotation, with the first one being the object that
|
rlm@469
|
854 has more negative coordinates in the joint's reference frame.
|
rlm@469
|
855 Since the objects must be physical, the empty-node itself escapes
|
rlm@469
|
856 detection. Because the objects must be physical, =joint-targets=
|
rlm@469
|
857 must be called /after/ =physical!= is called.
|
rlm@464
|
858
|
rlm@469
|
859 #+caption: Program to find the targets of a joint node by
|
rlm@517
|
860 #+caption: exponentially growth of a search cube.
|
rlm@469
|
861 #+name: joint-targets
|
rlm@469
|
862 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@469
|
863 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@466
|
864 (defn joint-targets
|
rlm@466
|
865 "Return the two closest two objects to the joint object, ordered
|
rlm@466
|
866 from bottom to top according to the joint's rotation."
|
rlm@466
|
867 [#^Node parts #^Node joint]
|
rlm@466
|
868 (loop [radius (float 0.01)]
|
rlm@466
|
869 (let [results (CollisionResults.)]
|
rlm@466
|
870 (.collideWith
|
rlm@466
|
871 parts
|
rlm@466
|
872 (BoundingBox. (.getWorldTranslation joint)
|
rlm@466
|
873 radius radius radius) results)
|
rlm@466
|
874 (let [targets
|
rlm@466
|
875 (distinct
|
rlm@466
|
876 (map #(.getGeometry %) results))]
|
rlm@466
|
877 (if (>= (count targets) 2)
|
rlm@466
|
878 (sort-by
|
rlm@466
|
879 #(let [joint-ref-frame-position
|
rlm@466
|
880 (jme-to-blender
|
rlm@466
|
881 (.mult
|
rlm@466
|
882 (.inverse (.getWorldRotation joint))
|
rlm@466
|
883 (.subtract (.getWorldTranslation %)
|
rlm@466
|
884 (.getWorldTranslation joint))))]
|
rlm@466
|
885 (.dot (Vector3f. 1 1 1) joint-ref-frame-position))
|
rlm@466
|
886 (take 2 targets))
|
rlm@466
|
887 (recur (float (* radius 2))))))))
|
rlm@469
|
888 #+end_src
|
rlm@469
|
889 #+end_listing
|
rlm@464
|
890
|
rlm@469
|
891 Once =CORTEX= finds all joints and targets, it creates them using
|
rlm@469
|
892 a dispatch on the metadata of each joint node.
|
rlm@466
|
893
|
rlm@469
|
894 #+caption: Program to dispatch on blender metadata and create joints
|
rlm@517
|
895 #+caption: suitable for physical simulation.
|
rlm@469
|
896 #+name: joint-dispatch
|
rlm@469
|
897 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@469
|
898 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@466
|
899 (defmulti joint-dispatch
|
rlm@466
|
900 "Translate blender pseudo-joints into real JME joints."
|
rlm@466
|
901 (fn [constraints & _]
|
rlm@466
|
902 (:type constraints)))
|
rlm@466
|
903
|
rlm@466
|
904 (defmethod joint-dispatch :point
|
rlm@466
|
905 [constraints control-a control-b pivot-a pivot-b rotation]
|
rlm@466
|
906 (doto (SixDofJoint. control-a control-b pivot-a pivot-b false)
|
rlm@466
|
907 (.setLinearLowerLimit Vector3f/ZERO)
|
rlm@466
|
908 (.setLinearUpperLimit Vector3f/ZERO)))
|
rlm@466
|
909
|
rlm@466
|
910 (defmethod joint-dispatch :hinge
|
rlm@466
|
911 [constraints control-a control-b pivot-a pivot-b rotation]
|
rlm@466
|
912 (let [axis (if-let [axis (:axis constraints)] axis Vector3f/UNIT_X)
|
rlm@466
|
913 [limit-1 limit-2] (:limit constraints)
|
rlm@466
|
914 hinge-axis (.mult rotation (blender-to-jme axis))]
|
rlm@466
|
915 (doto (HingeJoint. control-a control-b pivot-a pivot-b
|
rlm@466
|
916 hinge-axis hinge-axis)
|
rlm@466
|
917 (.setLimit limit-1 limit-2))))
|
rlm@466
|
918
|
rlm@466
|
919 (defmethod joint-dispatch :cone
|
rlm@466
|
920 [constraints control-a control-b pivot-a pivot-b rotation]
|
rlm@466
|
921 (let [limit-xz (:limit-xz constraints)
|
rlm@466
|
922 limit-xy (:limit-xy constraints)
|
rlm@466
|
923 twist (:twist constraints)]
|
rlm@466
|
924 (doto (ConeJoint. control-a control-b pivot-a pivot-b
|
rlm@466
|
925 rotation rotation)
|
rlm@466
|
926 (.setLimit (float limit-xz) (float limit-xy)
|
rlm@466
|
927 (float twist)))))
|
rlm@469
|
928 #+end_src
|
rlm@469
|
929 #+end_listing
|
rlm@466
|
930
|
rlm@522
|
931 All that is left for joints is to combine the above pieces into
|
rlm@469
|
932 something that can operate on the collection of nodes that a
|
rlm@469
|
933 blender file represents.
|
rlm@466
|
934
|
rlm@469
|
935 #+caption: Program to completely create a joint given information
|
rlm@469
|
936 #+caption: from a blender file.
|
rlm@469
|
937 #+name: connect
|
rlm@469
|
938 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@466
|
939 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@466
|
940 (defn connect
|
rlm@466
|
941 "Create a joint between 'obj-a and 'obj-b at the location of
|
rlm@466
|
942 'joint. The type of joint is determined by the metadata on 'joint.
|
rlm@466
|
943
|
rlm@466
|
944 Here are some examples:
|
rlm@466
|
945 {:type :point}
|
rlm@466
|
946 {:type :hinge :limit [0 (/ Math/PI 2)] :axis (Vector3f. 0 1 0)}
|
rlm@466
|
947 (:axis defaults to (Vector3f. 1 0 0) if not provided for hinge joints)
|
rlm@466
|
948
|
rlm@466
|
949 {:type :cone :limit-xz 0]
|
rlm@466
|
950 :limit-xy 0]
|
rlm@466
|
951 :twist 0]} (use XZY rotation mode in blender!)"
|
rlm@466
|
952 [#^Node obj-a #^Node obj-b #^Node joint]
|
rlm@466
|
953 (let [control-a (.getControl obj-a RigidBodyControl)
|
rlm@466
|
954 control-b (.getControl obj-b RigidBodyControl)
|
rlm@466
|
955 joint-center (.getWorldTranslation joint)
|
rlm@466
|
956 joint-rotation (.toRotationMatrix (.getWorldRotation joint))
|
rlm@466
|
957 pivot-a (world-to-local obj-a joint-center)
|
rlm@466
|
958 pivot-b (world-to-local obj-b joint-center)]
|
rlm@466
|
959 (if-let
|
rlm@466
|
960 [constraints (map-vals eval (read-string (meta-data joint "joint")))]
|
rlm@466
|
961 ;; A side-effect of creating a joint registers
|
rlm@466
|
962 ;; it with both physics objects which in turn
|
rlm@466
|
963 ;; will register the joint with the physics system
|
rlm@466
|
964 ;; when the simulation is started.
|
rlm@466
|
965 (joint-dispatch constraints
|
rlm@466
|
966 control-a control-b
|
rlm@466
|
967 pivot-a pivot-b
|
rlm@466
|
968 joint-rotation))))
|
rlm@469
|
969 #+end_src
|
rlm@469
|
970 #+end_listing
|
rlm@466
|
971
|
rlm@469
|
972 In general, whenever =CORTEX= exposes a sense (or in this case
|
rlm@469
|
973 physicality), it provides a function of the type =sense!=, which
|
rlm@469
|
974 takes in a collection of nodes and augments it to support that
|
rlm@517
|
975 sense. The function returns any controls necessary to use that
|
rlm@517
|
976 sense. In this case =body!= creates a physical body and returns no
|
rlm@469
|
977 control functions.
|
rlm@466
|
978
|
rlm@469
|
979 #+caption: Program to give joints to a creature.
|
rlm@518
|
980 #+name: joints
|
rlm@469
|
981 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@469
|
982 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@466
|
983 (defn joints!
|
rlm@466
|
984 "Connect the solid parts of the creature with physical joints. The
|
rlm@466
|
985 joints are taken from the \"joints\" node in the creature."
|
rlm@466
|
986 [#^Node creature]
|
rlm@466
|
987 (dorun
|
rlm@466
|
988 (map
|
rlm@466
|
989 (fn [joint]
|
rlm@466
|
990 (let [[obj-a obj-b] (joint-targets creature joint)]
|
rlm@466
|
991 (connect obj-a obj-b joint)))
|
rlm@466
|
992 (joints creature))))
|
rlm@466
|
993 (defn body!
|
rlm@466
|
994 "Endow the creature with a physical body connected with joints. The
|
rlm@466
|
995 particulars of the joints and the masses of each body part are
|
rlm@466
|
996 determined in blender."
|
rlm@466
|
997 [#^Node creature]
|
rlm@466
|
998 (physical! creature)
|
rlm@466
|
999 (joints! creature))
|
rlm@469
|
1000 #+end_src
|
rlm@469
|
1001 #+end_listing
|
rlm@466
|
1002
|
rlm@469
|
1003 All of the code you have just seen amounts to only 130 lines, yet
|
rlm@469
|
1004 because it builds on top of Blender and jMonkeyEngine3, those few
|
rlm@469
|
1005 lines pack quite a punch!
|
rlm@466
|
1006
|
rlm@469
|
1007 The hand from figure \ref{blender-hand}, which was modeled after
|
rlm@469
|
1008 my own right hand, can now be given joints and simulated as a
|
rlm@469
|
1009 creature.
|
rlm@466
|
1010
|
rlm@469
|
1011 #+caption: With the ability to create physical creatures from blender,
|
rlm@517
|
1012 #+caption: =CORTEX= gets one step closer to becoming a full creature
|
rlm@469
|
1013 #+caption: simulation environment.
|
rlm@518
|
1014 #+name: physical-hand
|
rlm@469
|
1015 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 15cm
|
rlm@469
|
1016 [[./images/physical-hand.png]]
|
rlm@468
|
1017
|
rlm@511
|
1018 ** Sight reuses standard video game components...
|
rlm@436
|
1019
|
rlm@470
|
1020 Vision is one of the most important senses for humans, so I need to
|
rlm@470
|
1021 build a simulated sense of vision for my AI. I will do this with
|
rlm@470
|
1022 simulated eyes. Each eye can be independently moved and should see
|
rlm@470
|
1023 its own version of the world depending on where it is.
|
rlm@470
|
1024
|
rlm@470
|
1025 Making these simulated eyes a reality is simple because
|
rlm@470
|
1026 jMonkeyEngine already contains extensive support for multiple views
|
rlm@470
|
1027 of the same 3D simulated world. The reason jMonkeyEngine has this
|
rlm@470
|
1028 support is because the support is necessary to create games with
|
rlm@470
|
1029 split-screen views. Multiple views are also used to create
|
rlm@470
|
1030 efficient pseudo-reflections by rendering the scene from a certain
|
rlm@470
|
1031 perspective and then projecting it back onto a surface in the 3D
|
rlm@470
|
1032 world.
|
rlm@470
|
1033
|
rlm@470
|
1034 #+caption: jMonkeyEngine supports multiple views to enable
|
rlm@470
|
1035 #+caption: split-screen games, like GoldenEye, which was one of
|
rlm@470
|
1036 #+caption: the first games to use split-screen views.
|
rlm@518
|
1037 #+name: goldeneye
|
rlm@470
|
1038 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@470
|
1039 [[./images/goldeneye-4-player.png]]
|
rlm@470
|
1040
|
rlm@470
|
1041 *** A Brief Description of jMonkeyEngine's Rendering Pipeline
|
rlm@470
|
1042
|
rlm@470
|
1043 jMonkeyEngine allows you to create a =ViewPort=, which represents a
|
rlm@470
|
1044 view of the simulated world. You can create as many of these as you
|
rlm@470
|
1045 want. Every frame, the =RenderManager= iterates through each
|
rlm@470
|
1046 =ViewPort=, rendering the scene in the GPU. For each =ViewPort= there
|
rlm@470
|
1047 is a =FrameBuffer= which represents the rendered image in the GPU.
|
rlm@470
|
1048
|
rlm@470
|
1049 #+caption: =ViewPorts= are cameras in the world. During each frame,
|
rlm@470
|
1050 #+caption: the =RenderManager= records a snapshot of what each view
|
rlm@470
|
1051 #+caption: is currently seeing; these snapshots are =FrameBuffer= objects.
|
rlm@508
|
1052 #+name: rendermanagers
|
rlm@470
|
1053 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@508
|
1054 [[./images/diagram_rendermanager2.png]]
|
rlm@470
|
1055
|
rlm@470
|
1056 Each =ViewPort= can have any number of attached =SceneProcessor=
|
rlm@470
|
1057 objects, which are called every time a new frame is rendered. A
|
rlm@470
|
1058 =SceneProcessor= receives its =ViewPort's= =FrameBuffer= and can do
|
rlm@470
|
1059 whatever it wants to the data. Often this consists of invoking GPU
|
rlm@470
|
1060 specific operations on the rendered image. The =SceneProcessor= can
|
rlm@470
|
1061 also copy the GPU image data to RAM and process it with the CPU.
|
rlm@470
|
1062
|
rlm@470
|
1063 *** Appropriating Views for Vision
|
rlm@470
|
1064
|
rlm@470
|
1065 Each eye in the simulated creature needs its own =ViewPort= so
|
rlm@470
|
1066 that it can see the world from its own perspective. To this
|
rlm@470
|
1067 =ViewPort=, I add a =SceneProcessor= that feeds the visual data to
|
rlm@470
|
1068 any arbitrary continuation function for further processing. That
|
rlm@470
|
1069 continuation function may perform both CPU and GPU operations on
|
rlm@470
|
1070 the data. To make this easy for the continuation function, the
|
rlm@470
|
1071 =SceneProcessor= maintains appropriately sized buffers in RAM to
|
rlm@470
|
1072 hold the data. It does not do any copying from the GPU to the CPU
|
rlm@470
|
1073 itself because it is a slow operation.
|
rlm@470
|
1074
|
rlm@517
|
1075 #+caption: Function to make the rendered scene in jMonkeyEngine
|
rlm@470
|
1076 #+caption: available for further processing.
|
rlm@470
|
1077 #+name: pipeline-1
|
rlm@470
|
1078 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@470
|
1079 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@470
|
1080 (defn vision-pipeline
|
rlm@470
|
1081 "Create a SceneProcessor object which wraps a vision processing
|
rlm@470
|
1082 continuation function. The continuation is a function that takes
|
rlm@470
|
1083 [#^Renderer r #^FrameBuffer fb #^ByteBuffer b #^BufferedImage bi],
|
rlm@470
|
1084 each of which has already been appropriately sized."
|
rlm@470
|
1085 [continuation]
|
rlm@470
|
1086 (let [byte-buffer (atom nil)
|
rlm@470
|
1087 renderer (atom nil)
|
rlm@470
|
1088 image (atom nil)]
|
rlm@470
|
1089 (proxy [SceneProcessor] []
|
rlm@470
|
1090 (initialize
|
rlm@470
|
1091 [renderManager viewPort]
|
rlm@470
|
1092 (let [cam (.getCamera viewPort)
|
rlm@470
|
1093 width (.getWidth cam)
|
rlm@470
|
1094 height (.getHeight cam)]
|
rlm@470
|
1095 (reset! renderer (.getRenderer renderManager))
|
rlm@470
|
1096 (reset! byte-buffer
|
rlm@470
|
1097 (BufferUtils/createByteBuffer
|
rlm@470
|
1098 (* width height 4)))
|
rlm@470
|
1099 (reset! image (BufferedImage.
|
rlm@470
|
1100 width height
|
rlm@470
|
1101 BufferedImage/TYPE_4BYTE_ABGR))))
|
rlm@470
|
1102 (isInitialized [] (not (nil? @byte-buffer)))
|
rlm@470
|
1103 (reshape [_ _ _])
|
rlm@470
|
1104 (preFrame [_])
|
rlm@470
|
1105 (postQueue [_])
|
rlm@470
|
1106 (postFrame
|
rlm@470
|
1107 [#^FrameBuffer fb]
|
rlm@470
|
1108 (.clear @byte-buffer)
|
rlm@470
|
1109 (continuation @renderer fb @byte-buffer @image))
|
rlm@470
|
1110 (cleanup []))))
|
rlm@470
|
1111 #+end_src
|
rlm@470
|
1112 #+end_listing
|
rlm@470
|
1113
|
rlm@470
|
1114 The continuation function given to =vision-pipeline= above will be
|
rlm@470
|
1115 given a =Renderer= and three containers for image data. The
|
rlm@470
|
1116 =FrameBuffer= references the GPU image data, but the pixel data
|
rlm@470
|
1117 can not be used directly on the CPU. The =ByteBuffer= and
|
rlm@470
|
1118 =BufferedImage= are initially "empty" but are sized to hold the
|
rlm@470
|
1119 data in the =FrameBuffer=. I call transferring the GPU image data
|
rlm@470
|
1120 to the CPU structures "mixing" the image data.
|
rlm@470
|
1121
|
rlm@470
|
1122 *** Optical sensor arrays are described with images and referenced with metadata
|
rlm@470
|
1123
|
rlm@470
|
1124 The vision pipeline described above handles the flow of rendered
|
rlm@470
|
1125 images. Now, =CORTEX= needs simulated eyes to serve as the source
|
rlm@470
|
1126 of these images.
|
rlm@470
|
1127
|
rlm@470
|
1128 An eye is described in blender in the same way as a joint. They
|
rlm@470
|
1129 are zero dimensional empty objects with no geometry whose local
|
rlm@470
|
1130 coordinate system determines the orientation of the resulting eye.
|
rlm@470
|
1131 All eyes are children of a parent node named "eyes" just as all
|
rlm@470
|
1132 joints have a parent named "joints". An eye binds to the nearest
|
rlm@470
|
1133 physical object with =bind-sense=.
|
rlm@470
|
1134
|
rlm@470
|
1135 #+caption: Here, the camera is created based on metadata on the
|
rlm@470
|
1136 #+caption: eye-node and attached to the nearest physical object
|
rlm@470
|
1137 #+caption: with =bind-sense=
|
rlm@470
|
1138 #+name: add-eye
|
rlm@470
|
1139 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@545
|
1140 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@470
|
1141 (defn add-eye!
|
rlm@470
|
1142 "Create a Camera centered on the current position of 'eye which
|
rlm@470
|
1143 follows the closest physical node in 'creature. The camera will
|
rlm@470
|
1144 point in the X direction and use the Z vector as up as determined
|
rlm@470
|
1145 by the rotation of these vectors in blender coordinate space. Use
|
rlm@470
|
1146 XZY rotation for the node in blender."
|
rlm@470
|
1147 [#^Node creature #^Spatial eye]
|
rlm@470
|
1148 (let [target (closest-node creature eye)
|
rlm@470
|
1149 [cam-width cam-height]
|
rlm@470
|
1150 ;;[640 480] ;; graphics card on laptop doesn't support
|
rlm@517
|
1151 ;; arbitrary dimensions.
|
rlm@470
|
1152 (eye-dimensions eye)
|
rlm@470
|
1153 cam (Camera. cam-width cam-height)
|
rlm@470
|
1154 rot (.getWorldRotation eye)]
|
rlm@470
|
1155 (.setLocation cam (.getWorldTranslation eye))
|
rlm@470
|
1156 (.lookAtDirection
|
rlm@470
|
1157 cam ; this part is not a mistake and
|
rlm@470
|
1158 (.mult rot Vector3f/UNIT_X) ; is consistent with using Z in
|
rlm@470
|
1159 (.mult rot Vector3f/UNIT_Y)) ; blender as the UP vector.
|
rlm@470
|
1160 (.setFrustumPerspective
|
rlm@470
|
1161 cam (float 45)
|
rlm@470
|
1162 (float (/ (.getWidth cam) (.getHeight cam)))
|
rlm@470
|
1163 (float 1)
|
rlm@470
|
1164 (float 1000))
|
rlm@470
|
1165 (bind-sense target cam) cam))
|
rlm@545
|
1166 #+end_src
|
rlm@470
|
1167 #+end_listing
|
rlm@470
|
1168
|
rlm@470
|
1169 *** Simulated Retina
|
rlm@470
|
1170
|
rlm@470
|
1171 An eye is a surface (the retina) which contains many discrete
|
rlm@470
|
1172 sensors to detect light. These sensors can have different
|
rlm@470
|
1173 light-sensing properties. In humans, each discrete sensor is
|
rlm@470
|
1174 sensitive to red, blue, green, or gray. These different types of
|
rlm@470
|
1175 sensors can have different spatial distributions along the retina.
|
rlm@470
|
1176 In humans, there is a fovea in the center of the retina which has
|
rlm@470
|
1177 a very high density of color sensors, and a blind spot which has
|
rlm@470
|
1178 no sensors at all. Sensor density decreases in proportion to
|
rlm@470
|
1179 distance from the fovea.
|
rlm@470
|
1180
|
rlm@470
|
1181 I want to be able to model any retinal configuration, so my
|
rlm@470
|
1182 eye-nodes in blender contain metadata pointing to images that
|
rlm@470
|
1183 describe the precise position of the individual sensors using
|
rlm@470
|
1184 white pixels. The meta-data also describes the precise sensitivity
|
rlm@470
|
1185 to light that the sensors described in the image have. An eye can
|
rlm@470
|
1186 contain any number of these images. For example, the metadata for
|
rlm@470
|
1187 an eye might look like this:
|
rlm@470
|
1188
|
rlm@470
|
1189 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@470
|
1190 {0xFF0000 "Models/test-creature/retina-small.png"}
|
rlm@470
|
1191 #+end_src
|
rlm@470
|
1192
|
rlm@470
|
1193 #+caption: An example retinal profile image. White pixels are
|
rlm@470
|
1194 #+caption: photo-sensitive elements. The distribution of white
|
rlm@470
|
1195 #+caption: pixels is denser in the middle and falls off at the
|
rlm@470
|
1196 #+caption: edges and is inspired by the human retina.
|
rlm@470
|
1197 #+name: retina
|
rlm@510
|
1198 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 7cm
|
rlm@470
|
1199 [[./images/retina-small.png]]
|
rlm@470
|
1200
|
rlm@545
|
1201 Together, the number 0xFF0000 and the image above describe the
|
rlm@545
|
1202 placement of red-sensitive sensory elements.
|
rlm@470
|
1203
|
rlm@470
|
1204 Meta-data to very crudely approximate a human eye might be
|
rlm@470
|
1205 something like this:
|
rlm@470
|
1206
|
rlm@470
|
1207 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@470
|
1208 (let [retinal-profile "Models/test-creature/retina-small.png"]
|
rlm@470
|
1209 {0xFF0000 retinal-profile
|
rlm@470
|
1210 0x00FF00 retinal-profile
|
rlm@470
|
1211 0x0000FF retinal-profile
|
rlm@470
|
1212 0xFFFFFF retinal-profile})
|
rlm@470
|
1213 #+end_src
|
rlm@470
|
1214
|
rlm@470
|
1215 The numbers that serve as keys in the map determine a sensor's
|
rlm@470
|
1216 relative sensitivity to the channels red, green, and blue. These
|
rlm@470
|
1217 sensitivity values are packed into an integer in the order
|
rlm@470
|
1218 =|_|R|G|B|= in 8-bit fields. The RGB values of a pixel in the
|
rlm@470
|
1219 image are added together with these sensitivities as linear
|
rlm@470
|
1220 weights. Therefore, 0xFF0000 means sensitive to red only while
|
rlm@470
|
1221 0xFFFFFF means sensitive to all colors equally (gray).
|
rlm@470
|
1222
|
rlm@470
|
1223 #+caption: This is the core of vision in =CORTEX=. A given eye node
|
rlm@470
|
1224 #+caption: is converted into a function that returns visual
|
rlm@470
|
1225 #+caption: information from the simulation.
|
rlm@471
|
1226 #+name: vision-kernel
|
rlm@470
|
1227 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@508
|
1228 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@470
|
1229 (defn vision-kernel
|
rlm@470
|
1230 "Returns a list of functions, each of which will return a color
|
rlm@470
|
1231 channel's worth of visual information when called inside a running
|
rlm@470
|
1232 simulation."
|
rlm@470
|
1233 [#^Node creature #^Spatial eye & {skip :skip :or {skip 0}}]
|
rlm@470
|
1234 (let [retinal-map (retina-sensor-profile eye)
|
rlm@470
|
1235 camera (add-eye! creature eye)
|
rlm@470
|
1236 vision-image
|
rlm@470
|
1237 (atom
|
rlm@470
|
1238 (BufferedImage. (.getWidth camera)
|
rlm@470
|
1239 (.getHeight camera)
|
rlm@470
|
1240 BufferedImage/TYPE_BYTE_BINARY))
|
rlm@470
|
1241 register-eye!
|
rlm@470
|
1242 (runonce
|
rlm@470
|
1243 (fn [world]
|
rlm@470
|
1244 (add-camera!
|
rlm@470
|
1245 world camera
|
rlm@470
|
1246 (let [counter (atom 0)]
|
rlm@470
|
1247 (fn [r fb bb bi]
|
rlm@470
|
1248 (if (zero? (rem (swap! counter inc) (inc skip)))
|
rlm@470
|
1249 (reset! vision-image
|
rlm@470
|
1250 (BufferedImage! r fb bb bi))))))))]
|
rlm@470
|
1251 (vec
|
rlm@470
|
1252 (map
|
rlm@470
|
1253 (fn [[key image]]
|
rlm@470
|
1254 (let [whites (white-coordinates image)
|
rlm@470
|
1255 topology (vec (collapse whites))
|
rlm@470
|
1256 sensitivity (sensitivity-presets key key)]
|
rlm@470
|
1257 (attached-viewport.
|
rlm@470
|
1258 (fn [world]
|
rlm@470
|
1259 (register-eye! world)
|
rlm@470
|
1260 (vector
|
rlm@470
|
1261 topology
|
rlm@470
|
1262 (vec
|
rlm@470
|
1263 (for [[x y] whites]
|
rlm@470
|
1264 (pixel-sense
|
rlm@470
|
1265 sensitivity
|
rlm@470
|
1266 (.getRGB @vision-image x y))))))
|
rlm@470
|
1267 register-eye!)))
|
rlm@470
|
1268 retinal-map))))
|
rlm@508
|
1269 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@470
|
1270 #+end_listing
|
rlm@470
|
1271
|
rlm@470
|
1272 Note that since each of the functions generated by =vision-kernel=
|
rlm@470
|
1273 shares the same =register-eye!= function, the eye will be
|
rlm@470
|
1274 registered only once the first time any of the functions from the
|
rlm@470
|
1275 list returned by =vision-kernel= is called. Each of the functions
|
rlm@470
|
1276 returned by =vision-kernel= also allows access to the =Viewport=
|
rlm@470
|
1277 through which it receives images.
|
rlm@470
|
1278
|
rlm@470
|
1279 All the hard work has been done; all that remains is to apply
|
rlm@470
|
1280 =vision-kernel= to each eye in the creature and gather the results
|
rlm@470
|
1281 into one list of functions.
|
rlm@470
|
1282
|
rlm@470
|
1283
|
rlm@470
|
1284 #+caption: With =vision!=, =CORTEX= is already a fine simulation
|
rlm@470
|
1285 #+caption: environment for experimenting with different types of
|
rlm@470
|
1286 #+caption: eyes.
|
rlm@470
|
1287 #+name: vision!
|
rlm@470
|
1288 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@508
|
1289 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@470
|
1290 (defn vision!
|
rlm@470
|
1291 "Returns a list of functions, each of which returns visual sensory
|
rlm@470
|
1292 data when called inside a running simulation."
|
rlm@470
|
1293 [#^Node creature & {skip :skip :or {skip 0}}]
|
rlm@470
|
1294 (reduce
|
rlm@470
|
1295 concat
|
rlm@470
|
1296 (for [eye (eyes creature)]
|
rlm@470
|
1297 (vision-kernel creature eye))))
|
rlm@508
|
1298 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@470
|
1299 #+end_listing
|
rlm@470
|
1300
|
rlm@471
|
1301 #+caption: Simulated vision with a test creature and the
|
rlm@471
|
1302 #+caption: human-like eye approximation. Notice how each channel
|
rlm@471
|
1303 #+caption: of the eye responds differently to the differently
|
rlm@471
|
1304 #+caption: colored balls.
|
rlm@471
|
1305 #+name: worm-vision-test.
|
rlm@471
|
1306 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 13cm
|
rlm@471
|
1307 [[./images/worm-vision.png]]
|
rlm@470
|
1308
|
rlm@471
|
1309 The vision code is not much more complicated than the body code,
|
rlm@471
|
1310 and enables multiple further paths for simulated vision. For
|
rlm@471
|
1311 example, it is quite easy to create bifocal vision -- you just
|
rlm@471
|
1312 make two eyes next to each other in blender! It is also possible
|
rlm@471
|
1313 to encode vision transforms in the retinal files. For example, the
|
rlm@471
|
1314 human like retina file in figure \ref{retina} approximates a
|
rlm@471
|
1315 log-polar transform.
|
rlm@470
|
1316
|
rlm@471
|
1317 This vision code has already been absorbed by the jMonkeyEngine
|
rlm@471
|
1318 community and is now (in modified form) part of a system for
|
rlm@471
|
1319 capturing in-game video to a file.
|
rlm@470
|
1320
|
rlm@511
|
1321 ** ...but hearing must be built from scratch
|
rlm@514
|
1322
|
rlm@551
|
1323 At the end of this chapter I will have simulated ears that work the
|
rlm@551
|
1324 same way as the simulated eyes in the last chapter. I will be able to
|
rlm@472
|
1325 place any number of ear-nodes in a blender file, and they will bind to
|
rlm@472
|
1326 the closest physical object and follow it as it moves around. Each ear
|
rlm@472
|
1327 will provide access to the sound data it picks up between every frame.
|
rlm@472
|
1328
|
rlm@472
|
1329 Hearing is one of the more difficult senses to simulate, because there
|
rlm@472
|
1330 is less support for obtaining the actual sound data that is processed
|
rlm@472
|
1331 by jMonkeyEngine3. There is no "split-screen" support for rendering
|
rlm@472
|
1332 sound from different points of view, and there is no way to directly
|
rlm@472
|
1333 access the rendered sound data.
|
rlm@472
|
1334
|
rlm@472
|
1335 =CORTEX='s hearing is unique because it does not have any
|
rlm@472
|
1336 limitations compared to other simulation environments. As far as I
|
rlm@517
|
1337 know, there is no other system that supports multiple listeners,
|
rlm@551
|
1338 and the sound demo at the end of this chapter is the first time
|
rlm@472
|
1339 it's been done in a video game environment.
|
rlm@472
|
1340
|
rlm@472
|
1341 *** Brief Description of jMonkeyEngine's Sound System
|
rlm@472
|
1342
|
rlm@472
|
1343 jMonkeyEngine's sound system works as follows:
|
rlm@472
|
1344
|
rlm@472
|
1345 - jMonkeyEngine uses the =AppSettings= for the particular
|
rlm@472
|
1346 application to determine what sort of =AudioRenderer= should be
|
rlm@472
|
1347 used.
|
rlm@472
|
1348 - Although some support is provided for multiple AudioRendering
|
rlm@472
|
1349 backends, jMonkeyEngine at the time of this writing will either
|
rlm@472
|
1350 pick no =AudioRenderer= at all, or the =LwjglAudioRenderer=.
|
rlm@472
|
1351 - jMonkeyEngine tries to figure out what sort of system you're
|
rlm@472
|
1352 running and extracts the appropriate native libraries.
|
rlm@472
|
1353 - The =LwjglAudioRenderer= uses the [[http://lwjgl.org/][=LWJGL=]] (LightWeight Java Game
|
rlm@472
|
1354 Library) bindings to interface with a C library called [[http://kcat.strangesoft.net/openal.html][=OpenAL=]]
|
rlm@472
|
1355 - =OpenAL= renders the 3D sound and feeds the rendered sound
|
rlm@472
|
1356 directly to any of various sound output devices with which it
|
rlm@472
|
1357 knows how to communicate.
|
rlm@472
|
1358
|
rlm@472
|
1359 A consequence of this is that there's no way to access the actual
|
rlm@472
|
1360 sound data produced by =OpenAL=. Even worse, =OpenAL= only supports
|
rlm@472
|
1361 one /listener/ (it renders sound data from only one perspective),
|
rlm@472
|
1362 which normally isn't a problem for games, but becomes a problem
|
rlm@472
|
1363 when trying to make multiple AI creatures that can each hear the
|
rlm@472
|
1364 world from a different perspective.
|
rlm@472
|
1365
|
rlm@472
|
1366 To make many AI creatures in jMonkeyEngine that can each hear the
|
rlm@472
|
1367 world from their own perspective, or to make a single creature with
|
rlm@472
|
1368 many ears, it is necessary to go all the way back to =OpenAL= and
|
rlm@472
|
1369 implement support for simulated hearing there.
|
rlm@472
|
1370
|
rlm@472
|
1371 *** Extending =OpenAl=
|
rlm@472
|
1372
|
rlm@472
|
1373 Extending =OpenAL= to support multiple listeners requires 500
|
rlm@472
|
1374 lines of =C= code and is too hairy to mention here. Instead, I
|
rlm@472
|
1375 will show a small amount of extension code and go over the high
|
rlm@517
|
1376 level strategy. Full source is of course available with the
|
rlm@472
|
1377 =CORTEX= distribution if you're interested.
|
rlm@472
|
1378
|
rlm@472
|
1379 =OpenAL= goes to great lengths to support many different systems,
|
rlm@472
|
1380 all with different sound capabilities and interfaces. It
|
rlm@472
|
1381 accomplishes this difficult task by providing code for many
|
rlm@472
|
1382 different sound backends in pseudo-objects called /Devices/.
|
rlm@472
|
1383 There's a device for the Linux Open Sound System and the Advanced
|
rlm@472
|
1384 Linux Sound Architecture, there's one for Direct Sound on Windows,
|
rlm@472
|
1385 and there's even one for Solaris. =OpenAL= solves the problem of
|
rlm@472
|
1386 platform independence by providing all these Devices.
|
rlm@472
|
1387
|
rlm@472
|
1388 Wrapper libraries such as LWJGL are free to examine the system on
|
rlm@472
|
1389 which they are running and then select an appropriate device for
|
rlm@472
|
1390 that system.
|
rlm@472
|
1391
|
rlm@472
|
1392 There are also a few "special" devices that don't interface with
|
rlm@472
|
1393 any particular system. These include the Null Device, which
|
rlm@472
|
1394 doesn't do anything, and the Wave Device, which writes whatever
|
rlm@472
|
1395 sound it receives to a file, if everything has been set up
|
rlm@472
|
1396 correctly when configuring =OpenAL=.
|
rlm@472
|
1397
|
rlm@517
|
1398 Actual mixing (Doppler shift and distance.environment-based
|
rlm@472
|
1399 attenuation) of the sound data happens in the Devices, and they
|
rlm@472
|
1400 are the only point in the sound rendering process where this data
|
rlm@472
|
1401 is available.
|
rlm@472
|
1402
|
rlm@472
|
1403 Therefore, in order to support multiple listeners, and get the
|
rlm@472
|
1404 sound data in a form that the AIs can use, it is necessary to
|
rlm@472
|
1405 create a new Device which supports this feature.
|
rlm@472
|
1406
|
rlm@472
|
1407 Adding a device to OpenAL is rather tricky -- there are five
|
rlm@472
|
1408 separate files in the =OpenAL= source tree that must be modified
|
rlm@472
|
1409 to do so. I named my device the "Multiple Audio Send" Device, or
|
rlm@472
|
1410 =Send= Device for short, since it sends audio data back to the
|
rlm@472
|
1411 calling application like an Aux-Send cable on a mixing board.
|
rlm@472
|
1412
|
rlm@472
|
1413 The main idea behind the Send device is to take advantage of the
|
rlm@472
|
1414 fact that LWJGL only manages one /context/ when using OpenAL. A
|
rlm@472
|
1415 /context/ is like a container that holds samples and keeps track
|
rlm@472
|
1416 of where the listener is. In order to support multiple listeners,
|
rlm@472
|
1417 the Send device identifies the LWJGL context as the master
|
rlm@472
|
1418 context, and creates any number of slave contexts to represent
|
rlm@472
|
1419 additional listeners. Every time the device renders sound, it
|
rlm@472
|
1420 synchronizes every source from the master LWJGL context to the
|
rlm@472
|
1421 slave contexts. Then, it renders each context separately, using a
|
rlm@472
|
1422 different listener for each one. The rendered sound is made
|
rlm@472
|
1423 available via JNI to jMonkeyEngine.
|
rlm@472
|
1424
|
rlm@472
|
1425 Switching between contexts is not the normal operation of a
|
rlm@472
|
1426 Device, and one of the problems with doing so is that a Device
|
rlm@472
|
1427 normally keeps around a few pieces of state such as the
|
rlm@472
|
1428 =ClickRemoval= array above which will become corrupted if the
|
rlm@472
|
1429 contexts are not rendered in parallel. The solution is to create a
|
rlm@472
|
1430 copy of this normally global device state for each context, and
|
rlm@472
|
1431 copy it back and forth into and out of the actual device state
|
rlm@472
|
1432 whenever a context is rendered.
|
rlm@472
|
1433
|
rlm@472
|
1434 The core of the =Send= device is the =syncSources= function, which
|
rlm@472
|
1435 does the job of copying all relevant data from one context to
|
rlm@472
|
1436 another.
|
rlm@472
|
1437
|
rlm@472
|
1438 #+caption: Program for extending =OpenAL= to support multiple
|
rlm@472
|
1439 #+caption: listeners via context copying/switching.
|
rlm@472
|
1440 #+name: sync-openal-sources
|
rlm@509
|
1441 #+begin_listing c
|
rlm@509
|
1442 #+BEGIN_SRC c
|
rlm@472
|
1443 void syncSources(ALsource *masterSource, ALsource *slaveSource,
|
rlm@472
|
1444 ALCcontext *masterCtx, ALCcontext *slaveCtx){
|
rlm@472
|
1445 ALuint master = masterSource->source;
|
rlm@472
|
1446 ALuint slave = slaveSource->source;
|
rlm@472
|
1447 ALCcontext *current = alcGetCurrentContext();
|
rlm@472
|
1448
|
rlm@472
|
1449 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_PITCH);
|
rlm@472
|
1450 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_GAIN);
|
rlm@472
|
1451 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_MAX_DISTANCE);
|
rlm@472
|
1452 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_ROLLOFF_FACTOR);
|
rlm@472
|
1453 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_REFERENCE_DISTANCE);
|
rlm@472
|
1454 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_MIN_GAIN);
|
rlm@472
|
1455 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_MAX_GAIN);
|
rlm@472
|
1456 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_CONE_OUTER_GAIN);
|
rlm@472
|
1457 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_CONE_INNER_ANGLE);
|
rlm@472
|
1458 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_CONE_OUTER_ANGLE);
|
rlm@472
|
1459 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_SEC_OFFSET);
|
rlm@472
|
1460 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_SAMPLE_OFFSET);
|
rlm@472
|
1461 syncSourcef(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_BYTE_OFFSET);
|
rlm@472
|
1462
|
rlm@472
|
1463 syncSource3f(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_POSITION);
|
rlm@472
|
1464 syncSource3f(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_VELOCITY);
|
rlm@472
|
1465 syncSource3f(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_DIRECTION);
|
rlm@472
|
1466
|
rlm@472
|
1467 syncSourcei(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_SOURCE_RELATIVE);
|
rlm@472
|
1468 syncSourcei(master,slave,masterCtx,slaveCtx,AL_LOOPING);
|
rlm@472
|
1469
|
rlm@472
|
1470 alcMakeContextCurrent(masterCtx);
|
rlm@472
|
1471 ALint source_type;
|
rlm@472
|
1472 alGetSourcei(master, AL_SOURCE_TYPE, &source_type);
|
rlm@472
|
1473
|
rlm@472
|
1474 // Only static sources are currently synchronized!
|
rlm@472
|
1475 if (AL_STATIC == source_type){
|
rlm@472
|
1476 ALint master_buffer;
|
rlm@472
|
1477 ALint slave_buffer;
|
rlm@472
|
1478 alGetSourcei(master, AL_BUFFER, &master_buffer);
|
rlm@472
|
1479 alcMakeContextCurrent(slaveCtx);
|
rlm@472
|
1480 alGetSourcei(slave, AL_BUFFER, &slave_buffer);
|
rlm@472
|
1481 if (master_buffer != slave_buffer){
|
rlm@472
|
1482 alSourcei(slave, AL_BUFFER, master_buffer);
|
rlm@472
|
1483 }
|
rlm@472
|
1484 }
|
rlm@472
|
1485
|
rlm@472
|
1486 // Synchronize the state of the two sources.
|
rlm@472
|
1487 alcMakeContextCurrent(masterCtx);
|
rlm@472
|
1488 ALint masterState;
|
rlm@472
|
1489 ALint slaveState;
|
rlm@472
|
1490
|
rlm@472
|
1491 alGetSourcei(master, AL_SOURCE_STATE, &masterState);
|
rlm@472
|
1492 alcMakeContextCurrent(slaveCtx);
|
rlm@472
|
1493 alGetSourcei(slave, AL_SOURCE_STATE, &slaveState);
|
rlm@472
|
1494
|
rlm@472
|
1495 if (masterState != slaveState){
|
rlm@472
|
1496 switch (masterState){
|
rlm@472
|
1497 case AL_INITIAL : alSourceRewind(slave); break;
|
rlm@472
|
1498 case AL_PLAYING : alSourcePlay(slave); break;
|
rlm@472
|
1499 case AL_PAUSED : alSourcePause(slave); break;
|
rlm@472
|
1500 case AL_STOPPED : alSourceStop(slave); break;
|
rlm@472
|
1501 }
|
rlm@472
|
1502 }
|
rlm@472
|
1503 // Restore whatever context was previously active.
|
rlm@472
|
1504 alcMakeContextCurrent(current);
|
rlm@472
|
1505 }
|
rlm@508
|
1506 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@472
|
1507 #+end_listing
|
rlm@472
|
1508
|
rlm@472
|
1509 With this special context-switching device, and some ugly JNI
|
rlm@472
|
1510 bindings that are not worth mentioning, =CORTEX= gains the ability
|
rlm@472
|
1511 to access multiple sound streams from =OpenAL=.
|
rlm@472
|
1512
|
rlm@472
|
1513 #+caption: Program to create an ear from a blender empty node. The ear
|
rlm@472
|
1514 #+caption: follows around the nearest physical object and passes
|
rlm@472
|
1515 #+caption: all sensory data to a continuation function.
|
rlm@472
|
1516 #+name: add-ear
|
rlm@472
|
1517 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@508
|
1518 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@472
|
1519 (defn add-ear!
|
rlm@472
|
1520 "Create a Listener centered on the current position of 'ear
|
rlm@472
|
1521 which follows the closest physical node in 'creature and
|
rlm@472
|
1522 sends sound data to 'continuation."
|
rlm@472
|
1523 [#^Application world #^Node creature #^Spatial ear continuation]
|
rlm@472
|
1524 (let [target (closest-node creature ear)
|
rlm@472
|
1525 lis (Listener.)
|
rlm@472
|
1526 audio-renderer (.getAudioRenderer world)
|
rlm@472
|
1527 sp (hearing-pipeline continuation)]
|
rlm@472
|
1528 (.setLocation lis (.getWorldTranslation ear))
|
rlm@472
|
1529 (.setRotation lis (.getWorldRotation ear))
|
rlm@472
|
1530 (bind-sense target lis)
|
rlm@472
|
1531 (update-listener-velocity! target lis)
|
rlm@472
|
1532 (.addListener audio-renderer lis)
|
rlm@472
|
1533 (.registerSoundProcessor audio-renderer lis sp)))
|
rlm@508
|
1534 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@472
|
1535 #+end_listing
|
rlm@472
|
1536
|
rlm@472
|
1537 The =Send= device, unlike most of the other devices in =OpenAL=,
|
rlm@472
|
1538 does not render sound unless asked. This enables the system to
|
rlm@472
|
1539 slow down or speed up depending on the needs of the AIs who are
|
rlm@472
|
1540 using it to listen. If the device tried to render samples in
|
rlm@472
|
1541 real-time, a complicated AI whose mind takes 100 seconds of
|
rlm@472
|
1542 computer time to simulate 1 second of AI-time would miss almost
|
rlm@472
|
1543 all of the sound in its environment!
|
rlm@472
|
1544
|
rlm@472
|
1545 #+caption: Program to enable arbitrary hearing in =CORTEX=
|
rlm@472
|
1546 #+name: hearing
|
rlm@472
|
1547 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@508
|
1548 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@472
|
1549 (defn hearing-kernel
|
rlm@472
|
1550 "Returns a function which returns auditory sensory data when called
|
rlm@472
|
1551 inside a running simulation."
|
rlm@472
|
1552 [#^Node creature #^Spatial ear]
|
rlm@472
|
1553 (let [hearing-data (atom [])
|
rlm@472
|
1554 register-listener!
|
rlm@472
|
1555 (runonce
|
rlm@472
|
1556 (fn [#^Application world]
|
rlm@472
|
1557 (add-ear!
|
rlm@472
|
1558 world creature ear
|
rlm@472
|
1559 (comp #(reset! hearing-data %)
|
rlm@472
|
1560 byteBuffer->pulse-vector))))]
|
rlm@472
|
1561 (fn [#^Application world]
|
rlm@472
|
1562 (register-listener! world)
|
rlm@472
|
1563 (let [data @hearing-data
|
rlm@472
|
1564 topology
|
rlm@472
|
1565 (vec (map #(vector % 0) (range 0 (count data))))]
|
rlm@472
|
1566 [topology data]))))
|
rlm@472
|
1567
|
rlm@472
|
1568 (defn hearing!
|
rlm@472
|
1569 "Endow the creature in a particular world with the sense of
|
rlm@472
|
1570 hearing. Will return a sequence of functions, one for each ear,
|
rlm@472
|
1571 which when called will return the auditory data from that ear."
|
rlm@472
|
1572 [#^Node creature]
|
rlm@472
|
1573 (for [ear (ears creature)]
|
rlm@472
|
1574 (hearing-kernel creature ear)))
|
rlm@508
|
1575 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@472
|
1576 #+end_listing
|
rlm@472
|
1577
|
rlm@472
|
1578 Armed with these functions, =CORTEX= is able to test possibly the
|
rlm@472
|
1579 first ever instance of multiple listeners in a video game engine
|
rlm@472
|
1580 based simulation!
|
rlm@472
|
1581
|
rlm@472
|
1582 #+caption: Here a simple creature responds to sound by changing
|
rlm@472
|
1583 #+caption: its color from gray to green when the total volume
|
rlm@472
|
1584 #+caption: goes over a threshold.
|
rlm@472
|
1585 #+name: sound-test
|
rlm@472
|
1586 #+begin_listing java
|
rlm@508
|
1587 #+BEGIN_SRC java
|
rlm@472
|
1588 /**
|
rlm@472
|
1589 * Respond to sound! This is the brain of an AI entity that
|
rlm@472
|
1590 * hears its surroundings and reacts to them.
|
rlm@472
|
1591 */
|
rlm@472
|
1592 public void process(ByteBuffer audioSamples,
|
rlm@472
|
1593 int numSamples, AudioFormat format) {
|
rlm@472
|
1594 audioSamples.clear();
|
rlm@472
|
1595 byte[] data = new byte[numSamples];
|
rlm@472
|
1596 float[] out = new float[numSamples];
|
rlm@472
|
1597 audioSamples.get(data);
|
rlm@472
|
1598 FloatSampleTools.
|
rlm@472
|
1599 byte2floatInterleaved
|
rlm@472
|
1600 (data, 0, out, 0, numSamples/format.getFrameSize(), format);
|
rlm@472
|
1601
|
rlm@472
|
1602 float max = Float.NEGATIVE_INFINITY;
|
rlm@472
|
1603 for (float f : out){if (f > max) max = f;}
|
rlm@472
|
1604 audioSamples.clear();
|
rlm@472
|
1605
|
rlm@472
|
1606 if (max > 0.1){
|
rlm@472
|
1607 entity.getMaterial().setColor("Color", ColorRGBA.Green);
|
rlm@472
|
1608 }
|
rlm@472
|
1609 else {
|
rlm@472
|
1610 entity.getMaterial().setColor("Color", ColorRGBA.Gray);
|
rlm@472
|
1611 }
|
rlm@508
|
1612 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@472
|
1613 #+end_listing
|
rlm@472
|
1614
|
rlm@517
|
1615 #+caption: First ever simulation of multiple listeners in =CORTEX=.
|
rlm@472
|
1616 #+caption: Each cube is a creature which processes sound data with
|
rlm@472
|
1617 #+caption: the =process= function from listing \ref{sound-test}.
|
rlm@517
|
1618 #+caption: the ball is constantly emitting a pure tone of
|
rlm@472
|
1619 #+caption: constant volume. As it approaches the cubes, they each
|
rlm@472
|
1620 #+caption: change color in response to the sound.
|
rlm@472
|
1621 #+name: sound-cubes.
|
rlm@472
|
1622 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@509
|
1623 [[./images/java-hearing-test.png]]
|
rlm@472
|
1624
|
rlm@472
|
1625 This system of hearing has also been co-opted by the
|
rlm@472
|
1626 jMonkeyEngine3 community and is used to record audio for demo
|
rlm@472
|
1627 videos.
|
rlm@472
|
1628
|
rlm@511
|
1629 ** Hundreds of hair-like elements provide a sense of touch
|
rlm@436
|
1630
|
rlm@474
|
1631 Touch is critical to navigation and spatial reasoning and as such I
|
rlm@474
|
1632 need a simulated version of it to give to my AI creatures.
|
rlm@474
|
1633
|
rlm@474
|
1634 Human skin has a wide array of touch sensors, each of which
|
rlm@474
|
1635 specialize in detecting different vibrational modes and pressures.
|
rlm@474
|
1636 These sensors can integrate a vast expanse of skin (i.e. your
|
rlm@474
|
1637 entire palm), or a tiny patch of skin at the tip of your finger.
|
rlm@474
|
1638 The hairs of the skin help detect objects before they even come
|
rlm@474
|
1639 into contact with the skin proper.
|
rlm@474
|
1640
|
rlm@474
|
1641 However, touch in my simulated world can not exactly correspond to
|
rlm@474
|
1642 human touch because my creatures are made out of completely rigid
|
rlm@474
|
1643 segments that don't deform like human skin.
|
rlm@474
|
1644
|
rlm@474
|
1645 Instead of measuring deformation or vibration, I surround each
|
rlm@474
|
1646 rigid part with a plenitude of hair-like objects (/feelers/) which
|
rlm@474
|
1647 do not interact with the physical world. Physical objects can pass
|
rlm@474
|
1648 through them with no effect. The feelers are able to tell when
|
rlm@474
|
1649 other objects pass through them, and they constantly report how
|
rlm@474
|
1650 much of their extent is covered. So even though the creature's body
|
rlm@474
|
1651 parts do not deform, the feelers create a margin around those body
|
rlm@474
|
1652 parts which achieves a sense of touch which is a hybrid between a
|
rlm@474
|
1653 human's sense of deformation and sense from hairs.
|
rlm@474
|
1654
|
rlm@474
|
1655 Implementing touch in jMonkeyEngine follows a different technical
|
rlm@474
|
1656 route than vision and hearing. Those two senses piggybacked off
|
rlm@474
|
1657 jMonkeyEngine's 3D audio and video rendering subsystems. To
|
rlm@474
|
1658 simulate touch, I use jMonkeyEngine's physics system to execute
|
rlm@474
|
1659 many small collision detections, one for each feeler. The placement
|
rlm@474
|
1660 of the feelers is determined by a UV-mapped image which shows where
|
rlm@474
|
1661 each feeler should be on the 3D surface of the body.
|
rlm@474
|
1662
|
rlm@477
|
1663 *** Defining Touch Meta-Data in Blender
|
rlm@474
|
1664
|
rlm@474
|
1665 Each geometry can have a single UV map which describes the
|
rlm@474
|
1666 position of the feelers which will constitute its sense of touch.
|
rlm@474
|
1667 This image path is stored under the ``touch'' key. The image itself
|
rlm@474
|
1668 is black and white, with black meaning a feeler length of 0 (no
|
rlm@474
|
1669 feeler is present) and white meaning a feeler length of =scale=,
|
rlm@474
|
1670 which is a float stored under the key "scale".
|
rlm@474
|
1671
|
rlm@475
|
1672 #+caption: Touch does not use empty nodes, to store metadata,
|
rlm@475
|
1673 #+caption: because the metadata of each solid part of a
|
rlm@475
|
1674 #+caption: creature's body is sufficient.
|
rlm@475
|
1675 #+name: touch-meta-data
|
rlm@475
|
1676 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@477
|
1677 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@474
|
1678 (defn tactile-sensor-profile
|
rlm@474
|
1679 "Return the touch-sensor distribution image in BufferedImage format,
|
rlm@474
|
1680 or nil if it does not exist."
|
rlm@474
|
1681 [#^Geometry obj]
|
rlm@474
|
1682 (if-let [image-path (meta-data obj "touch")]
|
rlm@474
|
1683 (load-image image-path)))
|
rlm@474
|
1684
|
rlm@474
|
1685 (defn tactile-scale
|
rlm@474
|
1686 "Return the length of each feeler. Default scale is 0.01
|
rlm@474
|
1687 jMonkeyEngine units."
|
rlm@474
|
1688 [#^Geometry obj]
|
rlm@474
|
1689 (if-let [scale (meta-data obj "scale")]
|
rlm@474
|
1690 scale 0.1))
|
rlm@477
|
1691 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@475
|
1692 #+end_listing
|
rlm@474
|
1693
|
rlm@475
|
1694 Here is an example of a UV-map which specifies the position of
|
rlm@475
|
1695 touch sensors along the surface of the upper segment of a fingertip.
|
rlm@474
|
1696
|
rlm@475
|
1697 #+caption: This is the tactile-sensor-profile for the upper segment
|
rlm@475
|
1698 #+caption: of a fingertip. It defines regions of high touch sensitivity
|
rlm@475
|
1699 #+caption: (where there are many white pixels) and regions of low
|
rlm@475
|
1700 #+caption: sensitivity (where white pixels are sparse).
|
rlm@486
|
1701 #+name: fingertip-UV
|
rlm@477
|
1702 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 13cm
|
rlm@477
|
1703 [[./images/finger-UV.png]]
|
rlm@474
|
1704
|
rlm@477
|
1705 *** Implementation Summary
|
rlm@474
|
1706
|
rlm@474
|
1707 To simulate touch there are three conceptual steps. For each solid
|
rlm@474
|
1708 object in the creature, you first have to get UV image and scale
|
rlm@474
|
1709 parameter which define the position and length of the feelers.
|
rlm@474
|
1710 Then, you use the triangles which comprise the mesh and the UV
|
rlm@474
|
1711 data stored in the mesh to determine the world-space position and
|
rlm@474
|
1712 orientation of each feeler. Then once every frame, update these
|
rlm@474
|
1713 positions and orientations to match the current position and
|
rlm@474
|
1714 orientation of the object, and use physics collision detection to
|
rlm@474
|
1715 gather tactile data.
|
rlm@474
|
1716
|
rlm@474
|
1717 Extracting the meta-data has already been described. The third
|
rlm@474
|
1718 step, physics collision detection, is handled in =touch-kernel=.
|
rlm@474
|
1719 Translating the positions and orientations of the feelers from the
|
rlm@474
|
1720 UV-map to world-space is itself a three-step process.
|
rlm@474
|
1721
|
rlm@475
|
1722 - Find the triangles which make up the mesh in pixel-space and in
|
rlm@505
|
1723 world-space. \\(=triangles=, =pixel-triangles=).
|
rlm@474
|
1724
|
rlm@475
|
1725 - Find the coordinates of each feeler in world-space. These are
|
rlm@475
|
1726 the origins of the feelers. (=feeler-origins=).
|
rlm@474
|
1727
|
rlm@475
|
1728 - Calculate the normals of the triangles in world space, and add
|
rlm@475
|
1729 them to each of the origins of the feelers. These are the
|
rlm@475
|
1730 normalized coordinates of the tips of the feelers.
|
rlm@475
|
1731 (=feeler-tips=).
|
rlm@474
|
1732
|
rlm@477
|
1733 *** Triangle Math
|
rlm@474
|
1734
|
rlm@475
|
1735 The rigid objects which make up a creature have an underlying
|
rlm@475
|
1736 =Geometry=, which is a =Mesh= plus a =Material= and other
|
rlm@475
|
1737 important data involved with displaying the object.
|
rlm@475
|
1738
|
rlm@475
|
1739 A =Mesh= is composed of =Triangles=, and each =Triangle= has three
|
rlm@475
|
1740 vertices which have coordinates in world space and UV space.
|
rlm@475
|
1741
|
rlm@475
|
1742 Here, =triangles= gets all the world-space triangles which
|
rlm@475
|
1743 comprise a mesh, while =pixel-triangles= gets those same triangles
|
rlm@475
|
1744 expressed in pixel coordinates (which are UV coordinates scaled to
|
rlm@475
|
1745 fit the height and width of the UV image).
|
rlm@474
|
1746
|
rlm@475
|
1747 #+caption: Programs to extract triangles from a geometry and get
|
rlm@517
|
1748 #+caption: their vertices in both world and UV-coordinates.
|
rlm@475
|
1749 #+name: get-triangles
|
rlm@475
|
1750 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@477
|
1751 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@474
|
1752 (defn triangle
|
rlm@474
|
1753 "Get the triangle specified by triangle-index from the mesh."
|
rlm@474
|
1754 [#^Geometry geo triangle-index]
|
rlm@474
|
1755 (triangle-seq
|
rlm@474
|
1756 (let [scratch (Triangle.)]
|
rlm@474
|
1757 (.getTriangle (.getMesh geo) triangle-index scratch) scratch)))
|
rlm@474
|
1758
|
rlm@474
|
1759 (defn triangles
|
rlm@474
|
1760 "Return a sequence of all the Triangles which comprise a given
|
rlm@474
|
1761 Geometry."
|
rlm@474
|
1762 [#^Geometry geo]
|
rlm@474
|
1763 (map (partial triangle geo) (range (.getTriangleCount (.getMesh geo)))))
|
rlm@474
|
1764
|
rlm@474
|
1765 (defn triangle-vertex-indices
|
rlm@474
|
1766 "Get the triangle vertex indices of a given triangle from a given
|
rlm@474
|
1767 mesh."
|
rlm@474
|
1768 [#^Mesh mesh triangle-index]
|
rlm@474
|
1769 (let [indices (int-array 3)]
|
rlm@474
|
1770 (.getTriangle mesh triangle-index indices)
|
rlm@474
|
1771 (vec indices)))
|
rlm@474
|
1772
|
rlm@475
|
1773 (defn vertex-UV-coord
|
rlm@474
|
1774 "Get the UV-coordinates of the vertex named by vertex-index"
|
rlm@474
|
1775 [#^Mesh mesh vertex-index]
|
rlm@474
|
1776 (let [UV-buffer
|
rlm@474
|
1777 (.getData
|
rlm@474
|
1778 (.getBuffer
|
rlm@474
|
1779 mesh
|
rlm@474
|
1780 VertexBuffer$Type/TexCoord))]
|
rlm@474
|
1781 [(.get UV-buffer (* vertex-index 2))
|
rlm@474
|
1782 (.get UV-buffer (+ 1 (* vertex-index 2)))]))
|
rlm@474
|
1783
|
rlm@474
|
1784 (defn pixel-triangle [#^Geometry geo image index]
|
rlm@474
|
1785 (let [mesh (.getMesh geo)
|
rlm@474
|
1786 width (.getWidth image)
|
rlm@474
|
1787 height (.getHeight image)]
|
rlm@474
|
1788 (vec (map (fn [[u v]] (vector (* width u) (* height v)))
|
rlm@474
|
1789 (map (partial vertex-UV-coord mesh)
|
rlm@474
|
1790 (triangle-vertex-indices mesh index))))))
|
rlm@474
|
1791
|
rlm@474
|
1792 (defn pixel-triangles
|
rlm@474
|
1793 "The pixel-space triangles of the Geometry, in the same order as
|
rlm@474
|
1794 (triangles geo)"
|
rlm@474
|
1795 [#^Geometry geo image]
|
rlm@474
|
1796 (let [height (.getHeight image)
|
rlm@474
|
1797 width (.getWidth image)]
|
rlm@474
|
1798 (map (partial pixel-triangle geo image)
|
rlm@474
|
1799 (range (.getTriangleCount (.getMesh geo))))))
|
rlm@477
|
1800 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@475
|
1801 #+end_listing
|
rlm@475
|
1802
|
rlm@474
|
1803 *** The Affine Transform from one Triangle to Another
|
rlm@474
|
1804
|
rlm@475
|
1805 =pixel-triangles= gives us the mesh triangles expressed in pixel
|
rlm@475
|
1806 coordinates and =triangles= gives us the mesh triangles expressed
|
rlm@475
|
1807 in world coordinates. The tactile-sensor-profile gives the
|
rlm@475
|
1808 position of each feeler in pixel-space. In order to convert
|
rlm@475
|
1809 pixel-space coordinates into world-space coordinates we need
|
rlm@475
|
1810 something that takes coordinates on the surface of one triangle
|
rlm@475
|
1811 and gives the corresponding coordinates on the surface of another
|
rlm@475
|
1812 triangle.
|
rlm@475
|
1813
|
rlm@475
|
1814 Triangles are [[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AffineTransformation.html ][affine]], which means any triangle can be transformed
|
rlm@475
|
1815 into any other by a combination of translation, scaling, and
|
rlm@475
|
1816 rotation. The affine transformation from one triangle to another
|
rlm@475
|
1817 is readily computable if the triangle is expressed in terms of a
|
rlm@475
|
1818 $4x4$ matrix.
|
rlm@476
|
1819
|
rlm@476
|
1820 #+BEGIN_LaTeX
|
rlm@476
|
1821 $$
|
rlm@475
|
1822 \begin{bmatrix}
|
rlm@475
|
1823 x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & n_x \\
|
rlm@475
|
1824 y_1 & y_2 & y_3 & n_y \\
|
rlm@475
|
1825 z_1 & z_2 & z_3 & n_z \\
|
rlm@475
|
1826 1 & 1 & 1 & 1
|
rlm@475
|
1827 \end{bmatrix}
|
rlm@476
|
1828 $$
|
rlm@476
|
1829 #+END_LaTeX
|
rlm@475
|
1830
|
rlm@475
|
1831 Here, the first three columns of the matrix are the vertices of
|
rlm@475
|
1832 the triangle. The last column is the right-handed unit normal of
|
rlm@475
|
1833 the triangle.
|
rlm@475
|
1834
|
rlm@476
|
1835 With two triangles $T_{1}$ and $T_{2}$ each expressed as a
|
rlm@476
|
1836 matrix like above, the affine transform from $T_{1}$ to $T_{2}$
|
rlm@476
|
1837 is $T_{2}T_{1}^{-1}$.
|
rlm@475
|
1838
|
rlm@475
|
1839 The clojure code below recapitulates the formulas above, using
|
rlm@475
|
1840 jMonkeyEngine's =Matrix4f= objects, which can describe any affine
|
rlm@475
|
1841 transformation.
|
rlm@474
|
1842
|
rlm@517
|
1843 #+caption: Program to interpret triangles as affine transforms.
|
rlm@475
|
1844 #+name: triangle-affine
|
rlm@475
|
1845 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@475
|
1846 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@474
|
1847 (defn triangle->matrix4f
|
rlm@474
|
1848 "Converts the triangle into a 4x4 matrix: The first three columns
|
rlm@474
|
1849 contain the vertices of the triangle; the last contains the unit
|
rlm@474
|
1850 normal of the triangle. The bottom row is filled with 1s."
|
rlm@474
|
1851 [#^Triangle t]
|
rlm@474
|
1852 (let [mat (Matrix4f.)
|
rlm@474
|
1853 [vert-1 vert-2 vert-3]
|
rlm@474
|
1854 (mapv #(.get t %) (range 3))
|
rlm@474
|
1855 unit-normal (do (.calculateNormal t)(.getNormal t))
|
rlm@474
|
1856 vertices [vert-1 vert-2 vert-3 unit-normal]]
|
rlm@474
|
1857 (dorun
|
rlm@474
|
1858 (for [row (range 4) col (range 3)]
|
rlm@474
|
1859 (do
|
rlm@474
|
1860 (.set mat col row (.get (vertices row) col))
|
rlm@474
|
1861 (.set mat 3 row 1)))) mat))
|
rlm@474
|
1862
|
rlm@474
|
1863 (defn triangles->affine-transform
|
rlm@474
|
1864 "Returns the affine transformation that converts each vertex in the
|
rlm@474
|
1865 first triangle into the corresponding vertex in the second
|
rlm@474
|
1866 triangle."
|
rlm@474
|
1867 [#^Triangle tri-1 #^Triangle tri-2]
|
rlm@474
|
1868 (.mult
|
rlm@474
|
1869 (triangle->matrix4f tri-2)
|
rlm@474
|
1870 (.invert (triangle->matrix4f tri-1))))
|
rlm@475
|
1871 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@475
|
1872 #+end_listing
|
rlm@474
|
1873
|
rlm@477
|
1874 *** Triangle Boundaries
|
rlm@474
|
1875
|
rlm@474
|
1876 For efficiency's sake I will divide the tactile-profile image into
|
rlm@474
|
1877 small squares which inscribe each pixel-triangle, then extract the
|
rlm@474
|
1878 points which lie inside the triangle and map them to 3D-space using
|
rlm@474
|
1879 =triangle-transform= above. To do this I need a function,
|
rlm@474
|
1880 =convex-bounds= which finds the smallest box which inscribes a 2D
|
rlm@474
|
1881 triangle.
|
rlm@474
|
1882
|
rlm@474
|
1883 =inside-triangle?= determines whether a point is inside a triangle
|
rlm@474
|
1884 in 2D pixel-space.
|
rlm@474
|
1885
|
rlm@517
|
1886 #+caption: Program to efficiently determine point inclusion
|
rlm@475
|
1887 #+caption: in a triangle.
|
rlm@475
|
1888 #+name: in-triangle
|
rlm@475
|
1889 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@475
|
1890 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@474
|
1891 (defn convex-bounds
|
rlm@474
|
1892 "Returns the smallest square containing the given vertices, as a
|
rlm@474
|
1893 vector of integers [left top width height]."
|
rlm@474
|
1894 [verts]
|
rlm@474
|
1895 (let [xs (map first verts)
|
rlm@474
|
1896 ys (map second verts)
|
rlm@474
|
1897 x0 (Math/floor (apply min xs))
|
rlm@474
|
1898 y0 (Math/floor (apply min ys))
|
rlm@474
|
1899 x1 (Math/ceil (apply max xs))
|
rlm@474
|
1900 y1 (Math/ceil (apply max ys))]
|
rlm@474
|
1901 [x0 y0 (- x1 x0) (- y1 y0)]))
|
rlm@474
|
1902
|
rlm@474
|
1903 (defn same-side?
|
rlm@474
|
1904 "Given the points p1 and p2 and the reference point ref, is point p
|
rlm@474
|
1905 on the same side of the line that goes through p1 and p2 as ref is?"
|
rlm@474
|
1906 [p1 p2 ref p]
|
rlm@474
|
1907 (<=
|
rlm@474
|
1908 0
|
rlm@474
|
1909 (.dot
|
rlm@474
|
1910 (.cross (.subtract p2 p1) (.subtract p p1))
|
rlm@474
|
1911 (.cross (.subtract p2 p1) (.subtract ref p1)))))
|
rlm@474
|
1912
|
rlm@474
|
1913 (defn inside-triangle?
|
rlm@474
|
1914 "Is the point inside the triangle?"
|
rlm@474
|
1915 {:author "Dylan Holmes"}
|
rlm@474
|
1916 [#^Triangle tri #^Vector3f p]
|
rlm@474
|
1917 (let [[vert-1 vert-2 vert-3] [(.get1 tri) (.get2 tri) (.get3 tri)]]
|
rlm@474
|
1918 (and
|
rlm@474
|
1919 (same-side? vert-1 vert-2 vert-3 p)
|
rlm@474
|
1920 (same-side? vert-2 vert-3 vert-1 p)
|
rlm@474
|
1921 (same-side? vert-3 vert-1 vert-2 p))))
|
rlm@475
|
1922 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@475
|
1923 #+end_listing
|
rlm@474
|
1924
|
rlm@477
|
1925 *** Feeler Coordinates
|
rlm@474
|
1926
|
rlm@475
|
1927 The triangle-related functions above make short work of
|
rlm@475
|
1928 calculating the positions and orientations of each feeler in
|
rlm@475
|
1929 world-space.
|
rlm@474
|
1930
|
rlm@475
|
1931 #+caption: Program to get the coordinates of ``feelers '' in
|
rlm@475
|
1932 #+caption: both world and UV-coordinates.
|
rlm@475
|
1933 #+name: feeler-coordinates
|
rlm@475
|
1934 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@475
|
1935 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@474
|
1936 (defn feeler-pixel-coords
|
rlm@474
|
1937 "Returns the coordinates of the feelers in pixel space in lists, one
|
rlm@474
|
1938 list for each triangle, ordered in the same way as (triangles) and
|
rlm@474
|
1939 (pixel-triangles)."
|
rlm@474
|
1940 [#^Geometry geo image]
|
rlm@474
|
1941 (map
|
rlm@474
|
1942 (fn [pixel-triangle]
|
rlm@474
|
1943 (filter
|
rlm@474
|
1944 (fn [coord]
|
rlm@474
|
1945 (inside-triangle? (->triangle pixel-triangle)
|
rlm@474
|
1946 (->vector3f coord)))
|
rlm@474
|
1947 (white-coordinates image (convex-bounds pixel-triangle))))
|
rlm@474
|
1948 (pixel-triangles geo image)))
|
rlm@474
|
1949
|
rlm@474
|
1950 (defn feeler-world-coords
|
rlm@474
|
1951 "Returns the coordinates of the feelers in world space in lists, one
|
rlm@474
|
1952 list for each triangle, ordered in the same way as (triangles) and
|
rlm@474
|
1953 (pixel-triangles)."
|
rlm@474
|
1954 [#^Geometry geo image]
|
rlm@474
|
1955 (let [transforms
|
rlm@474
|
1956 (map #(triangles->affine-transform
|
rlm@474
|
1957 (->triangle %1) (->triangle %2))
|
rlm@474
|
1958 (pixel-triangles geo image)
|
rlm@474
|
1959 (triangles geo))]
|
rlm@474
|
1960 (map (fn [transform coords]
|
rlm@474
|
1961 (map #(.mult transform (->vector3f %)) coords))
|
rlm@474
|
1962 transforms (feeler-pixel-coords geo image))))
|
rlm@475
|
1963 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@475
|
1964 #+end_listing
|
rlm@474
|
1965
|
rlm@475
|
1966 #+caption: Program to get the position of the base and tip of
|
rlm@475
|
1967 #+caption: each ``feeler''
|
rlm@475
|
1968 #+name: feeler-tips
|
rlm@475
|
1969 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@475
|
1970 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@474
|
1971 (defn feeler-origins
|
rlm@474
|
1972 "The world space coordinates of the root of each feeler."
|
rlm@474
|
1973 [#^Geometry geo image]
|
rlm@474
|
1974 (reduce concat (feeler-world-coords geo image)))
|
rlm@474
|
1975
|
rlm@474
|
1976 (defn feeler-tips
|
rlm@474
|
1977 "The world space coordinates of the tip of each feeler."
|
rlm@474
|
1978 [#^Geometry geo image]
|
rlm@474
|
1979 (let [world-coords (feeler-world-coords geo image)
|
rlm@474
|
1980 normals
|
rlm@474
|
1981 (map
|
rlm@474
|
1982 (fn [triangle]
|
rlm@474
|
1983 (.calculateNormal triangle)
|
rlm@474
|
1984 (.clone (.getNormal triangle)))
|
rlm@474
|
1985 (map ->triangle (triangles geo)))]
|
rlm@474
|
1986
|
rlm@474
|
1987 (mapcat (fn [origins normal]
|
rlm@474
|
1988 (map #(.add % normal) origins))
|
rlm@474
|
1989 world-coords normals)))
|
rlm@474
|
1990
|
rlm@474
|
1991 (defn touch-topology
|
rlm@474
|
1992 [#^Geometry geo image]
|
rlm@474
|
1993 (collapse (reduce concat (feeler-pixel-coords geo image))))
|
rlm@475
|
1994 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@475
|
1995 #+end_listing
|
rlm@474
|
1996
|
rlm@477
|
1997 *** Simulated Touch
|
rlm@474
|
1998
|
rlm@475
|
1999 Now that the functions to construct feelers are complete,
|
rlm@475
|
2000 =touch-kernel= generates functions to be called from within a
|
rlm@475
|
2001 simulation that perform the necessary physics collisions to
|
rlm@475
|
2002 collect tactile data, and =touch!= recursively applies it to every
|
rlm@475
|
2003 node in the creature.
|
rlm@474
|
2004
|
rlm@475
|
2005 #+caption: Efficient program to transform a ray from
|
rlm@475
|
2006 #+caption: one position to another.
|
rlm@475
|
2007 #+name: set-ray
|
rlm@475
|
2008 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@475
|
2009 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@474
|
2010 (defn set-ray [#^Ray ray #^Matrix4f transform
|
rlm@474
|
2011 #^Vector3f origin #^Vector3f tip]
|
rlm@474
|
2012 ;; Doing everything locally reduces garbage collection by enough to
|
rlm@474
|
2013 ;; be worth it.
|
rlm@474
|
2014 (.mult transform origin (.getOrigin ray))
|
rlm@474
|
2015 (.mult transform tip (.getDirection ray))
|
rlm@474
|
2016 (.subtractLocal (.getDirection ray) (.getOrigin ray))
|
rlm@474
|
2017 (.normalizeLocal (.getDirection ray)))
|
rlm@475
|
2018 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@475
|
2019 #+end_listing
|
rlm@474
|
2020
|
rlm@475
|
2021 #+caption: This is the core of touch in =CORTEX= each feeler
|
rlm@475
|
2022 #+caption: follows the object it is bound to, reporting any
|
rlm@475
|
2023 #+caption: collisions that may happen.
|
rlm@475
|
2024 #+name: touch-kernel
|
rlm@475
|
2025 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@475
|
2026 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@474
|
2027 (defn touch-kernel
|
rlm@474
|
2028 "Constructs a function which will return tactile sensory data from
|
rlm@474
|
2029 'geo when called from inside a running simulation"
|
rlm@474
|
2030 [#^Geometry geo]
|
rlm@474
|
2031 (if-let
|
rlm@474
|
2032 [profile (tactile-sensor-profile geo)]
|
rlm@474
|
2033 (let [ray-reference-origins (feeler-origins geo profile)
|
rlm@474
|
2034 ray-reference-tips (feeler-tips geo profile)
|
rlm@474
|
2035 ray-length (tactile-scale geo)
|
rlm@474
|
2036 current-rays (map (fn [_] (Ray.)) ray-reference-origins)
|
rlm@474
|
2037 topology (touch-topology geo profile)
|
rlm@474
|
2038 correction (float (* ray-length -0.2))]
|
rlm@474
|
2039 ;; slight tolerance for very close collisions.
|
rlm@474
|
2040 (dorun
|
rlm@474
|
2041 (map (fn [origin tip]
|
rlm@474
|
2042 (.addLocal origin (.mult (.subtract tip origin)
|
rlm@474
|
2043 correction)))
|
rlm@474
|
2044 ray-reference-origins ray-reference-tips))
|
rlm@474
|
2045 (dorun (map #(.setLimit % ray-length) current-rays))
|
rlm@474
|
2046 (fn [node]
|
rlm@474
|
2047 (let [transform (.getWorldMatrix geo)]
|
rlm@474
|
2048 (dorun
|
rlm@474
|
2049 (map (fn [ray ref-origin ref-tip]
|
rlm@474
|
2050 (set-ray ray transform ref-origin ref-tip))
|
rlm@474
|
2051 current-rays ray-reference-origins
|
rlm@474
|
2052 ray-reference-tips))
|
rlm@474
|
2053 (vector
|
rlm@474
|
2054 topology
|
rlm@474
|
2055 (vec
|
rlm@474
|
2056 (for [ray current-rays]
|
rlm@474
|
2057 (do
|
rlm@474
|
2058 (let [results (CollisionResults.)]
|
rlm@474
|
2059 (.collideWith node ray results)
|
rlm@474
|
2060 (let [touch-objects
|
rlm@474
|
2061 (filter #(not (= geo (.getGeometry %)))
|
rlm@474
|
2062 results)
|
rlm@474
|
2063 limit (.getLimit ray)]
|
rlm@474
|
2064 [(if (empty? touch-objects)
|
rlm@474
|
2065 limit
|
rlm@474
|
2066 (let [response
|
rlm@474
|
2067 (apply min (map #(.getDistance %)
|
rlm@474
|
2068 touch-objects))]
|
rlm@474
|
2069 (FastMath/clamp
|
rlm@474
|
2070 (float
|
rlm@474
|
2071 (if (> response limit) (float 0.0)
|
rlm@474
|
2072 (+ response correction)))
|
rlm@474
|
2073 (float 0.0)
|
rlm@474
|
2074 limit)))
|
rlm@474
|
2075 limit])))))))))))
|
rlm@475
|
2076 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@475
|
2077 #+end_listing
|
rlm@474
|
2078
|
rlm@475
|
2079 Armed with the =touch!= function, =CORTEX= becomes capable of
|
rlm@475
|
2080 giving creatures a sense of touch. A simple test is to create a
|
rlm@517
|
2081 cube that is outfitted with a uniform distribution of touch
|
rlm@475
|
2082 sensors. It can feel the ground and any balls that it touches.
|
rlm@475
|
2083
|
rlm@475
|
2084 #+caption: =CORTEX= interface for creating touch in a simulated
|
rlm@475
|
2085 #+caption: creature.
|
rlm@475
|
2086 #+name: touch
|
rlm@475
|
2087 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@475
|
2088 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@474
|
2089 (defn touch!
|
rlm@474
|
2090 "Endow the creature with the sense of touch. Returns a sequence of
|
rlm@474
|
2091 functions, one for each body part with a tactile-sensor-profile,
|
rlm@474
|
2092 each of which when called returns sensory data for that body part."
|
rlm@474
|
2093 [#^Node creature]
|
rlm@474
|
2094 (filter
|
rlm@474
|
2095 (comp not nil?)
|
rlm@474
|
2096 (map touch-kernel
|
rlm@474
|
2097 (filter #(isa? (class %) Geometry)
|
rlm@474
|
2098 (node-seq creature)))))
|
rlm@475
|
2099 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@475
|
2100 #+end_listing
|
rlm@475
|
2101
|
rlm@475
|
2102 The tactile-sensor-profile image for the touch cube is a simple
|
rlm@517
|
2103 cross with a uniform distribution of touch sensors:
|
rlm@474
|
2104
|
rlm@475
|
2105 #+caption: The touch profile for the touch-cube. Each pure white
|
rlm@475
|
2106 #+caption: pixel defines a touch sensitive feeler.
|
rlm@475
|
2107 #+name: touch-cube-uv-map
|
rlm@495
|
2108 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 7cm
|
rlm@475
|
2109 [[./images/touch-profile.png]]
|
rlm@474
|
2110
|
rlm@517
|
2111 #+caption: The touch cube reacts to cannonballs. The black, red,
|
rlm@475
|
2112 #+caption: and white cross on the right is a visual display of
|
rlm@475
|
2113 #+caption: the creature's touch. White means that it is feeling
|
rlm@475
|
2114 #+caption: something strongly, black is not feeling anything,
|
rlm@475
|
2115 #+caption: and gray is in-between. The cube can feel both the
|
rlm@475
|
2116 #+caption: floor and the ball. Notice that when the ball causes
|
rlm@475
|
2117 #+caption: the cube to tip, that the bottom face can still feel
|
rlm@475
|
2118 #+caption: part of the ground.
|
rlm@518
|
2119 #+name: touch-cube-uv-map-2
|
rlm@475
|
2120 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 15cm
|
rlm@475
|
2121 [[./images/touch-cube.png]]
|
rlm@474
|
2122
|
rlm@511
|
2123 ** Proprioception provides knowledge of your own body's position
|
rlm@436
|
2124
|
rlm@479
|
2125 Close your eyes, and touch your nose with your right index finger.
|
rlm@479
|
2126 How did you do it? You could not see your hand, and neither your
|
rlm@479
|
2127 hand nor your nose could use the sense of touch to guide the path
|
rlm@479
|
2128 of your hand. There are no sound cues, and Taste and Smell
|
rlm@479
|
2129 certainly don't provide any help. You know where your hand is
|
rlm@479
|
2130 without your other senses because of Proprioception.
|
rlm@479
|
2131
|
rlm@479
|
2132 Humans can sometimes loose this sense through viral infections or
|
rlm@479
|
2133 damage to the spinal cord or brain, and when they do, they loose
|
rlm@479
|
2134 the ability to control their own bodies without looking directly at
|
rlm@479
|
2135 the parts they want to move. In [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Mistook_His_Wife_for_a_Hat][The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a
|
rlm@518
|
2136 Hat]] (\cite{man-wife-hat}), a woman named Christina looses this
|
rlm@518
|
2137 sense and has to learn how to move by carefully watching her arms
|
rlm@518
|
2138 and legs. She describes proprioception as the "eyes of the body,
|
rlm@518
|
2139 the way the body sees itself".
|
rlm@479
|
2140
|
rlm@479
|
2141 Proprioception in humans is mediated by [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Articular_capsule][joint capsules]], [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_spindle][muscle
|
rlm@479
|
2142 spindles]], and the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golgi_tendon_organ][Golgi tendon organs]]. These measure the relative
|
rlm@479
|
2143 positions of each body part by monitoring muscle strain and length.
|
rlm@479
|
2144
|
rlm@479
|
2145 It's clear that this is a vital sense for fluid, graceful movement.
|
rlm@479
|
2146 It's also particularly easy to implement in jMonkeyEngine.
|
rlm@479
|
2147
|
rlm@479
|
2148 My simulated proprioception calculates the relative angles of each
|
rlm@479
|
2149 joint from the rest position defined in the blender file. This
|
rlm@479
|
2150 simulates the muscle-spindles and joint capsules. I will deal with
|
rlm@479
|
2151 Golgi tendon organs, which calculate muscle strain, in the next
|
rlm@551
|
2152 chapter.
|
rlm@479
|
2153
|
rlm@479
|
2154 *** Helper functions
|
rlm@479
|
2155
|
rlm@479
|
2156 =absolute-angle= calculates the angle between two vectors,
|
rlm@479
|
2157 relative to a third axis vector. This angle is the number of
|
rlm@479
|
2158 radians you have to move counterclockwise around the axis vector
|
rlm@479
|
2159 to get from the first to the second vector. It is not commutative
|
rlm@479
|
2160 like a normal dot-product angle is.
|
rlm@479
|
2161
|
rlm@479
|
2162 The purpose of these functions is to build a system of angle
|
rlm@517
|
2163 measurement that is biologically plausible.
|
rlm@479
|
2164
|
rlm@479
|
2165 #+caption: Program to measure angles along a vector
|
rlm@479
|
2166 #+name: helpers
|
rlm@479
|
2167 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@479
|
2168 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@479
|
2169 (defn right-handed?
|
rlm@479
|
2170 "true iff the three vectors form a right handed coordinate
|
rlm@479
|
2171 system. The three vectors do not have to be normalized or
|
rlm@479
|
2172 orthogonal."
|
rlm@479
|
2173 [vec1 vec2 vec3]
|
rlm@479
|
2174 (pos? (.dot (.cross vec1 vec2) vec3)))
|
rlm@479
|
2175
|
rlm@479
|
2176 (defn absolute-angle
|
rlm@479
|
2177 "The angle between 'vec1 and 'vec2 around 'axis. In the range
|
rlm@479
|
2178 [0 (* 2 Math/PI)]."
|
rlm@479
|
2179 [vec1 vec2 axis]
|
rlm@479
|
2180 (let [angle (.angleBetween vec1 vec2)]
|
rlm@479
|
2181 (if (right-handed? vec1 vec2 axis)
|
rlm@479
|
2182 angle (- (* 2 Math/PI) angle))))
|
rlm@479
|
2183 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@479
|
2184 #+end_listing
|
rlm@479
|
2185
|
rlm@479
|
2186 *** Proprioception Kernel
|
rlm@479
|
2187
|
rlm@479
|
2188 Given a joint, =proprioception-kernel= produces a function that
|
rlm@545
|
2189 calculates the Euler angles between the objects the joint
|
rlm@479
|
2190 connects. The only tricky part here is making the angles relative
|
rlm@479
|
2191 to the joint's initial ``straightness''.
|
rlm@479
|
2192
|
rlm@517
|
2193 #+caption: Program to return biologically reasonable proprioceptive
|
rlm@479
|
2194 #+caption: data for each joint.
|
rlm@479
|
2195 #+name: proprioception
|
rlm@479
|
2196 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@479
|
2197 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@479
|
2198 (defn proprioception-kernel
|
rlm@479
|
2199 "Returns a function which returns proprioceptive sensory data when
|
rlm@479
|
2200 called inside a running simulation."
|
rlm@479
|
2201 [#^Node parts #^Node joint]
|
rlm@479
|
2202 (let [[obj-a obj-b] (joint-targets parts joint)
|
rlm@479
|
2203 joint-rot (.getWorldRotation joint)
|
rlm@479
|
2204 x0 (.mult joint-rot Vector3f/UNIT_X)
|
rlm@479
|
2205 y0 (.mult joint-rot Vector3f/UNIT_Y)
|
rlm@479
|
2206 z0 (.mult joint-rot Vector3f/UNIT_Z)]
|
rlm@479
|
2207 (fn []
|
rlm@479
|
2208 (let [rot-a (.clone (.getWorldRotation obj-a))
|
rlm@479
|
2209 rot-b (.clone (.getWorldRotation obj-b))
|
rlm@479
|
2210 x (.mult rot-a x0)
|
rlm@479
|
2211 y (.mult rot-a y0)
|
rlm@479
|
2212 z (.mult rot-a z0)
|
rlm@479
|
2213
|
rlm@479
|
2214 X (.mult rot-b x0)
|
rlm@479
|
2215 Y (.mult rot-b y0)
|
rlm@479
|
2216 Z (.mult rot-b z0)
|
rlm@479
|
2217 heading (Math/atan2 (.dot X z) (.dot X x))
|
rlm@479
|
2218 pitch (Math/atan2 (.dot X y) (.dot X x))
|
rlm@479
|
2219
|
rlm@479
|
2220 ;; rotate x-vector back to origin
|
rlm@479
|
2221 reverse
|
rlm@479
|
2222 (doto (Quaternion.)
|
rlm@479
|
2223 (.fromAngleAxis
|
rlm@479
|
2224 (.angleBetween X x)
|
rlm@479
|
2225 (let [cross (.normalize (.cross X x))]
|
rlm@479
|
2226 (if (= 0 (.length cross)) y cross))))
|
rlm@479
|
2227 roll (absolute-angle (.mult reverse Y) y x)]
|
rlm@479
|
2228 [heading pitch roll]))))
|
rlm@479
|
2229
|
rlm@479
|
2230 (defn proprioception!
|
rlm@479
|
2231 "Endow the creature with the sense of proprioception. Returns a
|
rlm@479
|
2232 sequence of functions, one for each child of the \"joints\" node in
|
rlm@479
|
2233 the creature, which each report proprioceptive information about
|
rlm@479
|
2234 that joint."
|
rlm@479
|
2235 [#^Node creature]
|
rlm@479
|
2236 ;; extract the body's joints
|
rlm@479
|
2237 (let [senses (map (partial proprioception-kernel creature)
|
rlm@479
|
2238 (joints creature))]
|
rlm@479
|
2239 (fn []
|
rlm@479
|
2240 (map #(%) senses))))
|
rlm@479
|
2241 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@479
|
2242 #+end_listing
|
rlm@479
|
2243
|
rlm@479
|
2244 =proprioception!= maps =proprioception-kernel= across all the
|
rlm@479
|
2245 joints of the creature. It uses the same list of joints that
|
rlm@479
|
2246 =joints= uses. Proprioception is the easiest sense to implement in
|
rlm@479
|
2247 =CORTEX=, and it will play a crucial role when efficiently
|
rlm@479
|
2248 implementing empathy.
|
rlm@479
|
2249
|
rlm@479
|
2250 #+caption: In the upper right corner, the three proprioceptive
|
rlm@479
|
2251 #+caption: angle measurements are displayed. Red is yaw, Green is
|
rlm@479
|
2252 #+caption: pitch, and White is roll.
|
rlm@479
|
2253 #+name: proprio
|
rlm@479
|
2254 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 11cm
|
rlm@479
|
2255 [[./images/proprio.png]]
|
rlm@479
|
2256
|
rlm@511
|
2257 ** Muscles contain both sensors and effectors
|
rlm@481
|
2258
|
rlm@481
|
2259 Surprisingly enough, terrestrial creatures only move by using
|
rlm@481
|
2260 torque applied about their joints. There's not a single straight
|
rlm@481
|
2261 line of force in the human body at all! (A straight line of force
|
rlm@481
|
2262 would correspond to some sort of jet or rocket propulsion.)
|
rlm@481
|
2263
|
rlm@481
|
2264 In humans, muscles are composed of muscle fibers which can contract
|
rlm@481
|
2265 to exert force. The muscle fibers which compose a muscle are
|
rlm@481
|
2266 partitioned into discrete groups which are each controlled by a
|
rlm@481
|
2267 single alpha motor neuron. A single alpha motor neuron might
|
rlm@481
|
2268 control as little as three or as many as one thousand muscle
|
rlm@481
|
2269 fibers. When the alpha motor neuron is engaged by the spinal cord,
|
rlm@481
|
2270 it activates all of the muscle fibers to which it is attached. The
|
rlm@481
|
2271 spinal cord generally engages the alpha motor neurons which control
|
rlm@481
|
2272 few muscle fibers before the motor neurons which control many
|
rlm@481
|
2273 muscle fibers. This recruitment strategy allows for precise
|
rlm@481
|
2274 movements at low strength. The collection of all motor neurons that
|
rlm@481
|
2275 control a muscle is called the motor pool. The brain essentially
|
rlm@481
|
2276 says "activate 30% of the motor pool" and the spinal cord recruits
|
rlm@481
|
2277 motor neurons until 30% are activated. Since the distribution of
|
rlm@481
|
2278 power among motor neurons is unequal and recruitment goes from
|
rlm@481
|
2279 weakest to strongest, the first 30% of the motor pool might be 5%
|
rlm@481
|
2280 of the strength of the muscle.
|
rlm@481
|
2281
|
rlm@481
|
2282 My simulated muscles follow a similar design: Each muscle is
|
rlm@481
|
2283 defined by a 1-D array of numbers (the "motor pool"). Each entry in
|
rlm@481
|
2284 the array represents a motor neuron which controls a number of
|
rlm@481
|
2285 muscle fibers equal to the value of the entry. Each muscle has a
|
rlm@481
|
2286 scalar strength factor which determines the total force the muscle
|
rlm@481
|
2287 can exert when all motor neurons are activated. The effector
|
rlm@481
|
2288 function for a muscle takes a number to index into the motor pool,
|
rlm@481
|
2289 and then "activates" all the motor neurons whose index is lower or
|
rlm@481
|
2290 equal to the number. Each motor-neuron will apply force in
|
rlm@481
|
2291 proportion to its value in the array. Lower values cause less
|
rlm@481
|
2292 force. The lower values can be put at the "beginning" of the 1-D
|
rlm@481
|
2293 array to simulate the layout of actual human muscles, which are
|
rlm@481
|
2294 capable of more precise movements when exerting less force. Or, the
|
rlm@481
|
2295 motor pool can simulate more exotic recruitment strategies which do
|
rlm@481
|
2296 not correspond to human muscles.
|
rlm@481
|
2297
|
rlm@481
|
2298 This 1D array is defined in an image file for ease of
|
rlm@481
|
2299 creation/visualization. Here is an example muscle profile image.
|
rlm@481
|
2300
|
rlm@481
|
2301 #+caption: A muscle profile image that describes the strengths
|
rlm@481
|
2302 #+caption: of each motor neuron in a muscle. White is weakest
|
rlm@481
|
2303 #+caption: and dark red is strongest. This particular pattern
|
rlm@481
|
2304 #+caption: has weaker motor neurons at the beginning, just
|
rlm@481
|
2305 #+caption: like human muscle.
|
rlm@481
|
2306 #+name: muscle-recruit
|
rlm@481
|
2307 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 7cm
|
rlm@481
|
2308 [[./images/basic-muscle.png]]
|
rlm@481
|
2309
|
rlm@481
|
2310 *** Muscle meta-data
|
rlm@481
|
2311
|
rlm@481
|
2312 #+caption: Program to deal with loading muscle data from a blender
|
rlm@481
|
2313 #+caption: file's metadata.
|
rlm@481
|
2314 #+name: motor-pool
|
rlm@481
|
2315 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@481
|
2316 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@481
|
2317 (defn muscle-profile-image
|
rlm@481
|
2318 "Get the muscle-profile image from the node's blender meta-data."
|
rlm@481
|
2319 [#^Node muscle]
|
rlm@481
|
2320 (if-let [image (meta-data muscle "muscle")]
|
rlm@481
|
2321 (load-image image)))
|
rlm@481
|
2322
|
rlm@481
|
2323 (defn muscle-strength
|
rlm@481
|
2324 "Return the strength of this muscle, or 1 if it is not defined."
|
rlm@481
|
2325 [#^Node muscle]
|
rlm@481
|
2326 (if-let [strength (meta-data muscle "strength")]
|
rlm@481
|
2327 strength 1))
|
rlm@481
|
2328
|
rlm@481
|
2329 (defn motor-pool
|
rlm@481
|
2330 "Return a vector where each entry is the strength of the \"motor
|
rlm@481
|
2331 neuron\" at that part in the muscle."
|
rlm@481
|
2332 [#^Node muscle]
|
rlm@481
|
2333 (let [profile (muscle-profile-image muscle)]
|
rlm@481
|
2334 (vec
|
rlm@481
|
2335 (let [width (.getWidth profile)]
|
rlm@481
|
2336 (for [x (range width)]
|
rlm@481
|
2337 (- 255
|
rlm@481
|
2338 (bit-and
|
rlm@481
|
2339 0x0000FF
|
rlm@481
|
2340 (.getRGB profile x 0))))))))
|
rlm@481
|
2341 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@481
|
2342 #+end_listing
|
rlm@481
|
2343
|
rlm@481
|
2344 Of note here is =motor-pool= which interprets the muscle-profile
|
rlm@481
|
2345 image in a way that allows me to use gradients between white and
|
rlm@481
|
2346 red, instead of shades of gray as I've been using for all the
|
rlm@481
|
2347 other senses. This is purely an aesthetic touch.
|
rlm@481
|
2348
|
rlm@481
|
2349 *** Creating muscles
|
rlm@481
|
2350
|
rlm@517
|
2351 #+caption: This is the core movement function in =CORTEX=, which
|
rlm@481
|
2352 #+caption: implements muscles that report on their activation.
|
rlm@481
|
2353 #+name: muscle-kernel
|
rlm@481
|
2354 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@481
|
2355 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@481
|
2356 (defn movement-kernel
|
rlm@481
|
2357 "Returns a function which when called with a integer value inside a
|
rlm@481
|
2358 running simulation will cause movement in the creature according
|
rlm@481
|
2359 to the muscle's position and strength profile. Each function
|
rlm@481
|
2360 returns the amount of force applied / max force."
|
rlm@481
|
2361 [#^Node creature #^Node muscle]
|
rlm@481
|
2362 (let [target (closest-node creature muscle)
|
rlm@481
|
2363 axis
|
rlm@481
|
2364 (.mult (.getWorldRotation muscle) Vector3f/UNIT_Y)
|
rlm@481
|
2365 strength (muscle-strength muscle)
|
rlm@481
|
2366
|
rlm@481
|
2367 pool (motor-pool muscle)
|
rlm@481
|
2368 pool-integral (reductions + pool)
|
rlm@481
|
2369 forces
|
rlm@481
|
2370 (vec (map #(float (* strength (/ % (last pool-integral))))
|
rlm@481
|
2371 pool-integral))
|
rlm@481
|
2372 control (.getControl target RigidBodyControl)]
|
rlm@481
|
2373 ;;(println-repl (.getName target) axis)
|
rlm@481
|
2374 (fn [n]
|
rlm@481
|
2375 (let [pool-index (max 0 (min n (dec (count pool))))
|
rlm@481
|
2376 force (forces pool-index)]
|
rlm@481
|
2377 (.applyTorque control (.mult axis force))
|
rlm@481
|
2378 (float (/ force strength))))))
|
rlm@481
|
2379
|
rlm@481
|
2380 (defn movement!
|
rlm@481
|
2381 "Endow the creature with the power of movement. Returns a sequence
|
rlm@481
|
2382 of functions, each of which accept an integer value and will
|
rlm@481
|
2383 activate their corresponding muscle."
|
rlm@481
|
2384 [#^Node creature]
|
rlm@481
|
2385 (for [muscle (muscles creature)]
|
rlm@481
|
2386 (movement-kernel creature muscle)))
|
rlm@481
|
2387 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@481
|
2388 #+end_listing
|
rlm@481
|
2389
|
rlm@481
|
2390
|
rlm@531
|
2391 =movement-kernel= creates a function that controls the movement
|
rlm@525
|
2392 of the nearest physical node to the muscle node. The muscle exerts
|
rlm@525
|
2393 a rotational force dependent on it's orientation to the object in
|
rlm@525
|
2394 the blender file. The function returned by =movement-kernel= is
|
rlm@525
|
2395 also a sense function: it returns the percent of the total muscle
|
rlm@525
|
2396 strength that is currently being employed. This is analogous to
|
rlm@525
|
2397 muscle tension in humans and completes the sense of proprioception
|
rlm@551
|
2398 begun in the last chapter.
|
rlm@488
|
2399
|
rlm@507
|
2400 ** =CORTEX= brings complex creatures to life!
|
rlm@483
|
2401
|
rlm@483
|
2402 The ultimate test of =CORTEX= is to create a creature with the full
|
rlm@483
|
2403 gamut of senses and put it though its paces.
|
rlm@483
|
2404
|
rlm@483
|
2405 With all senses enabled, my right hand model looks like an
|
rlm@483
|
2406 intricate marionette hand with several strings for each finger:
|
rlm@483
|
2407
|
rlm@483
|
2408 #+caption: View of the hand model with all sense nodes. You can see
|
rlm@517
|
2409 #+caption: the joint, muscle, ear, and eye nodes here.
|
rlm@483
|
2410 #+name: hand-nodes-1
|
rlm@483
|
2411 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 11cm
|
rlm@483
|
2412 [[./images/hand-with-all-senses2.png]]
|
rlm@483
|
2413
|
rlm@483
|
2414 #+caption: An alternate view of the hand.
|
rlm@483
|
2415 #+name: hand-nodes-2
|
rlm@484
|
2416 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 15cm
|
rlm@484
|
2417 [[./images/hand-with-all-senses3.png]]
|
rlm@484
|
2418
|
rlm@484
|
2419 With the hand fully rigged with senses, I can run it though a test
|
rlm@484
|
2420 that will test everything.
|
rlm@484
|
2421
|
rlm@517
|
2422 #+caption: A full test of the hand with all senses. Note especially
|
rlm@495
|
2423 #+caption: the interactions the hand has with itself: it feels
|
rlm@484
|
2424 #+caption: its own palm and fingers, and when it curls its fingers,
|
rlm@484
|
2425 #+caption: it sees them with its eye (which is located in the center
|
rlm@484
|
2426 #+caption: of the palm. The red block appears with a pure tone sound.
|
rlm@484
|
2427 #+caption: The hand then uses its muscles to launch the cube!
|
rlm@484
|
2428 #+name: integration
|
rlm@484
|
2429 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 16cm
|
rlm@484
|
2430 [[./images/integration.png]]
|
rlm@436
|
2431
|
rlm@517
|
2432 ** =CORTEX= enables many possibilities for further research
|
rlm@485
|
2433
|
rlm@485
|
2434 Often times, the hardest part of building a system involving
|
rlm@485
|
2435 creatures is dealing with physics and graphics. =CORTEX= removes
|
rlm@485
|
2436 much of this initial difficulty and leaves researchers free to
|
rlm@485
|
2437 directly pursue their ideas. I hope that even undergrads with a
|
rlm@485
|
2438 passing curiosity about simulated touch or creature evolution will
|
rlm@485
|
2439 be able to use cortex for experimentation. =CORTEX= is a completely
|
rlm@485
|
2440 simulated world, and far from being a disadvantage, its simulated
|
rlm@485
|
2441 nature enables you to create senses and creatures that would be
|
rlm@485
|
2442 impossible to make in the real world.
|
rlm@485
|
2443
|
rlm@485
|
2444 While not by any means a complete list, here are some paths
|
rlm@485
|
2445 =CORTEX= is well suited to help you explore:
|
rlm@485
|
2446
|
rlm@485
|
2447 - Empathy :: my empathy program leaves many areas for
|
rlm@485
|
2448 improvement, among which are using vision to infer
|
rlm@485
|
2449 proprioception and looking up sensory experience with imagined
|
rlm@485
|
2450 vision, touch, and sound.
|
rlm@547
|
2451 - Evolution :: Karl Sims created a rich environment for simulating
|
rlm@547
|
2452 the evolution of creatures on a Connection Machine
|
rlm@547
|
2453 (\cite{sims-evolving-creatures}). Today, this can be redone
|
rlm@547
|
2454 and expanded with =CORTEX= on an ordinary computer.
|
rlm@485
|
2455 - Exotic senses :: Cortex enables many fascinating senses that are
|
rlm@485
|
2456 not possible to build in the real world. For example,
|
rlm@485
|
2457 telekinesis is an interesting avenue to explore. You can also
|
rlm@485
|
2458 make a ``semantic'' sense which looks up metadata tags on
|
rlm@485
|
2459 objects in the environment the metadata tags might contain
|
rlm@485
|
2460 other sensory information.
|
rlm@485
|
2461 - Imagination via subworlds :: this would involve a creature with
|
rlm@485
|
2462 an effector which creates an entire new sub-simulation where
|
rlm@485
|
2463 the creature has direct control over placement/creation of
|
rlm@485
|
2464 objects via simulated telekinesis. The creature observes this
|
rlm@547
|
2465 sub-world through its normal senses and uses its observations
|
rlm@485
|
2466 to make predictions about its top level world.
|
rlm@485
|
2467 - Simulated prescience :: step the simulation forward a few ticks,
|
rlm@485
|
2468 gather sensory data, then supply this data for the creature as
|
rlm@485
|
2469 one of its actual senses. The cost of prescience is slowing
|
rlm@485
|
2470 the simulation down by a factor proportional to however far
|
rlm@485
|
2471 you want the entities to see into the future. What happens
|
rlm@485
|
2472 when two evolved creatures that can each see into the future
|
rlm@485
|
2473 fight each other?
|
rlm@485
|
2474 - Swarm creatures :: Program a group of creatures that cooperate
|
rlm@485
|
2475 with each other. Because the creatures would be simulated, you
|
rlm@485
|
2476 could investigate computationally complex rules of behavior
|
rlm@485
|
2477 which still, from the group's point of view, would happen in
|
rlm@547
|
2478 real time. Interactions could be as simple as cellular
|
rlm@485
|
2479 organisms communicating via flashing lights, or as complex as
|
rlm@485
|
2480 humanoids completing social tasks, etc.
|
rlm@547
|
2481 - =HACKER= for writing muscle-control programs :: Presented with a
|
rlm@547
|
2482 low-level muscle control / sense API, generate higher level
|
rlm@485
|
2483 programs for accomplishing various stated goals. Example goals
|
rlm@485
|
2484 might be "extend all your fingers" or "move your hand into the
|
rlm@485
|
2485 area with blue light" or "decrease the angle of this joint".
|
rlm@485
|
2486 It would be like Sussman's HACKER, except it would operate
|
rlm@485
|
2487 with much more data in a more realistic world. Start off with
|
rlm@485
|
2488 "calisthenics" to develop subroutines over the motor control
|
rlm@547
|
2489 API. The low level programming code might be a turning machine
|
rlm@547
|
2490 that could develop programs to iterate over a "tape" where
|
rlm@547
|
2491 each entry in the tape could control recruitment of the fibers
|
rlm@547
|
2492 in a muscle.
|
rlm@547
|
2493 - Sense fusion :: There is much work to be done on sense
|
rlm@485
|
2494 integration -- building up a coherent picture of the world and
|
rlm@547
|
2495 the things in it. With =CORTEX= as a base, you can explore
|
rlm@485
|
2496 concepts like self-organizing maps or cross modal clustering
|
rlm@485
|
2497 in ways that have never before been tried.
|
rlm@485
|
2498 - Inverse kinematics :: experiments in sense guided motor control
|
rlm@485
|
2499 are easy given =CORTEX='s support -- you can get right to the
|
rlm@485
|
2500 hard control problems without worrying about physics or
|
rlm@485
|
2501 senses.
|
rlm@485
|
2502
|
rlm@525
|
2503 \newpage
|
rlm@525
|
2504
|
rlm@551
|
2505 * COMMENT =EMPATH=: action recognition in a simulated worm
|
rlm@435
|
2506
|
rlm@449
|
2507 Here I develop a computational model of empathy, using =CORTEX= as a
|
rlm@449
|
2508 base. Empathy in this context is the ability to observe another
|
rlm@449
|
2509 creature and infer what sorts of sensations that creature is
|
rlm@449
|
2510 feeling. My empathy algorithm involves multiple phases. First is
|
rlm@449
|
2511 free-play, where the creature moves around and gains sensory
|
rlm@449
|
2512 experience. From this experience I construct a representation of the
|
rlm@449
|
2513 creature's sensory state space, which I call \Phi-space. Using
|
rlm@449
|
2514 \Phi-space, I construct an efficient function which takes the
|
rlm@449
|
2515 limited data that comes from observing another creature and enriches
|
rlm@525
|
2516 it with a full compliment of imagined sensory data. I can then use
|
rlm@525
|
2517 the imagined sensory data to recognize what the observed creature is
|
rlm@449
|
2518 doing and feeling, using straightforward embodied action predicates.
|
rlm@449
|
2519 This is all demonstrated with using a simple worm-like creature, and
|
rlm@449
|
2520 recognizing worm-actions based on limited data.
|
rlm@449
|
2521
|
rlm@449
|
2522 #+caption: Here is the worm with which we will be working.
|
rlm@449
|
2523 #+caption: It is composed of 5 segments. Each segment has a
|
rlm@449
|
2524 #+caption: pair of extensor and flexor muscles. Each of the
|
rlm@449
|
2525 #+caption: worm's four joints is a hinge joint which allows
|
rlm@451
|
2526 #+caption: about 30 degrees of rotation to either side. Each segment
|
rlm@449
|
2527 #+caption: of the worm is touch-capable and has a uniform
|
rlm@449
|
2528 #+caption: distribution of touch sensors on each of its faces.
|
rlm@449
|
2529 #+caption: Each joint has a proprioceptive sense to detect
|
rlm@449
|
2530 #+caption: relative positions. The worm segments are all the
|
rlm@449
|
2531 #+caption: same except for the first one, which has a much
|
rlm@449
|
2532 #+caption: higher weight than the others to allow for easy
|
rlm@449
|
2533 #+caption: manual motor control.
|
rlm@449
|
2534 #+name: basic-worm-view
|
rlm@449
|
2535 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@449
|
2536 [[./images/basic-worm-view.png]]
|
rlm@449
|
2537
|
rlm@449
|
2538 #+caption: Program for reading a worm from a blender file and
|
rlm@449
|
2539 #+caption: outfitting it with the senses of proprioception,
|
rlm@449
|
2540 #+caption: touch, and the ability to move, as specified in the
|
rlm@449
|
2541 #+caption: blender file.
|
rlm@449
|
2542 #+name: get-worm
|
rlm@449
|
2543 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2544 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2545 (defn worm []
|
rlm@449
|
2546 (let [model (load-blender-model "Models/worm/worm.blend")]
|
rlm@449
|
2547 {:body (doto model (body!))
|
rlm@449
|
2548 :touch (touch! model)
|
rlm@449
|
2549 :proprioception (proprioception! model)
|
rlm@449
|
2550 :muscles (movement! model)}))
|
rlm@449
|
2551 #+end_src
|
rlm@449
|
2552 #+end_listing
|
rlm@452
|
2553
|
rlm@531
|
2554 ** Embodiment factors action recognition into manageable parts
|
rlm@435
|
2555
|
rlm@449
|
2556 Using empathy, I divide the problem of action recognition into a
|
rlm@449
|
2557 recognition process expressed in the language of a full compliment
|
rlm@517
|
2558 of senses, and an imaginative process that generates full sensory
|
rlm@449
|
2559 data from partial sensory data. Splitting the action recognition
|
rlm@449
|
2560 problem in this manner greatly reduces the total amount of work to
|
rlm@517
|
2561 recognize actions: The imaginative process is mostly just matching
|
rlm@449
|
2562 previous experience, and the recognition process gets to use all
|
rlm@449
|
2563 the senses to directly describe any action.
|
rlm@449
|
2564
|
rlm@436
|
2565 ** Action recognition is easy with a full gamut of senses
|
rlm@435
|
2566
|
rlm@449
|
2567 Embodied representations using multiple senses such as touch,
|
rlm@545
|
2568 proprioception, and muscle tension turns out be exceedingly
|
rlm@525
|
2569 efficient at describing body-centered actions. It is the right
|
rlm@525
|
2570 language for the job. For example, it takes only around 5 lines of
|
rlm@525
|
2571 LISP code to describe the action of curling using embodied
|
rlm@451
|
2572 primitives. It takes about 10 lines to describe the seemingly
|
rlm@449
|
2573 complicated action of wiggling.
|
rlm@449
|
2574
|
rlm@449
|
2575 The following action predicates each take a stream of sensory
|
rlm@449
|
2576 experience, observe however much of it they desire, and decide
|
rlm@449
|
2577 whether the worm is doing the action they describe. =curled?=
|
rlm@449
|
2578 relies on proprioception, =resting?= relies on touch, =wiggling?=
|
rlm@517
|
2579 relies on a Fourier analysis of muscle contraction, and
|
rlm@525
|
2580 =grand-circle?= relies on touch and reuses =curled?= in its
|
rlm@525
|
2581 definition, showing how embodied predicates can be composed.
|
rlm@449
|
2582
|
rlm@530
|
2583
|
rlm@449
|
2584 #+caption: Program for detecting whether the worm is curled. This is the
|
rlm@449
|
2585 #+caption: simplest action predicate, because it only uses the last frame
|
rlm@449
|
2586 #+caption: of sensory experience, and only uses proprioceptive data. Even
|
rlm@449
|
2587 #+caption: this simple predicate, however, is automatically frame
|
rlm@530
|
2588 #+caption: independent and ignores vermopomorphic\protect\footnotemark
|
rlm@532
|
2589 #+caption: \space differences such as worm textures and colors.
|
rlm@449
|
2590 #+name: curled
|
rlm@509
|
2591 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2592 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2593 (defn curled?
|
rlm@449
|
2594 "Is the worm curled up?"
|
rlm@449
|
2595 [experiences]
|
rlm@449
|
2596 (every?
|
rlm@449
|
2597 (fn [[_ _ bend]]
|
rlm@449
|
2598 (> (Math/sin bend) 0.64))
|
rlm@449
|
2599 (:proprioception (peek experiences))))
|
rlm@449
|
2600 #+end_src
|
rlm@449
|
2601 #+end_listing
|
rlm@530
|
2602
|
rlm@530
|
2603 #+BEGIN_LaTeX
|
rlm@530
|
2604 \footnotetext{Like \emph{anthropomorphic} except for worms instead of humans.}
|
rlm@530
|
2605 #+END_LaTeX
|
rlm@449
|
2606
|
rlm@449
|
2607 #+caption: Program for summarizing the touch information in a patch
|
rlm@449
|
2608 #+caption: of skin.
|
rlm@449
|
2609 #+name: touch-summary
|
rlm@509
|
2610 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2611 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2612 (defn contact
|
rlm@449
|
2613 "Determine how much contact a particular worm segment has with
|
rlm@449
|
2614 other objects. Returns a value between 0 and 1, where 1 is full
|
rlm@449
|
2615 contact and 0 is no contact."
|
rlm@449
|
2616 [touch-region [coords contact :as touch]]
|
rlm@449
|
2617 (-> (zipmap coords contact)
|
rlm@449
|
2618 (select-keys touch-region)
|
rlm@449
|
2619 (vals)
|
rlm@449
|
2620 (#(map first %))
|
rlm@449
|
2621 (average)
|
rlm@449
|
2622 (* 10)
|
rlm@449
|
2623 (- 1)
|
rlm@449
|
2624 (Math/abs)))
|
rlm@449
|
2625 #+end_src
|
rlm@449
|
2626 #+end_listing
|
rlm@449
|
2627
|
rlm@449
|
2628
|
rlm@449
|
2629 #+caption: Program for detecting whether the worm is at rest. This program
|
rlm@449
|
2630 #+caption: uses a summary of the tactile information from the underbelly
|
rlm@449
|
2631 #+caption: of the worm, and is only true if every segment is touching the
|
rlm@449
|
2632 #+caption: floor. Note that this function contains no references to
|
rlm@517
|
2633 #+caption: proprioception at all.
|
rlm@449
|
2634 #+name: resting
|
rlm@452
|
2635 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2636 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2637 (def worm-segment-bottom (rect-region [8 15] [14 22]))
|
rlm@449
|
2638
|
rlm@449
|
2639 (defn resting?
|
rlm@449
|
2640 "Is the worm resting on the ground?"
|
rlm@449
|
2641 [experiences]
|
rlm@449
|
2642 (every?
|
rlm@449
|
2643 (fn [touch-data]
|
rlm@449
|
2644 (< 0.9 (contact worm-segment-bottom touch-data)))
|
rlm@449
|
2645 (:touch (peek experiences))))
|
rlm@449
|
2646 #+end_src
|
rlm@449
|
2647 #+end_listing
|
rlm@449
|
2648
|
rlm@449
|
2649 #+caption: Program for detecting whether the worm is curled up into a
|
rlm@449
|
2650 #+caption: full circle. Here the embodied approach begins to shine, as
|
rlm@449
|
2651 #+caption: I am able to both use a previous action predicate (=curled?=)
|
rlm@449
|
2652 #+caption: as well as the direct tactile experience of the head and tail.
|
rlm@449
|
2653 #+name: grand-circle
|
rlm@452
|
2654 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2655 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2656 (def worm-segment-bottom-tip (rect-region [15 15] [22 22]))
|
rlm@449
|
2657
|
rlm@449
|
2658 (def worm-segment-top-tip (rect-region [0 15] [7 22]))
|
rlm@449
|
2659
|
rlm@449
|
2660 (defn grand-circle?
|
rlm@449
|
2661 "Does the worm form a majestic circle (one end touching the other)?"
|
rlm@449
|
2662 [experiences]
|
rlm@449
|
2663 (and (curled? experiences)
|
rlm@449
|
2664 (let [worm-touch (:touch (peek experiences))
|
rlm@449
|
2665 tail-touch (worm-touch 0)
|
rlm@449
|
2666 head-touch (worm-touch 4)]
|
rlm@449
|
2667 (and (< 0.55 (contact worm-segment-bottom-tip tail-touch))
|
rlm@449
|
2668 (< 0.55 (contact worm-segment-top-tip head-touch))))))
|
rlm@449
|
2669 #+end_src
|
rlm@449
|
2670 #+end_listing
|
rlm@449
|
2671
|
rlm@449
|
2672
|
rlm@449
|
2673 #+caption: Program for detecting whether the worm has been wiggling for
|
rlm@517
|
2674 #+caption: the last few frames. It uses a Fourier analysis of the muscle
|
rlm@449
|
2675 #+caption: contractions of the worm's tail to determine wiggling. This is
|
rlm@517
|
2676 #+caption: significant because there is no particular frame that clearly
|
rlm@449
|
2677 #+caption: indicates that the worm is wiggling --- only when multiple frames
|
rlm@449
|
2678 #+caption: are analyzed together is the wiggling revealed. Defining
|
rlm@449
|
2679 #+caption: wiggling this way also gives the worm an opportunity to learn
|
rlm@449
|
2680 #+caption: and recognize ``frustrated wiggling'', where the worm tries to
|
rlm@449
|
2681 #+caption: wiggle but can't. Frustrated wiggling is very visually different
|
rlm@449
|
2682 #+caption: from actual wiggling, but this definition gives it to us for free.
|
rlm@449
|
2683 #+name: wiggling
|
rlm@452
|
2684 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2685 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2686 (defn fft [nums]
|
rlm@449
|
2687 (map
|
rlm@449
|
2688 #(.getReal %)
|
rlm@449
|
2689 (.transform
|
rlm@449
|
2690 (FastFourierTransformer. DftNormalization/STANDARD)
|
rlm@449
|
2691 (double-array nums) TransformType/FORWARD)))
|
rlm@449
|
2692
|
rlm@449
|
2693 (def indexed (partial map-indexed vector))
|
rlm@449
|
2694
|
rlm@449
|
2695 (defn max-indexed [s]
|
rlm@449
|
2696 (first (sort-by (comp - second) (indexed s))))
|
rlm@449
|
2697
|
rlm@449
|
2698 (defn wiggling?
|
rlm@449
|
2699 "Is the worm wiggling?"
|
rlm@449
|
2700 [experiences]
|
rlm@449
|
2701 (let [analysis-interval 0x40]
|
rlm@449
|
2702 (when (> (count experiences) analysis-interval)
|
rlm@449
|
2703 (let [a-flex 3
|
rlm@449
|
2704 a-ex 2
|
rlm@449
|
2705 muscle-activity
|
rlm@449
|
2706 (map :muscle (vector:last-n experiences analysis-interval))
|
rlm@449
|
2707 base-activity
|
rlm@449
|
2708 (map #(- (% a-flex) (% a-ex)) muscle-activity)]
|
rlm@449
|
2709 (= 2
|
rlm@449
|
2710 (first
|
rlm@449
|
2711 (max-indexed
|
rlm@449
|
2712 (map #(Math/abs %)
|
rlm@449
|
2713 (take 20 (fft base-activity))))))))))
|
rlm@449
|
2714 #+end_src
|
rlm@449
|
2715 #+end_listing
|
rlm@449
|
2716
|
rlm@449
|
2717 With these action predicates, I can now recognize the actions of
|
rlm@449
|
2718 the worm while it is moving under my control and I have access to
|
rlm@449
|
2719 all the worm's senses.
|
rlm@449
|
2720
|
rlm@449
|
2721 #+caption: Use the action predicates defined earlier to report on
|
rlm@449
|
2722 #+caption: what the worm is doing while in simulation.
|
rlm@449
|
2723 #+name: report-worm-activity
|
rlm@452
|
2724 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2725 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2726 (defn debug-experience
|
rlm@449
|
2727 [experiences text]
|
rlm@449
|
2728 (cond
|
rlm@449
|
2729 (grand-circle? experiences) (.setText text "Grand Circle")
|
rlm@449
|
2730 (curled? experiences) (.setText text "Curled")
|
rlm@449
|
2731 (wiggling? experiences) (.setText text "Wiggling")
|
rlm@449
|
2732 (resting? experiences) (.setText text "Resting")))
|
rlm@449
|
2733 #+end_src
|
rlm@449
|
2734 #+end_listing
|
rlm@449
|
2735
|
rlm@449
|
2736 #+caption: Using =debug-experience=, the body-centered predicates
|
rlm@517
|
2737 #+caption: work together to classify the behavior of the worm.
|
rlm@451
|
2738 #+caption: the predicates are operating with access to the worm's
|
rlm@451
|
2739 #+caption: full sensory data.
|
rlm@449
|
2740 #+name: basic-worm-view
|
rlm@449
|
2741 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@449
|
2742 [[./images/worm-identify-init.png]]
|
rlm@449
|
2743
|
rlm@449
|
2744 These action predicates satisfy the recognition requirement of an
|
rlm@451
|
2745 empathic recognition system. There is power in the simplicity of
|
rlm@451
|
2746 the action predicates. They describe their actions without getting
|
rlm@531
|
2747 confused in visual details of the worm. Each one is independent of
|
rlm@531
|
2748 position and rotation, but more than that, they are each
|
rlm@531
|
2749 independent of irrelevant visual details of the worm and the
|
rlm@531
|
2750 environment. They will work regardless of whether the worm is a
|
rlm@531
|
2751 different color or heavily textured, or if the environment has
|
rlm@531
|
2752 strange lighting.
|
rlm@531
|
2753
|
rlm@531
|
2754 Consider how the human act of jumping might be described with
|
rlm@531
|
2755 body-centered action predicates: You might specify that jumping is
|
rlm@531
|
2756 mainly the feeling of your knees bending, your thigh muscles
|
rlm@531
|
2757 contracting, and your inner ear experiencing a certain sort of back
|
rlm@531
|
2758 and forth acceleration. This representation is a very concrete
|
rlm@531
|
2759 description of jumping, couched in terms of muscles and senses, but
|
rlm@531
|
2760 it also has the ability to describe almost all kinds of jumping, a
|
rlm@531
|
2761 generality that you might think could only be achieved by a very
|
rlm@531
|
2762 abstract description. The body centered jumping predicate does not
|
rlm@531
|
2763 have terms that consider the color of a person's skin or whether
|
rlm@531
|
2764 they are male or female, instead it gets right to the meat of what
|
rlm@531
|
2765 jumping actually /is/.
|
rlm@531
|
2766
|
rlm@531
|
2767 Of course, the action predicates are not directly applicable to
|
rlm@547
|
2768 video data, which lacks the advanced sensory information which they
|
rlm@531
|
2769 require!
|
rlm@449
|
2770
|
rlm@449
|
2771 The trick now is to make the action predicates work even when the
|
rlm@449
|
2772 sensory data on which they depend is absent. If I can do that, then
|
rlm@525
|
2773 I will have gained much.
|
rlm@435
|
2774
|
rlm@531
|
2775 ** \Phi-space describes the worm's experiences
|
rlm@449
|
2776
|
rlm@449
|
2777 As a first step towards building empathy, I need to gather all of
|
rlm@449
|
2778 the worm's experiences during free play. I use a simple vector to
|
rlm@449
|
2779 store all the experiences.
|
rlm@449
|
2780
|
rlm@449
|
2781 Each element of the experience vector exists in the vast space of
|
rlm@449
|
2782 all possible worm-experiences. Most of this vast space is actually
|
rlm@449
|
2783 unreachable due to physical constraints of the worm's body. For
|
rlm@449
|
2784 example, the worm's segments are connected by hinge joints that put
|
rlm@451
|
2785 a practical limit on the worm's range of motions without limiting
|
rlm@451
|
2786 its degrees of freedom. Some groupings of senses are impossible;
|
rlm@451
|
2787 the worm can not be bent into a circle so that its ends are
|
rlm@451
|
2788 touching and at the same time not also experience the sensation of
|
rlm@451
|
2789 touching itself.
|
rlm@449
|
2790
|
rlm@451
|
2791 As the worm moves around during free play and its experience vector
|
rlm@451
|
2792 grows larger, the vector begins to define a subspace which is all
|
rlm@517
|
2793 the sensations the worm can practically experience during normal
|
rlm@451
|
2794 operation. I call this subspace \Phi-space, short for
|
rlm@451
|
2795 physical-space. The experience vector defines a path through
|
rlm@451
|
2796 \Phi-space. This path has interesting properties that all derive
|
rlm@533
|
2797 from physical embodiment. The proprioceptive components of the path
|
rlm@533
|
2798 vary smoothly, because in order for the worm to move from one
|
rlm@451
|
2799 position to another, it must pass through the intermediate
|
rlm@533
|
2800 positions. The path invariably forms loops as common actions are
|
rlm@533
|
2801 repeated. Finally and most importantly, proprioception alone
|
rlm@533
|
2802 actually gives very strong inference about the other senses. For
|
rlm@533
|
2803 example, when the worm is proprioceptively flat over several
|
rlm@533
|
2804 frames, you can infer that it is touching the ground and that its
|
rlm@451
|
2805 muscles are not active, because if the muscles were active, the
|
rlm@533
|
2806 worm would be moving and would not remain perfectly flat. In order
|
rlm@533
|
2807 to stay flat, the worm has to be touching the ground, or it would
|
rlm@451
|
2808 again be moving out of the flat position due to gravity. If the
|
rlm@451
|
2809 worm is positioned in such a way that it interacts with itself,
|
rlm@451
|
2810 then it is very likely to be feeling the same tactile feelings as
|
rlm@451
|
2811 the last time it was in that position, because it has the same body
|
rlm@533
|
2812 as then. As you observe multiple frames of proprioceptive data, you
|
rlm@533
|
2813 can become increasingly confident about the exact activations of
|
rlm@533
|
2814 the worm's muscles, because it generally takes a unique combination
|
rlm@533
|
2815 of muscle contractions to transform the worm's body along a
|
rlm@533
|
2816 specific path through \Phi-space.
|
rlm@533
|
2817
|
rlm@533
|
2818 The worm's total life experience is a long looping path through
|
rlm@533
|
2819 \Phi-space. I will now introduce simple way of taking that
|
rlm@548
|
2820 experience path and building a function that can infer complete
|
rlm@533
|
2821 sensory experience given only a stream of proprioceptive data. This
|
rlm@533
|
2822 /empathy/ function will provide a bridge to use the body centered
|
rlm@533
|
2823 action predicates on video-like streams of information.
|
rlm@533
|
2824
|
rlm@535
|
2825 ** Empathy is the process of building paths in \Phi-space
|
rlm@449
|
2826
|
rlm@450
|
2827 Here is the core of a basic empathy algorithm, starting with an
|
rlm@451
|
2828 experience vector:
|
rlm@451
|
2829
|
rlm@533
|
2830 An /experience-index/ is an index into the grand experience vector
|
rlm@534
|
2831 that defines the worm's life. It is a time-stamp for each set of
|
rlm@533
|
2832 sensations the worm has experienced.
|
rlm@533
|
2833
|
rlm@533
|
2834 First, group the experience-indices into bins according to the
|
rlm@533
|
2835 similarity of their proprioceptive data. I organize my bins into a
|
rlm@534
|
2836 3 level hierarchy. The smallest bins have an approximate size of
|
rlm@533
|
2837 0.001 radians in all proprioceptive dimensions. Each higher level
|
rlm@533
|
2838 is 10x bigger than the level below it.
|
rlm@533
|
2839
|
rlm@533
|
2840 The bins serve as a hashing function for proprioceptive data. Given
|
rlm@533
|
2841 a single piece of proprioceptive experience, the bins allow us to
|
rlm@534
|
2842 rapidly find all other similar experience-indices of past
|
rlm@534
|
2843 experience that had a very similar proprioceptive configuration.
|
rlm@533
|
2844 When looking up a proprioceptive experience, if the smallest bin
|
rlm@534
|
2845 does not match any previous experience, then successively larger
|
rlm@533
|
2846 bins are used until a match is found or we reach the largest bin.
|
rlm@450
|
2847
|
rlm@533
|
2848 Given a sequence of proprioceptive input, I use the bins to
|
rlm@534
|
2849 generate a set of similar experiences for each input using the
|
rlm@533
|
2850 tiered proprioceptive bins.
|
rlm@533
|
2851
|
rlm@533
|
2852 Finally, to infer sensory data, I select the longest consecutive
|
rlm@534
|
2853 chain of experiences that threads through the sets of similar
|
rlm@535
|
2854 experiences, starting with the current moment as a root and going
|
rlm@535
|
2855 backwards. Consecutive experience means that the experiences appear
|
rlm@535
|
2856 next to each other in the experience vector.
|
rlm@535
|
2857
|
rlm@535
|
2858 A stream of proprioceptive input might be:
|
rlm@533
|
2859
|
rlm@535
|
2860 #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@535
|
2861 [ flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, lift-head ]
|
rlm@535
|
2862 #+END_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@535
|
2863
|
rlm@535
|
2864 The worm's previous experience of lying on the ground and lifting
|
rlm@547
|
2865 its head generates possible interpretations for each frame (the
|
rlm@547
|
2866 numbers are experience-indices):
|
rlm@535
|
2867
|
rlm@535
|
2868 #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@535
|
2869 [ flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, lift-head ]
|
rlm@535
|
2870 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4
|
rlm@535
|
2871 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
|
rlm@535
|
2872 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
|
rlm@535
|
2873 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
|
rlm@535
|
2874 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
|
rlm@535
|
2875 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
|
rlm@535
|
2876 #+END_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@535
|
2877
|
rlm@535
|
2878 These interpretations suggest a new path through phi space:
|
rlm@535
|
2879
|
rlm@535
|
2880 #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@535
|
2881 [ flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, lift-head ]
|
rlm@535
|
2882 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4
|
rlm@535
|
2883 #+END_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@535
|
2884
|
rlm@535
|
2885 The new path through \Phi-space is synthesized from two actual
|
rlm@547
|
2886 paths that the creature has experienced: the "1-2-3-4" chain and
|
rlm@547
|
2887 the "6-7-8-9" chain. The "1-2-3-4" chain is necessary because it
|
rlm@547
|
2888 ends with the worm lifting its head. It originated from a short
|
rlm@535
|
2889 training session where the worm rested on the floor for a brief
|
rlm@535
|
2890 while and then raised its head. The "6-7-8-9" chain is part of a
|
rlm@535
|
2891 longer chain of inactivity where the worm simply rested on the
|
rlm@535
|
2892 floor without moving. It is preferred over a "1-2-3" chain (which
|
rlm@535
|
2893 also describes inactivity) because it is longer. The main ideas
|
rlm@535
|
2894 again:
|
rlm@535
|
2895
|
rlm@535
|
2896 - Imagined \Phi-space paths are synthesized by looping and mixing
|
rlm@535
|
2897 previous experiences.
|
rlm@535
|
2898
|
rlm@535
|
2899 - Longer experience paths (less edits) are preferred.
|
rlm@535
|
2900
|
rlm@535
|
2901 - The present is more important than the past --- more recent
|
rlm@535
|
2902 events take precedence in interpretation.
|
rlm@533
|
2903
|
rlm@450
|
2904 This algorithm has three advantages:
|
rlm@450
|
2905
|
rlm@450
|
2906 1. It's simple
|
rlm@450
|
2907
|
rlm@451
|
2908 3. It's very fast -- retrieving possible interpretations takes
|
rlm@451
|
2909 constant time. Tracing through chains of interpretations takes
|
rlm@451
|
2910 time proportional to the average number of experiences in a
|
rlm@451
|
2911 proprioceptive bin. Redundant experiences in \Phi-space can be
|
rlm@451
|
2912 merged to save computation.
|
rlm@450
|
2913
|
rlm@450
|
2914 2. It protects from wrong interpretations of transient ambiguous
|
rlm@451
|
2915 proprioceptive data. For example, if the worm is flat for just
|
rlm@517
|
2916 an instant, this flatness will not be interpreted as implying
|
rlm@517
|
2917 that the worm has its muscles relaxed, since the flatness is
|
rlm@450
|
2918 part of a longer chain which includes a distinct pattern of
|
rlm@451
|
2919 muscle activation. Markov chains or other memoryless statistical
|
rlm@451
|
2920 models that operate on individual frames may very well make this
|
rlm@451
|
2921 mistake.
|
rlm@450
|
2922
|
rlm@450
|
2923 #+caption: Program to convert an experience vector into a
|
rlm@450
|
2924 #+caption: proprioceptively binned lookup function.
|
rlm@450
|
2925 #+name: bin
|
rlm@452
|
2926 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@450
|
2927 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2928 (defn bin [digits]
|
rlm@449
|
2929 (fn [angles]
|
rlm@449
|
2930 (->> angles
|
rlm@449
|
2931 (flatten)
|
rlm@449
|
2932 (map (juxt #(Math/sin %) #(Math/cos %)))
|
rlm@449
|
2933 (flatten)
|
rlm@449
|
2934 (mapv #(Math/round (* % (Math/pow 10 (dec digits))))))))
|
rlm@449
|
2935
|
rlm@449
|
2936 (defn gen-phi-scan
|
rlm@450
|
2937 "Nearest-neighbors with binning. Only returns a result if
|
rlm@517
|
2938 the proprioceptive data is within 10% of a previously recorded
|
rlm@450
|
2939 result in all dimensions."
|
rlm@450
|
2940 [phi-space]
|
rlm@449
|
2941 (let [bin-keys (map bin [3 2 1])
|
rlm@449
|
2942 bin-maps
|
rlm@449
|
2943 (map (fn [bin-key]
|
rlm@449
|
2944 (group-by
|
rlm@449
|
2945 (comp bin-key :proprioception phi-space)
|
rlm@449
|
2946 (range (count phi-space)))) bin-keys)
|
rlm@449
|
2947 lookups (map (fn [bin-key bin-map]
|
rlm@450
|
2948 (fn [proprio] (bin-map (bin-key proprio))))
|
rlm@450
|
2949 bin-keys bin-maps)]
|
rlm@449
|
2950 (fn lookup [proprio-data]
|
rlm@449
|
2951 (set (some #(% proprio-data) lookups)))))
|
rlm@450
|
2952 #+end_src
|
rlm@450
|
2953 #+end_listing
|
rlm@449
|
2954
|
rlm@451
|
2955 #+caption: =longest-thread= finds the longest path of consecutive
|
rlm@536
|
2956 #+caption: past experiences to explain proprioceptive worm data from
|
rlm@520
|
2957 #+caption: previous data. Here, the film strip represents the
|
rlm@531
|
2958 #+caption: creature's previous experience. Sort sequences of
|
rlm@520
|
2959 #+caption: memories are spliced together to match the
|
rlm@520
|
2960 #+caption: proprioceptive data. Their carry the other senses
|
rlm@520
|
2961 #+caption: along with them.
|
rlm@451
|
2962 #+name: phi-space-history-scan
|
rlm@451
|
2963 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm
|
rlm@520
|
2964 [[./images/film-of-imagination.png]]
|
rlm@451
|
2965
|
rlm@451
|
2966 =longest-thread= infers sensory data by stitching together pieces
|
rlm@451
|
2967 from previous experience. It prefers longer chains of previous
|
rlm@451
|
2968 experience to shorter ones. For example, during training the worm
|
rlm@451
|
2969 might rest on the ground for one second before it performs its
|
rlm@517
|
2970 exercises. If during recognition the worm rests on the ground for
|
rlm@517
|
2971 five seconds, =longest-thread= will accommodate this five second
|
rlm@451
|
2972 rest period by looping the one second rest chain five times.
|
rlm@451
|
2973
|
rlm@517
|
2974 =longest-thread= takes time proportional to the average number of
|
rlm@451
|
2975 entries in a proprioceptive bin, because for each element in the
|
rlm@517
|
2976 starting bin it performs a series of set lookups in the preceding
|
rlm@536
|
2977 bins. If the total history is limited, then this takes time
|
rlm@548
|
2978 proportional to a only a constant multiple of the number of entries
|
rlm@536
|
2979 in the starting bin. This analysis also applies, even if the action
|
rlm@536
|
2980 requires multiple longest chains -- it's still the average number
|
rlm@536
|
2981 of entries in a proprioceptive bin times the desired chain length.
|
rlm@536
|
2982 Because =longest-thread= is so efficient and simple, I can
|
rlm@536
|
2983 interpret worm-actions in real time.
|
rlm@449
|
2984
|
rlm@450
|
2985 #+caption: Program to calculate empathy by tracing though \Phi-space
|
rlm@450
|
2986 #+caption: and finding the longest (ie. most coherent) interpretation
|
rlm@450
|
2987 #+caption: of the data.
|
rlm@450
|
2988 #+name: longest-thread
|
rlm@452
|
2989 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@450
|
2990 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
2991 (defn longest-thread
|
rlm@449
|
2992 "Find the longest thread from phi-index-sets. The index sets should
|
rlm@449
|
2993 be ordered from most recent to least recent."
|
rlm@449
|
2994 [phi-index-sets]
|
rlm@449
|
2995 (loop [result '()
|
rlm@449
|
2996 [thread-bases & remaining :as phi-index-sets] phi-index-sets]
|
rlm@449
|
2997 (if (empty? phi-index-sets)
|
rlm@449
|
2998 (vec result)
|
rlm@449
|
2999 (let [threads
|
rlm@449
|
3000 (for [thread-base thread-bases]
|
rlm@449
|
3001 (loop [thread (list thread-base)
|
rlm@449
|
3002 remaining remaining]
|
rlm@449
|
3003 (let [next-index (dec (first thread))]
|
rlm@449
|
3004 (cond (empty? remaining) thread
|
rlm@449
|
3005 (contains? (first remaining) next-index)
|
rlm@449
|
3006 (recur
|
rlm@449
|
3007 (cons next-index thread) (rest remaining))
|
rlm@449
|
3008 :else thread))))
|
rlm@449
|
3009 longest-thread
|
rlm@449
|
3010 (reduce (fn [thread-a thread-b]
|
rlm@449
|
3011 (if (> (count thread-a) (count thread-b))
|
rlm@449
|
3012 thread-a thread-b))
|
rlm@449
|
3013 '(nil)
|
rlm@449
|
3014 threads)]
|
rlm@449
|
3015 (recur (concat longest-thread result)
|
rlm@449
|
3016 (drop (count longest-thread) phi-index-sets))))))
|
rlm@450
|
3017 #+end_src
|
rlm@450
|
3018 #+end_listing
|
rlm@450
|
3019
|
rlm@451
|
3020 There is one final piece, which is to replace missing sensory data
|
rlm@451
|
3021 with a best-guess estimate. While I could fill in missing data by
|
rlm@451
|
3022 using a gradient over the closest known sensory data points,
|
rlm@451
|
3023 averages can be misleading. It is certainly possible to create an
|
rlm@451
|
3024 impossible sensory state by averaging two possible sensory states.
|
rlm@536
|
3025 For example, consider moving your hand in an arc over your head. If
|
rlm@536
|
3026 for some reason you only have the initial and final positions of
|
rlm@536
|
3027 this movement in your \Phi-space, averaging them together will
|
rlm@536
|
3028 produce the proprioceptive sensation of having your hand /inside/
|
rlm@536
|
3029 your head, which is physically impossible to ever experience
|
rlm@536
|
3030 (barring motor adaption illusions). Therefore I simply replicate
|
rlm@536
|
3031 the most recent sensory experience to fill in the gaps.
|
rlm@449
|
3032
|
rlm@449
|
3033 #+caption: Fill in blanks in sensory experience by replicating the most
|
rlm@449
|
3034 #+caption: recent experience.
|
rlm@449
|
3035 #+name: infer-nils
|
rlm@452
|
3036 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@449
|
3037 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@449
|
3038 (defn infer-nils
|
rlm@449
|
3039 "Replace nils with the next available non-nil element in the
|
rlm@449
|
3040 sequence, or barring that, 0."
|
rlm@449
|
3041 [s]
|
rlm@449
|
3042 (loop [i (dec (count s))
|
rlm@449
|
3043 v (transient s)]
|
rlm@449
|
3044 (if (zero? i) (persistent! v)
|
rlm@449
|
3045 (if-let [cur (v i)]
|
rlm@449
|
3046 (if (get v (dec i) 0)
|
rlm@449
|
3047 (recur (dec i) v)
|
rlm@449
|
3048 (recur (dec i) (assoc! v (dec i) cur)))
|
rlm@449
|
3049 (recur i (assoc! v i 0))))))
|
rlm@449
|
3050 #+end_src
|
rlm@449
|
3051 #+end_listing
|
rlm@435
|
3052
|
rlm@541
|
3053 ** =EMPATH= recognizes actions efficiently
|
rlm@451
|
3054
|
rlm@451
|
3055 To use =EMPATH= with the worm, I first need to gather a set of
|
rlm@451
|
3056 experiences from the worm that includes the actions I want to
|
rlm@452
|
3057 recognize. The =generate-phi-space= program (listing
|
rlm@451
|
3058 \ref{generate-phi-space} runs the worm through a series of
|
rlm@545
|
3059 exercises and gathers those experiences into a vector. The
|
rlm@451
|
3060 =do-all-the-things= program is a routine expressed in a simple
|
rlm@452
|
3061 muscle contraction script language for automated worm control. It
|
rlm@452
|
3062 causes the worm to rest, curl, and wiggle over about 700 frames
|
rlm@452
|
3063 (approx. 11 seconds).
|
rlm@425
|
3064
|
rlm@451
|
3065 #+caption: Program to gather the worm's experiences into a vector for
|
rlm@451
|
3066 #+caption: further processing. The =motor-control-program= line uses
|
rlm@451
|
3067 #+caption: a motor control script that causes the worm to execute a series
|
rlm@517
|
3068 #+caption: of ``exercises'' that include all the action predicates.
|
rlm@451
|
3069 #+name: generate-phi-space
|
rlm@452
|
3070 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@451
|
3071 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@451
|
3072 (def do-all-the-things
|
rlm@451
|
3073 (concat
|
rlm@451
|
3074 curl-script
|
rlm@451
|
3075 [[300 :d-ex 40]
|
rlm@451
|
3076 [320 :d-ex 0]]
|
rlm@451
|
3077 (shift-script 280 (take 16 wiggle-script))))
|
rlm@451
|
3078
|
rlm@451
|
3079 (defn generate-phi-space []
|
rlm@451
|
3080 (let [experiences (atom [])]
|
rlm@451
|
3081 (run-world
|
rlm@451
|
3082 (apply-map
|
rlm@451
|
3083 worm-world
|
rlm@451
|
3084 (merge
|
rlm@451
|
3085 (worm-world-defaults)
|
rlm@451
|
3086 {:end-frame 700
|
rlm@451
|
3087 :motor-control
|
rlm@451
|
3088 (motor-control-program worm-muscle-labels do-all-the-things)
|
rlm@451
|
3089 :experiences experiences})))
|
rlm@451
|
3090 @experiences))
|
rlm@451
|
3091 #+end_src
|
rlm@451
|
3092 #+end_listing
|
rlm@451
|
3093
|
rlm@536
|
3094 #+caption: Use =longest-thread= and a \Phi-space generated from a short
|
rlm@451
|
3095 #+caption: exercise routine to interpret actions during free play.
|
rlm@451
|
3096 #+name: empathy-debug
|
rlm@452
|
3097 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@451
|
3098 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@451
|
3099 (defn init []
|
rlm@451
|
3100 (def phi-space (generate-phi-space))
|
rlm@451
|
3101 (def phi-scan (gen-phi-scan phi-space)))
|
rlm@451
|
3102
|
rlm@451
|
3103 (defn empathy-demonstration []
|
rlm@451
|
3104 (let [proprio (atom ())]
|
rlm@451
|
3105 (fn
|
rlm@451
|
3106 [experiences text]
|
rlm@451
|
3107 (let [phi-indices (phi-scan (:proprioception (peek experiences)))]
|
rlm@451
|
3108 (swap! proprio (partial cons phi-indices))
|
rlm@451
|
3109 (let [exp-thread (longest-thread (take 300 @proprio))
|
rlm@451
|
3110 empathy (mapv phi-space (infer-nils exp-thread))]
|
rlm@451
|
3111 (println-repl (vector:last-n exp-thread 22))
|
rlm@451
|
3112 (cond
|
rlm@451
|
3113 (grand-circle? empathy) (.setText text "Grand Circle")
|
rlm@451
|
3114 (curled? empathy) (.setText text "Curled")
|
rlm@451
|
3115 (wiggling? empathy) (.setText text "Wiggling")
|
rlm@451
|
3116 (resting? empathy) (.setText text "Resting")
|
rlm@536
|
3117 :else (.setText text "Unknown")))))))
|
rlm@451
|
3118
|
rlm@451
|
3119 (defn empathy-experiment [record]
|
rlm@451
|
3120 (.start (worm-world :experience-watch (debug-experience-phi)
|
rlm@451
|
3121 :record record :worm worm*)))
|
rlm@451
|
3122 #+end_src
|
rlm@451
|
3123 #+end_listing
|
rlm@536
|
3124
|
rlm@536
|
3125 These programs create a test for the empathy system. First, the
|
rlm@536
|
3126 worm's \Phi-space is generated from a simple motor script. Then the
|
rlm@536
|
3127 worm is re-created in an environment almost exactly identical to
|
rlm@536
|
3128 the testing environment for the action-predicates, with one major
|
rlm@536
|
3129 difference : the only sensory information available to the system
|
rlm@536
|
3130 is proprioception. From just the proprioception data and
|
rlm@548
|
3131 \Phi-space, =longest-thread= synthesizes a complete record the last
|
rlm@536
|
3132 300 sensory experiences of the worm. These synthesized experiences
|
rlm@536
|
3133 are fed directly into the action predicates =grand-circle?=,
|
rlm@536
|
3134 =curled?=, =wiggling?=, and =resting?= from before and their output
|
rlm@536
|
3135 is printed to the screen at each frame.
|
rlm@451
|
3136
|
rlm@451
|
3137 The result of running =empathy-experiment= is that the system is
|
rlm@451
|
3138 generally able to interpret worm actions using the action-predicates
|
rlm@451
|
3139 on simulated sensory data just as well as with actual data. Figure
|
rlm@451
|
3140 \ref{empathy-debug-image} was generated using =empathy-experiment=:
|
rlm@451
|
3141
|
rlm@451
|
3142 #+caption: From only proprioceptive data, =EMPATH= was able to infer
|
rlm@451
|
3143 #+caption: the complete sensory experience and classify four poses
|
rlm@517
|
3144 #+caption: (The last panel shows a composite image of /wiggling/,
|
rlm@451
|
3145 #+caption: a dynamic pose.)
|
rlm@451
|
3146 #+name: empathy-debug-image
|
rlm@451
|
3147 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 10cm :placement [H]
|
rlm@451
|
3148 [[./images/empathy-1.png]]
|
rlm@451
|
3149
|
rlm@451
|
3150 One way to measure the performance of =EMPATH= is to compare the
|
rlm@517
|
3151 suitability of the imagined sense experience to trigger the same
|
rlm@451
|
3152 action predicates as the real sensory experience.
|
rlm@451
|
3153
|
rlm@451
|
3154 #+caption: Determine how closely empathy approximates actual
|
rlm@451
|
3155 #+caption: sensory data.
|
rlm@451
|
3156 #+name: test-empathy-accuracy
|
rlm@452
|
3157 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@451
|
3158 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@451
|
3159 (def worm-action-label
|
rlm@451
|
3160 (juxt grand-circle? curled? wiggling?))
|
rlm@451
|
3161
|
rlm@451
|
3162 (defn compare-empathy-with-baseline [matches]
|
rlm@451
|
3163 (let [proprio (atom ())]
|
rlm@451
|
3164 (fn
|
rlm@451
|
3165 [experiences text]
|
rlm@451
|
3166 (let [phi-indices (phi-scan (:proprioception (peek experiences)))]
|
rlm@451
|
3167 (swap! proprio (partial cons phi-indices))
|
rlm@451
|
3168 (let [exp-thread (longest-thread (take 300 @proprio))
|
rlm@451
|
3169 empathy (mapv phi-space (infer-nils exp-thread))
|
rlm@451
|
3170 experience-matches-empathy
|
rlm@451
|
3171 (= (worm-action-label experiences)
|
rlm@451
|
3172 (worm-action-label empathy))]
|
rlm@451
|
3173 (println-repl experience-matches-empathy)
|
rlm@451
|
3174 (swap! matches #(conj % experience-matches-empathy)))))))
|
rlm@451
|
3175
|
rlm@451
|
3176 (defn accuracy [v]
|
rlm@451
|
3177 (float (/ (count (filter true? v)) (count v))))
|
rlm@451
|
3178
|
rlm@451
|
3179 (defn test-empathy-accuracy []
|
rlm@451
|
3180 (let [res (atom [])]
|
rlm@451
|
3181 (run-world
|
rlm@451
|
3182 (worm-world :experience-watch
|
rlm@451
|
3183 (compare-empathy-with-baseline res)
|
rlm@451
|
3184 :worm worm*))
|
rlm@451
|
3185 (accuracy @res)))
|
rlm@451
|
3186 #+end_src
|
rlm@451
|
3187 #+end_listing
|
rlm@451
|
3188
|
rlm@451
|
3189 Running =test-empathy-accuracy= using the very short exercise
|
rlm@451
|
3190 program defined in listing \ref{generate-phi-space}, and then doing
|
rlm@517
|
3191 a similar pattern of activity manually yields an accuracy of around
|
rlm@451
|
3192 73%. This is based on very limited worm experience. By training the
|
rlm@451
|
3193 worm for longer, the accuracy dramatically improves.
|
rlm@451
|
3194
|
rlm@451
|
3195 #+caption: Program to generate \Phi-space using manual training.
|
rlm@451
|
3196 #+name: manual-phi-space
|
rlm@451
|
3197 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@451
|
3198 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@451
|
3199 (defn init-interactive []
|
rlm@451
|
3200 (def phi-space
|
rlm@451
|
3201 (let [experiences (atom [])]
|
rlm@451
|
3202 (run-world
|
rlm@451
|
3203 (apply-map
|
rlm@451
|
3204 worm-world
|
rlm@451
|
3205 (merge
|
rlm@451
|
3206 (worm-world-defaults)
|
rlm@451
|
3207 {:experiences experiences})))
|
rlm@451
|
3208 @experiences))
|
rlm@451
|
3209 (def phi-scan (gen-phi-scan phi-space)))
|
rlm@451
|
3210 #+end_src
|
rlm@451
|
3211 #+end_listing
|
rlm@451
|
3212
|
rlm@451
|
3213 After about 1 minute of manual training, I was able to achieve 95%
|
rlm@451
|
3214 accuracy on manual testing of the worm using =init-interactive= and
|
rlm@549
|
3215 =test-empathy-accuracy=. The majority of disagreements are near the
|
rlm@549
|
3216 transition boundaries from one type of action to another. During
|
rlm@549
|
3217 these transitions the exact label for the action is often unclear,
|
rlm@549
|
3218 and disagreement between empathy and experience is practically
|
rlm@549
|
3219 irrelevant. Thus, the system's effective identification accuracy is
|
rlm@549
|
3220 even higher than 95%. When I watch this system myself, I generally
|
rlm@549
|
3221 see no errors in action identification compared to my own judgment
|
rlm@549
|
3222 of what the worm is doing.
|
rlm@536
|
3223
|
rlm@541
|
3224 ** Digression: Learning touch sensor layout through free play
|
rlm@514
|
3225
|
rlm@551
|
3226 In the previous chapter I showed how to compute actions in terms of
|
rlm@539
|
3227 body-centered predicates, but some of those predicates relied on
|
rlm@539
|
3228 the average touch activation of pre-defined regions of the worm's
|
rlm@539
|
3229 skin. What if, instead of receiving touch pre-grouped into the six
|
rlm@539
|
3230 faces of each worm segment, the true topology of the worm's skin
|
rlm@539
|
3231 was unknown? This is more similar to how a nerve fiber bundle might
|
rlm@539
|
3232 be arranged inside an animal. While two fibers that are close in a
|
rlm@539
|
3233 nerve bundle /might/ correspond to two touch sensors that are close
|
rlm@539
|
3234 together on the skin, the process of taking a complicated surface
|
rlm@539
|
3235 and forcing it into essentially a circle requires that some regions
|
rlm@539
|
3236 of skin that are close together in the animal end up far apart in
|
rlm@539
|
3237 the nerve bundle.
|
rlm@452
|
3238
|
rlm@551
|
3239 In this chapter I show how to automatically learn the skin-topology of
|
rlm@452
|
3240 a worm segment by free exploration. As the worm rolls around on the
|
rlm@452
|
3241 floor, large sections of its surface get activated. If the worm has
|
rlm@452
|
3242 stopped moving, then whatever region of skin that is touching the
|
rlm@452
|
3243 floor is probably an important region, and should be recorded.
|
rlm@452
|
3244
|
rlm@452
|
3245 #+caption: Program to detect whether the worm is in a resting state
|
rlm@452
|
3246 #+caption: with one face touching the floor.
|
rlm@452
|
3247 #+name: pure-touch
|
rlm@452
|
3248 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@452
|
3249 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@452
|
3250 (def full-contact [(float 0.0) (float 0.1)])
|
rlm@452
|
3251
|
rlm@452
|
3252 (defn pure-touch?
|
rlm@452
|
3253 "This is worm specific code to determine if a large region of touch
|
rlm@452
|
3254 sensors is either all on or all off."
|
rlm@452
|
3255 [[coords touch :as touch-data]]
|
rlm@452
|
3256 (= (set (map first touch)) (set full-contact)))
|
rlm@452
|
3257 #+end_src
|
rlm@452
|
3258 #+end_listing
|
rlm@452
|
3259
|
rlm@452
|
3260 After collecting these important regions, there will many nearly
|
rlm@517
|
3261 similar touch regions. While for some purposes the subtle
|
rlm@452
|
3262 differences between these regions will be important, for my
|
rlm@517
|
3263 purposes I collapse them into mostly non-overlapping sets using
|
rlm@517
|
3264 =remove-similar= in listing \ref{remove-similar}
|
rlm@517
|
3265
|
rlm@517
|
3266 #+caption: Program to take a list of sets of points and ``collapse them''
|
rlm@517
|
3267 #+caption: so that the remaining sets in the list are significantly
|
rlm@452
|
3268 #+caption: different from each other. Prefer smaller sets to larger ones.
|
rlm@517
|
3269 #+name: remove-similar
|
rlm@452
|
3270 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@452
|
3271 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@452
|
3272 (defn remove-similar
|
rlm@452
|
3273 [coll]
|
rlm@452
|
3274 (loop [result () coll (sort-by (comp - count) coll)]
|
rlm@452
|
3275 (if (empty? coll) result
|
rlm@452
|
3276 (let [[x & xs] coll
|
rlm@452
|
3277 c (count x)]
|
rlm@452
|
3278 (if (some
|
rlm@452
|
3279 (fn [other-set]
|
rlm@452
|
3280 (let [oc (count other-set)]
|
rlm@452
|
3281 (< (- (count (union other-set x)) c) (* oc 0.1))))
|
rlm@452
|
3282 xs)
|
rlm@452
|
3283 (recur result xs)
|
rlm@452
|
3284 (recur (cons x result) xs))))))
|
rlm@452
|
3285 #+end_src
|
rlm@452
|
3286 #+end_listing
|
rlm@452
|
3287
|
rlm@452
|
3288 Actually running this simulation is easy given =CORTEX='s facilities.
|
rlm@452
|
3289
|
rlm@452
|
3290 #+caption: Collect experiences while the worm moves around. Filter the touch
|
rlm@517
|
3291 #+caption: sensations by stable ones, collapse similar ones together,
|
rlm@452
|
3292 #+caption: and report the regions learned.
|
rlm@452
|
3293 #+name: learn-touch
|
rlm@452
|
3294 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@452
|
3295 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@452
|
3296 (defn learn-touch-regions []
|
rlm@452
|
3297 (let [experiences (atom [])
|
rlm@452
|
3298 world (apply-map
|
rlm@452
|
3299 worm-world
|
rlm@452
|
3300 (assoc (worm-segment-defaults)
|
rlm@452
|
3301 :experiences experiences))]
|
rlm@452
|
3302 (run-world world)
|
rlm@452
|
3303 (->>
|
rlm@452
|
3304 @experiences
|
rlm@452
|
3305 (drop 175)
|
rlm@452
|
3306 ;; access the single segment's touch data
|
rlm@452
|
3307 (map (comp first :touch))
|
rlm@452
|
3308 ;; only deal with "pure" touch data to determine surfaces
|
rlm@452
|
3309 (filter pure-touch?)
|
rlm@452
|
3310 ;; associate coordinates with touch values
|
rlm@452
|
3311 (map (partial apply zipmap))
|
rlm@452
|
3312 ;; select those regions where contact is being made
|
rlm@452
|
3313 (map (partial group-by second))
|
rlm@452
|
3314 (map #(get % full-contact))
|
rlm@452
|
3315 (map (partial map first))
|
rlm@452
|
3316 ;; remove redundant/subset regions
|
rlm@452
|
3317 (map set)
|
rlm@452
|
3318 remove-similar)))
|
rlm@452
|
3319
|
rlm@452
|
3320 (defn learn-and-view-touch-regions []
|
rlm@452
|
3321 (map view-touch-region
|
rlm@452
|
3322 (learn-touch-regions)))
|
rlm@452
|
3323 #+end_src
|
rlm@452
|
3324 #+end_listing
|
rlm@452
|
3325
|
rlm@517
|
3326 The only thing remaining to define is the particular motion the worm
|
rlm@452
|
3327 must take. I accomplish this with a simple motor control program.
|
rlm@452
|
3328
|
rlm@452
|
3329 #+caption: Motor control program for making the worm roll on the ground.
|
rlm@452
|
3330 #+caption: This could also be replaced with random motion.
|
rlm@452
|
3331 #+name: worm-roll
|
rlm@452
|
3332 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@452
|
3333 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@452
|
3334 (defn touch-kinesthetics []
|
rlm@452
|
3335 [[170 :lift-1 40]
|
rlm@452
|
3336 [190 :lift-1 19]
|
rlm@452
|
3337 [206 :lift-1 0]
|
rlm@452
|
3338
|
rlm@452
|
3339 [400 :lift-2 40]
|
rlm@452
|
3340 [410 :lift-2 0]
|
rlm@452
|
3341
|
rlm@452
|
3342 [570 :lift-2 40]
|
rlm@452
|
3343 [590 :lift-2 21]
|
rlm@452
|
3344 [606 :lift-2 0]
|
rlm@452
|
3345
|
rlm@452
|
3346 [800 :lift-1 30]
|
rlm@452
|
3347 [809 :lift-1 0]
|
rlm@452
|
3348
|
rlm@452
|
3349 [900 :roll-2 40]
|
rlm@452
|
3350 [905 :roll-2 20]
|
rlm@452
|
3351 [910 :roll-2 0]
|
rlm@452
|
3352
|
rlm@452
|
3353 [1000 :roll-2 40]
|
rlm@452
|
3354 [1005 :roll-2 20]
|
rlm@452
|
3355 [1010 :roll-2 0]
|
rlm@452
|
3356
|
rlm@452
|
3357 [1100 :roll-2 40]
|
rlm@452
|
3358 [1105 :roll-2 20]
|
rlm@452
|
3359 [1110 :roll-2 0]
|
rlm@452
|
3360 ])
|
rlm@452
|
3361 #+end_src
|
rlm@452
|
3362 #+end_listing
|
rlm@452
|
3363
|
rlm@452
|
3364
|
rlm@452
|
3365 #+caption: The small worm rolls around on the floor, driven
|
rlm@452
|
3366 #+caption: by the motor control program in listing \ref{worm-roll}.
|
rlm@452
|
3367 #+name: worm-roll
|
rlm@452
|
3368 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 12cm
|
rlm@452
|
3369 [[./images/worm-roll.png]]
|
rlm@452
|
3370
|
rlm@452
|
3371 #+caption: After completing its adventures, the worm now knows
|
rlm@548
|
3372 #+caption: how its touch sensors are arranged along its skin. Each of these six rectangles are touch sensory patterns that were
|
rlm@548
|
3373 #+caption: deemed important by
|
rlm@537
|
3374 #+caption: =learn-touch-regions=. Each white square in the rectangles
|
rlm@537
|
3375 #+caption: above is a cluster of ``related" touch nodes as determined
|
rlm@548
|
3376 #+caption: by the system. The worm has correctly discovered that it has six faces, and has partitioned its sensory map into these six faces.
|
rlm@452
|
3377 #+name: worm-touch-map
|
rlm@452
|
3378 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 12cm
|
rlm@452
|
3379 [[./images/touch-learn.png]]
|
rlm@452
|
3380
|
rlm@452
|
3381 While simple, =learn-touch-regions= exploits regularities in both
|
rlm@452
|
3382 the worm's physiology and the worm's environment to correctly
|
rlm@452
|
3383 deduce that the worm has six sides. Note that =learn-touch-regions=
|
rlm@452
|
3384 would work just as well even if the worm's touch sense data were
|
rlm@517
|
3385 completely scrambled. The cross shape is just for convenience. This
|
rlm@452
|
3386 example justifies the use of pre-defined touch regions in =EMPATH=.
|
rlm@452
|
3387
|
rlm@548
|
3388 ** Recognizing an object using embodied representation
|
rlm@548
|
3389
|
rlm@548
|
3390 At the beginning of the thesis, I suggested that we might recognize
|
rlm@548
|
3391 the chair in Figure \ref{hidden-chair} by imagining ourselves in
|
rlm@548
|
3392 the position of the man and realizing that he must be sitting on
|
rlm@548
|
3393 something in order to maintain that position. Here, I present a
|
rlm@548
|
3394 brief elaboration on how to this might be done.
|
rlm@548
|
3395
|
rlm@548
|
3396 First, I need the feeling of leaning or resting /on/ some other
|
rlm@548
|
3397 object that is not the floor. This feeling is easy to describe
|
rlm@548
|
3398 using an embodied representation.
|
rlm@548
|
3399
|
rlm@548
|
3400 #+caption: Program describing the sense of leaning or resting on something.
|
rlm@548
|
3401 #+caption: This involves a relaxed posture, the feeling of touching something,
|
rlm@548
|
3402 #+caption: and a period of stability where the worm does not move.
|
rlm@548
|
3403 #+name: draped
|
rlm@548
|
3404 #+begin_listing clojure
|
rlm@548
|
3405 #+begin_src clojure
|
rlm@548
|
3406 (defn draped?
|
rlm@548
|
3407 "Is the worm:
|
rlm@548
|
3408 -- not flat (the floor is not a 'chair')
|
rlm@548
|
3409 -- supported (not using its muscles to hold its position)
|
rlm@548
|
3410 -- stable (not changing its position)
|
rlm@548
|
3411 -- touching something (must register contact)"
|
rlm@548
|
3412 [experiences]
|
rlm@548
|
3413 (let [b2-hash (bin 2)
|
rlm@548
|
3414 touch (:touch (peek experiences))
|
rlm@548
|
3415 total-contact
|
rlm@548
|
3416 (reduce
|
rlm@548
|
3417 +
|
rlm@548
|
3418 (map #(contact all-touch-coordinates %)
|
rlm@548
|
3419 (rest touch)))]
|
rlm@548
|
3420 (println total-contact)
|
rlm@548
|
3421 (and (not (resting? experiences))
|
rlm@548
|
3422 (every?
|
rlm@548
|
3423 zero?
|
rlm@548
|
3424 (-> experiences
|
rlm@548
|
3425 (vector:last-n 25)
|
rlm@548
|
3426 (#(map :muscle %))
|
rlm@548
|
3427 (flatten)))
|
rlm@548
|
3428 (-> experiences
|
rlm@548
|
3429 (vector:last-n 20)
|
rlm@548
|
3430 (#(map (comp b2-hash flatten :proprioception) %))
|
rlm@548
|
3431 (set)
|
rlm@548
|
3432 (count) (= 1))
|
rlm@548
|
3433 (< 0.03 total-contact))))
|
rlm@548
|
3434 #+end_src
|
rlm@548
|
3435 #+end_listing
|
rlm@548
|
3436
|
rlm@548
|
3437 #+caption: The =draped?= predicate detects the presence of the
|
rlm@548
|
3438 #+caption: cube whenever the worm interacts with it. The details of the
|
rlm@548
|
3439 #+caption: cube are irrelevant; only the way it influences the worm's
|
rlm@548
|
3440 #+caption: body matters.
|
rlm@548
|
3441 #+name: draped-video
|
rlm@548
|
3442 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 13cm
|
rlm@548
|
3443 [[./images/draped.png]]
|
rlm@548
|
3444
|
rlm@548
|
3445 Though this is a simple example, using the =draped?= predicate to
|
rlm@550
|
3446 detect a cube has interesting advantages. The =draped?= predicate
|
rlm@548
|
3447 describes the cube not in terms of properties that the cube has,
|
rlm@548
|
3448 but instead in terms of how the worm interacts with it physically.
|
rlm@548
|
3449 This means that the cube can still be detected even if it is not
|
rlm@548
|
3450 visible, as long as its influence on the worm's body is visible.
|
rlm@548
|
3451
|
rlm@548
|
3452 This system will also see the virtual cube created by a
|
rlm@548
|
3453 ``mimeworm", which uses its muscles in a very controlled way to
|
rlm@548
|
3454 mimic the appearance of leaning on a cube. The system will
|
rlm@548
|
3455 anticipate that there is an actual invisible cube that provides
|
rlm@548
|
3456 support!
|
rlm@548
|
3457
|
rlm@548
|
3458 #+caption: Can you see the thing that this person is leaning on?
|
rlm@548
|
3459 #+caption: What properties does it have, other than how it makes the man's
|
rlm@548
|
3460 #+caption: elbow and shoulder feel? I wonder if people who can actually
|
rlm@548
|
3461 #+caption: maintain this pose easily still see the support?
|
rlm@548
|
3462 #+name: mime
|
rlm@548
|
3463 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 6cm
|
rlm@548
|
3464 [[./images/pablo-the-mime.png]]
|
rlm@548
|
3465
|
rlm@548
|
3466 This makes me wonder about the psychology of actual mimes. Suppose
|
rlm@548
|
3467 for a moment that people have something analogous to \Phi-space and
|
rlm@548
|
3468 that one of the ways that they find objects in a scene is by their
|
rlm@548
|
3469 relation to other people's bodies. Suppose that a person watches a
|
rlm@548
|
3470 person miming an invisible wall. For a person with no experience
|
rlm@548
|
3471 with miming, their \Phi-space will only have entries that describe
|
rlm@548
|
3472 the scene with the sensation of their hands touching a wall. This
|
rlm@548
|
3473 sensation of touch will create a strong impression of a wall, even
|
rlm@548
|
3474 though the wall would have to be invisible. A person with
|
rlm@548
|
3475 experience in miming however, will have entries in their \Phi-space
|
rlm@548
|
3476 that describe the wall-miming position without a sense of touch. It
|
rlm@548
|
3477 will not seem to such as person that an invisible wall is present,
|
rlm@548
|
3478 but merely that the mime is holding out their hands in a special
|
rlm@548
|
3479 way. Thus, the theory that humans use something like \Phi-space
|
rlm@548
|
3480 weakly predicts that learning how to mime should break the power of
|
rlm@548
|
3481 miming illusions. Most optical illusions still work no matter how
|
rlm@548
|
3482 much you know about them, so this proposal would be quite
|
rlm@548
|
3483 interesting to test, as it predicts a non-standard result!
|
rlm@548
|
3484
|
rlm@548
|
3485
|
rlm@548
|
3486 #+BEGIN_LaTeX
|
rlm@548
|
3487 \clearpage
|
rlm@548
|
3488 #+END_LaTeX
|
rlm@548
|
3489
|
rlm@551
|
3490 * COMMENT Contributions
|
rlm@548
|
3491
|
rlm@548
|
3492 The big idea behind this thesis is a new way to represent and
|
rlm@548
|
3493 recognize physical actions, which I call /empathic representation/.
|
rlm@548
|
3494 Actions are represented as predicates which have access to the
|
rlm@548
|
3495 totality of a creature's sensory abilities. To recognize the
|
rlm@548
|
3496 physical actions of another creature similar to yourself, you
|
rlm@548
|
3497 imagine what they would feel by examining the position of their body
|
rlm@548
|
3498 and relating it to your own previous experience.
|
rlm@454
|
3499
|
rlm@548
|
3500 Empathic representation of physical actions is robust and general.
|
rlm@548
|
3501 Because the representation is body-centered, it avoids baking in a
|
rlm@548
|
3502 particular viewpoint like you might get from learning from example
|
rlm@548
|
3503 videos. Because empathic representation relies on all of a
|
rlm@542
|
3504 creature's senses, it can describe exactly what an action /feels
|
rlm@542
|
3505 like/ without getting caught up in irrelevant details such as visual
|
rlm@542
|
3506 appearance. I think it is important that a correct description of
|
rlm@548
|
3507 jumping (for example) should not include irrelevant details such as
|
rlm@548
|
3508 the color of a person's clothes or skin; empathic representation can
|
rlm@548
|
3509 get right to the heart of what jumping is by describing it in terms
|
rlm@548
|
3510 of touch, muscle contractions, and a brief feeling of
|
rlm@548
|
3511 weightlessness. Empathic representation is very low-level in that it
|
rlm@548
|
3512 describes actions using concrete sensory data with little
|
rlm@548
|
3513 abstraction, but it has the generality of much more abstract
|
rlm@548
|
3514 representations!
|
rlm@542
|
3515
|
rlm@542
|
3516 Another important contribution of this thesis is the development of
|
rlm@542
|
3517 the =CORTEX= system, a complete environment for creating simulated
|
rlm@542
|
3518 creatures. You have seen how to implement five senses: touch,
|
rlm@542
|
3519 proprioception, hearing, vision, and muscle tension. You have seen
|
rlm@542
|
3520 how to create new creatures using blender, a 3D modeling tool.
|
rlm@542
|
3521
|
rlm@461
|
3522 As a minor digression, you also saw how I used =CORTEX= to enable a
|
rlm@461
|
3523 tiny worm to discover the topology of its skin simply by rolling on
|
rlm@548
|
3524 the ground. You also saw how to detect objects using only embodied
|
rlm@548
|
3525 predicates.
|
rlm@548
|
3526
|
rlm@548
|
3527 In conclusion, for this thesis I:
|
rlm@548
|
3528
|
rlm@548
|
3529 - Developed the idea of embodied representation, which describes
|
rlm@548
|
3530 actions that a creature can do in terms of first-person sensory
|
rlm@548
|
3531 data.
|
rlm@548
|
3532
|
rlm@548
|
3533 - Developed a method of empathic action recognition which uses
|
rlm@548
|
3534 previous embodied experience and embodied representation of
|
rlm@548
|
3535 actions to greatly constrain the possible interpretations of an
|
rlm@548
|
3536 action.
|
rlm@548
|
3537
|
rlm@548
|
3538 - Created =EMPATH=, a program which uses empathic action
|
rlm@548
|
3539 recognition to recognize physical actions in a simple model
|
rlm@548
|
3540 involving segmented worm-like creatures.
|
rlm@548
|
3541
|
rlm@548
|
3542 - Created =CORTEX=, a comprehensive platform for embodied AI
|
rlm@548
|
3543 experiments. It is the base on which =EMPATH= is built.
|
rlm@517
|
3544
|
rlm@488
|
3545 #+BEGIN_LaTeX
|
rlm@548
|
3546 \clearpage
|
rlm@488
|
3547 \appendix
|
rlm@488
|
3548 #+END_LaTeX
|
rlm@517
|
3549
|
rlm@551
|
3550 * COMMENT Appendix: =CORTEX= User Guide
|
rlm@488
|
3551
|
rlm@488
|
3552 Those who write a thesis should endeavor to make their code not only
|
rlm@517
|
3553 accessible, but actually usable, as a way to pay back the community
|
rlm@488
|
3554 that made the thesis possible in the first place. This thesis would
|
rlm@488
|
3555 not be possible without Free Software such as jMonkeyEngine3,
|
rlm@488
|
3556 Blender, clojure, emacs, ffmpeg, and many other tools. That is why I
|
rlm@488
|
3557 have included this user guide, in the hope that someone else might
|
rlm@488
|
3558 find =CORTEX= useful.
|
rlm@488
|
3559
|
rlm@488
|
3560 ** Obtaining =CORTEX=
|
rlm@488
|
3561
|
rlm@488
|
3562 You can get cortex from its mercurial repository at
|
rlm@488
|
3563 http://hg.bortreb.com/cortex. You may also download =CORTEX=
|
rlm@488
|
3564 releases at http://aurellem.org/cortex/releases/. As a condition of
|
rlm@488
|
3565 making this thesis, I have also provided Professor Winston the
|
rlm@488
|
3566 =CORTEX= source, and he knows how to run the demos and get started.
|
rlm@488
|
3567 You may also email me at =cortex@aurellem.org= and I may help where
|
rlm@488
|
3568 I can.
|
rlm@488
|
3569
|
rlm@488
|
3570 ** Running =CORTEX=
|
rlm@488
|
3571
|
rlm@488
|
3572 =CORTEX= comes with README and INSTALL files that will guide you
|
rlm@488
|
3573 through installation and running the test suite. In particular you
|
rlm@488
|
3574 should look at test =cortex.test= which contains test suites that
|
rlm@488
|
3575 run through all senses and multiple creatures.
|
rlm@488
|
3576
|
rlm@488
|
3577 ** Creating creatures
|
rlm@488
|
3578
|
rlm@488
|
3579 Creatures are created using /Blender/, a free 3D modeling program.
|
rlm@488
|
3580 You will need Blender version 2.6 when using the =CORTEX= included
|
rlm@517
|
3581 in this thesis. You create a =CORTEX= creature in a similar manner
|
rlm@488
|
3582 to modeling anything in Blender, except that you also create
|
rlm@488
|
3583 several trees of empty nodes which define the creature's senses.
|
rlm@488
|
3584
|
rlm@488
|
3585 *** Mass
|
rlm@488
|
3586
|
rlm@488
|
3587 To give an object mass in =CORTEX=, add a ``mass'' metadata label
|
rlm@488
|
3588 to the object with the mass in jMonkeyEngine units. Note that
|
rlm@488
|
3589 setting the mass to 0 causes the object to be immovable.
|
rlm@488
|
3590
|
rlm@488
|
3591 *** Joints
|
rlm@488
|
3592
|
rlm@488
|
3593 Joints are created by creating an empty node named =joints= and
|
rlm@488
|
3594 then creating any number of empty child nodes to represent your
|
rlm@488
|
3595 creature's joints. The joint will automatically connect the
|
rlm@488
|
3596 closest two physical objects. It will help to set the empty node's
|
rlm@488
|
3597 display mode to ``Arrows'' so that you can clearly see the
|
rlm@488
|
3598 direction of the axes.
|
rlm@488
|
3599
|
rlm@488
|
3600 Joint nodes should have the following metadata under the ``joint''
|
rlm@488
|
3601 label:
|
rlm@488
|
3602
|
rlm@488
|
3603 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@540
|
3604 ;; ONE of the following, under the label "joint":
|
rlm@488
|
3605 {:type :point}
|
rlm@488
|
3606
|
rlm@488
|
3607 ;; OR
|
rlm@488
|
3608
|
rlm@488
|
3609 {:type :hinge
|
rlm@488
|
3610 :limit [<limit-low> <limit-high>]
|
rlm@488
|
3611 :axis (Vector3f. <x> <y> <z>)}
|
rlm@488
|
3612 ;;(:axis defaults to (Vector3f. 1 0 0) if not provided for hinge joints)
|
rlm@488
|
3613
|
rlm@488
|
3614 ;; OR
|
rlm@488
|
3615
|
rlm@488
|
3616 {:type :cone
|
rlm@488
|
3617 :limit-xz <lim-xz>
|
rlm@488
|
3618 :limit-xy <lim-xy>
|
rlm@488
|
3619 :twist <lim-twist>} ;(use XZY rotation mode in blender!)
|
rlm@488
|
3620 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@488
|
3621
|
rlm@488
|
3622 *** Eyes
|
rlm@488
|
3623
|
rlm@488
|
3624 Eyes are created by creating an empty node named =eyes= and then
|
rlm@488
|
3625 creating any number of empty child nodes to represent your
|
rlm@488
|
3626 creature's eyes.
|
rlm@488
|
3627
|
rlm@488
|
3628 Eye nodes should have the following metadata under the ``eye''
|
rlm@488
|
3629 label:
|
rlm@488
|
3630
|
rlm@488
|
3631 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@488
|
3632 {:red <red-retina-definition>
|
rlm@488
|
3633 :blue <blue-retina-definition>
|
rlm@488
|
3634 :green <green-retina-definition>
|
rlm@488
|
3635 :all <all-retina-definition>
|
rlm@488
|
3636 (<0xrrggbb> <custom-retina-image>)...
|
rlm@488
|
3637 }
|
rlm@488
|
3638 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@488
|
3639
|
rlm@488
|
3640 Any of the color channels may be omitted. You may also include
|
rlm@488
|
3641 your own color selectors, and in fact :red is equivalent to
|
rlm@488
|
3642 0xFF0000 and so forth. The eye will be placed at the same position
|
rlm@488
|
3643 as the empty node and will bind to the neatest physical object.
|
rlm@488
|
3644 The eye will point outward from the X-axis of the node, and ``up''
|
rlm@488
|
3645 will be in the direction of the X-axis of the node. It will help
|
rlm@488
|
3646 to set the empty node's display mode to ``Arrows'' so that you can
|
rlm@488
|
3647 clearly see the direction of the axes.
|
rlm@488
|
3648
|
rlm@517
|
3649 Each retina file should contain white pixels wherever you want to be
|
rlm@488
|
3650 sensitive to your chosen color. If you want the entire field of
|
rlm@488
|
3651 view, specify :all of 0xFFFFFF and a retinal map that is entirely
|
rlm@488
|
3652 white.
|
rlm@488
|
3653
|
rlm@488
|
3654 Here is a sample retinal map:
|
rlm@488
|
3655
|
rlm@488
|
3656 #+caption: An example retinal profile image. White pixels are
|
rlm@488
|
3657 #+caption: photo-sensitive elements. The distribution of white
|
rlm@488
|
3658 #+caption: pixels is denser in the middle and falls off at the
|
rlm@488
|
3659 #+caption: edges and is inspired by the human retina.
|
rlm@488
|
3660 #+name: retina
|
rlm@488
|
3661 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 7cm :placement [H]
|
rlm@488
|
3662 [[./images/retina-small.png]]
|
rlm@488
|
3663
|
rlm@488
|
3664 *** Hearing
|
rlm@488
|
3665
|
rlm@488
|
3666 Ears are created by creating an empty node named =ears= and then
|
rlm@488
|
3667 creating any number of empty child nodes to represent your
|
rlm@488
|
3668 creature's ears.
|
rlm@488
|
3669
|
rlm@488
|
3670 Ear nodes do not require any metadata.
|
rlm@488
|
3671
|
rlm@488
|
3672 The ear will bind to and follow the closest physical node.
|
rlm@488
|
3673
|
rlm@488
|
3674 *** Touch
|
rlm@488
|
3675
|
rlm@488
|
3676 Touch is handled similarly to mass. To make a particular object
|
rlm@488
|
3677 touch sensitive, add metadata of the following form under the
|
rlm@488
|
3678 object's ``touch'' metadata field:
|
rlm@488
|
3679
|
rlm@488
|
3680 #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@488
|
3681 <touch-UV-map-file-name>
|
rlm@488
|
3682 #+END_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@488
|
3683
|
rlm@488
|
3684 You may also include an optional ``scale'' metadata number to
|
rlm@517
|
3685 specify the length of the touch feelers. The default is $0.1$,
|
rlm@488
|
3686 and this is generally sufficient.
|
rlm@488
|
3687
|
rlm@488
|
3688 The touch UV should contain white pixels for each touch sensor.
|
rlm@488
|
3689
|
rlm@488
|
3690 Here is an example touch-uv map that approximates a human finger,
|
rlm@488
|
3691 and its corresponding model.
|
rlm@488
|
3692
|
rlm@488
|
3693 #+caption: This is the tactile-sensor-profile for the upper segment
|
rlm@488
|
3694 #+caption: of a fingertip. It defines regions of high touch sensitivity
|
rlm@488
|
3695 #+caption: (where there are many white pixels) and regions of low
|
rlm@488
|
3696 #+caption: sensitivity (where white pixels are sparse).
|
rlm@488
|
3697 #+name: guide-fingertip-UV
|
rlm@488
|
3698 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 9cm :placement [H]
|
rlm@488
|
3699 [[./images/finger-UV.png]]
|
rlm@488
|
3700
|
rlm@488
|
3701 #+caption: The fingertip UV-image form above applied to a simple
|
rlm@488
|
3702 #+caption: model of a fingertip.
|
rlm@488
|
3703 #+name: guide-fingertip
|
rlm@488
|
3704 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 9cm :placement [H]
|
rlm@488
|
3705 [[./images/finger-2.png]]
|
rlm@488
|
3706
|
rlm@517
|
3707 *** Proprioception
|
rlm@488
|
3708
|
rlm@488
|
3709 Proprioception is tied to each joint node -- nothing special must
|
rlm@488
|
3710 be done in a blender model to enable proprioception other than
|
rlm@488
|
3711 creating joint nodes.
|
rlm@488
|
3712
|
rlm@488
|
3713 *** Muscles
|
rlm@488
|
3714
|
rlm@488
|
3715 Muscles are created by creating an empty node named =muscles= and
|
rlm@488
|
3716 then creating any number of empty child nodes to represent your
|
rlm@488
|
3717 creature's muscles.
|
rlm@488
|
3718
|
rlm@488
|
3719
|
rlm@488
|
3720 Muscle nodes should have the following metadata under the
|
rlm@488
|
3721 ``muscle'' label:
|
rlm@488
|
3722
|
rlm@488
|
3723 #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@488
|
3724 <muscle-profile-file-name>
|
rlm@488
|
3725 #+END_EXAMPLE
|
rlm@488
|
3726
|
rlm@488
|
3727 Muscles should also have a ``strength'' metadata entry describing
|
rlm@488
|
3728 the muscle's total strength at full activation.
|
rlm@488
|
3729
|
rlm@488
|
3730 Muscle profiles are simple images that contain the relative amount
|
rlm@488
|
3731 of muscle power in each simulated alpha motor neuron. The width of
|
rlm@488
|
3732 the image is the total size of the motor pool, and the redness of
|
rlm@488
|
3733 each neuron is the relative power of that motor pool.
|
rlm@488
|
3734
|
rlm@488
|
3735 While the profile image can have any dimensions, only the first
|
rlm@488
|
3736 line of pixels is used to define the muscle. Here is a sample
|
rlm@488
|
3737 muscle profile image that defines a human-like muscle.
|
rlm@488
|
3738
|
rlm@488
|
3739 #+caption: A muscle profile image that describes the strengths
|
rlm@488
|
3740 #+caption: of each motor neuron in a muscle. White is weakest
|
rlm@488
|
3741 #+caption: and dark red is strongest. This particular pattern
|
rlm@488
|
3742 #+caption: has weaker motor neurons at the beginning, just
|
rlm@488
|
3743 #+caption: like human muscle.
|
rlm@488
|
3744 #+name: muscle-recruit
|
rlm@488
|
3745 #+ATTR_LaTeX: :width 7cm :placement [H]
|
rlm@488
|
3746 [[./images/basic-muscle.png]]
|
rlm@488
|
3747
|
rlm@488
|
3748 Muscles twist the nearest physical object about the muscle node's
|
rlm@488
|
3749 Z-axis. I recommend using the ``Single Arrow'' display mode for
|
rlm@488
|
3750 muscles and using the right hand rule to determine which way the
|
rlm@488
|
3751 muscle will twist. To make a segment that can twist in multiple
|
rlm@488
|
3752 directions, create multiple, differently aligned muscles.
|
rlm@488
|
3753
|
rlm@488
|
3754 ** =CORTEX= API
|
rlm@488
|
3755
|
rlm@488
|
3756 These are the some functions exposed by =CORTEX= for creating
|
rlm@488
|
3757 worlds and simulating creatures. These are in addition to
|
rlm@488
|
3758 jMonkeyEngine3's extensive library, which is documented elsewhere.
|
rlm@488
|
3759
|
rlm@488
|
3760 *** Simulation
|
rlm@488
|
3761 - =(world root-node key-map setup-fn update-fn)= :: create
|
rlm@488
|
3762 a simulation.
|
rlm@488
|
3763 - /root-node/ :: a =com.jme3.scene.Node= object which
|
rlm@488
|
3764 contains all of the objects that should be in the
|
rlm@488
|
3765 simulation.
|
rlm@488
|
3766
|
rlm@488
|
3767 - /key-map/ :: a map from strings describing keys to
|
rlm@488
|
3768 functions that should be executed whenever that key is
|
rlm@488
|
3769 pressed. the functions should take a SimpleApplication
|
rlm@488
|
3770 object and a boolean value. The SimpleApplication is the
|
rlm@488
|
3771 current simulation that is running, and the boolean is true
|
rlm@488
|
3772 if the key is being pressed, and false if it is being
|
rlm@488
|
3773 released. As an example,
|
rlm@488
|
3774 #+BEGIN_SRC clojure
|
rlm@488
|
3775 {"key-j" (fn [game value] (if value (println "key j pressed")))}
|
rlm@488
|
3776 #+END_SRC
|
rlm@488
|
3777 is a valid key-map which will cause the simulation to print
|
rlm@488
|
3778 a message whenever the 'j' key on the keyboard is pressed.
|
rlm@488
|
3779
|
rlm@488
|
3780 - /setup-fn/ :: a function that takes a =SimpleApplication=
|
rlm@488
|
3781 object. It is called once when initializing the simulation.
|
rlm@488
|
3782 Use it to create things like lights, change the gravity,
|
rlm@488
|
3783 initialize debug nodes, etc.
|
rlm@488
|
3784
|
rlm@488
|
3785 - /update-fn/ :: this function takes a =SimpleApplication=
|
rlm@488
|
3786 object and a float and is called every frame of the
|
rlm@488
|
3787 simulation. The float tells how many seconds is has been
|
rlm@488
|
3788 since the last frame was rendered, according to whatever
|
rlm@488
|
3789 clock jme is currently using. The default is to use IsoTimer
|
rlm@488
|
3790 which will result in this value always being the same.
|
rlm@488
|
3791
|
rlm@488
|
3792 - =(position-camera world position rotation)= :: set the position
|
rlm@488
|
3793 of the simulation's main camera.
|
rlm@488
|
3794
|
rlm@488
|
3795 - =(enable-debug world)= :: turn on debug wireframes for each
|
rlm@488
|
3796 simulated object.
|
rlm@488
|
3797
|
rlm@488
|
3798 - =(set-gravity world gravity)= :: set the gravity of a running
|
rlm@488
|
3799 simulation.
|
rlm@488
|
3800
|
rlm@488
|
3801 - =(box length width height & {options})= :: create a box in the
|
rlm@488
|
3802 simulation. Options is a hash map specifying texture, mass,
|
rlm@488
|
3803 etc. Possible options are =:name=, =:color=, =:mass=,
|
rlm@488
|
3804 =:friction=, =:texture=, =:material=, =:position=,
|
rlm@488
|
3805 =:rotation=, =:shape=, and =:physical?=.
|
rlm@488
|
3806
|
rlm@488
|
3807 - =(sphere radius & {options})= :: create a sphere in the simulation.
|
rlm@488
|
3808 Options are the same as in =box=.
|
rlm@488
|
3809
|
rlm@488
|
3810 - =(load-blender-model file-name)= :: create a node structure
|
rlm@540
|
3811 representing the model described in a blender file.
|
rlm@488
|
3812
|
rlm@488
|
3813 - =(light-up-everything world)= :: distribute a standard compliment
|
rlm@517
|
3814 of lights throughout the simulation. Should be adequate for most
|
rlm@488
|
3815 purposes.
|
rlm@488
|
3816
|
rlm@517
|
3817 - =(node-seq node)= :: return a recursive list of the node's
|
rlm@488
|
3818 children.
|
rlm@488
|
3819
|
rlm@488
|
3820 - =(nodify name children)= :: construct a node given a node-name and
|
rlm@488
|
3821 desired children.
|
rlm@488
|
3822
|
rlm@488
|
3823 - =(add-element world element)= :: add an object to a running world
|
rlm@488
|
3824 simulation.
|
rlm@488
|
3825
|
rlm@488
|
3826 - =(set-accuracy world accuracy)= :: change the accuracy of the
|
rlm@488
|
3827 world's physics simulator.
|
rlm@488
|
3828
|
rlm@488
|
3829 - =(asset-manager)= :: get an /AssetManager/, a jMonkeyEngine
|
rlm@488
|
3830 construct that is useful for loading textures and is required
|
rlm@488
|
3831 for smooth interaction with jMonkeyEngine library functions.
|
rlm@488
|
3832
|
rlm@540
|
3833 - =(load-bullet)= :: unpack native libraries and initialize the
|
rlm@540
|
3834 bullet physics subsystem. This function is required before
|
rlm@540
|
3835 other world building functions are called.
|
rlm@488
|
3836
|
rlm@488
|
3837 *** Creature Manipulation / Import
|
rlm@488
|
3838
|
rlm@488
|
3839 - =(body! creature)= :: give the creature a physical body.
|
rlm@488
|
3840
|
rlm@488
|
3841 - =(vision! creature)= :: give the creature a sense of vision.
|
rlm@488
|
3842 Returns a list of functions which will each, when called
|
rlm@488
|
3843 during a simulation, return the vision data for the channel of
|
rlm@488
|
3844 one of the eyes. The functions are ordered depending on the
|
rlm@488
|
3845 alphabetical order of the names of the eye nodes in the
|
rlm@488
|
3846 blender file. The data returned by the functions is a vector
|
rlm@488
|
3847 containing the eye's /topology/, a vector of coordinates, and
|
rlm@488
|
3848 the eye's /data/, a vector of RGB values filtered by the eye's
|
rlm@488
|
3849 sensitivity.
|
rlm@488
|
3850
|
rlm@488
|
3851 - =(hearing! creature)= :: give the creature a sense of hearing.
|
rlm@488
|
3852 Returns a list of functions, one for each ear, that when
|
rlm@488
|
3853 called will return a frame's worth of hearing data for that
|
rlm@488
|
3854 ear. The functions are ordered depending on the alphabetical
|
rlm@488
|
3855 order of the names of the ear nodes in the blender file. The
|
rlm@540
|
3856 data returned by the functions is an array of PCM (pulse code
|
rlm@540
|
3857 modulated) wav data.
|
rlm@488
|
3858
|
rlm@488
|
3859 - =(touch! creature)= :: give the creature a sense of touch. Returns
|
rlm@488
|
3860 a single function that must be called with the /root node/ of
|
rlm@488
|
3861 the world, and which will return a vector of /touch-data/
|
rlm@488
|
3862 one entry for each touch sensitive component, each entry of
|
rlm@488
|
3863 which contains a /topology/ that specifies the distribution of
|
rlm@488
|
3864 touch sensors, and the /data/, which is a vector of
|
rlm@488
|
3865 =[activation, length]= pairs for each touch hair.
|
rlm@488
|
3866
|
rlm@488
|
3867 - =(proprioception! creature)= :: give the creature the sense of
|
rlm@488
|
3868 proprioception. Returns a list of functions, one for each
|
rlm@488
|
3869 joint, that when called during a running simulation will
|
rlm@517
|
3870 report the =[heading, pitch, roll]= of the joint.
|
rlm@488
|
3871
|
rlm@488
|
3872 - =(movement! creature)= :: give the creature the power of movement.
|
rlm@488
|
3873 Creates a list of functions, one for each muscle, that when
|
rlm@488
|
3874 called with an integer, will set the recruitment of that
|
rlm@488
|
3875 muscle to that integer, and will report the current power
|
rlm@488
|
3876 being exerted by the muscle. Order of muscles is determined by
|
rlm@488
|
3877 the alphabetical sort order of the names of the muscle nodes.
|
rlm@488
|
3878
|
rlm@488
|
3879 *** Visualization/Debug
|
rlm@488
|
3880
|
rlm@488
|
3881 - =(view-vision)= :: create a function that when called with a list
|
rlm@488
|
3882 of visual data returned from the functions made by =vision!=,
|
rlm@488
|
3883 will display that visual data on the screen.
|
rlm@488
|
3884
|
rlm@488
|
3885 - =(view-hearing)= :: same as =view-vision= but for hearing.
|
rlm@488
|
3886
|
rlm@488
|
3887 - =(view-touch)= :: same as =view-vision= but for touch.
|
rlm@488
|
3888
|
rlm@488
|
3889 - =(view-proprioception)= :: same as =view-vision= but for
|
rlm@488
|
3890 proprioception.
|
rlm@488
|
3891
|
rlm@540
|
3892 - =(view-movement)= :: same as =view-vision= but for muscles.
|
rlm@488
|
3893
|
rlm@488
|
3894 - =(view anything)= :: =view= is a polymorphic function that allows
|
rlm@488
|
3895 you to inspect almost anything you could reasonably expect to
|
rlm@488
|
3896 be able to ``see'' in =CORTEX=.
|
rlm@488
|
3897
|
rlm@488
|
3898 - =(text anything)= :: =text= is a polymorphic function that allows
|
rlm@488
|
3899 you to convert practically anything into a text string.
|
rlm@488
|
3900
|
rlm@488
|
3901 - =(println-repl anything)= :: print messages to clojure's repl
|
rlm@488
|
3902 instead of the simulation's terminal window.
|
rlm@488
|
3903
|
rlm@488
|
3904 - =(mega-import-jme3)= :: for experimenting at the REPL. This
|
rlm@488
|
3905 function will import all jMonkeyEngine3 classes for immediate
|
rlm@488
|
3906 use.
|
rlm@488
|
3907
|
rlm@517
|
3908 - =(display-dilated-time world timer)= :: Shows the time as it is
|
rlm@488
|
3909 flowing in the simulation on a HUD display.
|
rlm@488
|
3910
|
rlm@488
|
3911
|
rlm@488
|
3912
|
rlm@547
|
3913 TODO -- add a paper about detecting biological motion from only a few dots.
|